Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of US Adults by Level of Variety, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2013-2016.

M Katherine Hoy, John C Clemens, Carrie L Martin, Alanna J Moshfegh
Author Information
  1. M Katherine Hoy: Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA. ORCID
  2. John C Clemens: Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.
  3. Carrie L Martin: Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.
  4. Alanna J Moshfegh: Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary guidance encourages consuming a variety of fruit and vegetables (FVs), which has been associated with higher FV intake and nutrient adequacy. Dietary intake of adults in the United States has not been described in the context of variety.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe FV consumption of adults in the United States by level of FV variety.
METHODS: One day of dietary intake data of adults aged ≥20 y ( = 10,064) in What We Eat in America, NHANES 2013-2016 were used. FV variety was the count of foods consumed that contributed to total FV intake. Each FV was counted only once; a mixed dish counted as 1. Variety levels were high (≥5 items,  = 2316); moderate (3-4 items,  = 3423); or low (1-2 items,  = 3746). Differences between each level of variety were compared by test.
RESULTS: Among the low, moderate, and high levels, total FV intakes were 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 cup equivalents (CE), respectively. CE amounts of FVs consumed were 0.3, 0.6, and 1.4 of vegetables excluding potatoes; 0.2, 0.3, and 0.3 of potatoes; 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 of fruit; and 0.4, 0.4, and 0.5 from mixed dishes, respectively; percentages of each level reporting intake were 34%, 64%, and 89% for vegetables excluding potatoes; 23%, 34%, and 32% for potatoes; 22%, 49%, and 75% for fruit; and 72%, 71%, and 72% for mixed dishes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Those with more variety of FV intake include whole FVs more frequently and in higher amounts. These results support suggestions for encouraging more FVs at snacks and as side dishes and salads at meals to increase total intake.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;131(6):E963-73 [PMID: 22392502]
  2. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2278-86 [PMID: 20807832]
  3. Medscape J Med. 2009;11(1):26 [PMID: 19295947]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1357-63 [PMID: 21557868]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1293-300 [PMID: 22474042]
  6. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec 1;152(11):1081-92 [PMID: 11117618]
  7. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Feb;30(1):105-113 [PMID: 27334026]
  8. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):324-32 [PMID: 18689367]
  9. Br J Nutr. 2013 Feb 14;109(3):503-10 [PMID: 22717056]
  10. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006 Aug;25(4):354-61 [PMID: 16943458]
  11. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec;98(6):1514-23 [PMID: 24088718]
  12. Br J Nutr. 2011 Nov;106(10):1562-9 [PMID: 21676275]
  13. J Nutr. 2004 Jul;134(7):1779-85 [PMID: 15226469]
  14. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;31(1):121-130 [PMID: 28573733]
  15. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2535-9 [PMID: 27019390]
  16. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Sep;57(6):2055-2068 [PMID: 28616763]
  17. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 17;66(45):1241-1247 [PMID: 29145355]
  18. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Jul 10;64(26):709-13 [PMID: 26158351]
  19. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Feb;112(2):222-9 [PMID: 22741166]
  20. J Cancer Educ. 2007 Fall;22(3):177-80 [PMID: 17760525]
  21. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Sep;113(9):1194-9 [PMID: 23830325]
  22. Vital Health Stat 2. 2014 Mar;(162):1-33 [PMID: 25569458]
  23. Appetite. 2016 May 1;100:94-101 [PMID: 26850310]
  24. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(6):976-987 [PMID: 30767843]
  25. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1211-5 [PMID: 22818729]
  26. Br J Nutr. 2015 Apr 14;113(7):1129-38 [PMID: 25772260]
  27. Educ Gerontol. 2016;42(11):771-784 [PMID: 28642630]
  28. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Dec;15(12):2280-6 [PMID: 22443916]
  29. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(5):802-16 [PMID: 25118067]
  30. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jan;19(1):104-13 [PMID: 25742928]
  31. Int J Cancer. 2015 Dec 1;137(11):2705-14 [PMID: 26077137]
  32. Nutr J. 2018 Jul 10;17(1):67 [PMID: 29991345]
  33. Nutr Res. 2008 Aug;28(8):517-22 [PMID: 19083454]
  34. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jan;93(1):37-46 [PMID: 21068354]
  35. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Mar;114(3):430-5 [PMID: 24095620]
  36. Adv Nutr. 2013 May 01;4(3):384S-92S [PMID: 23674808]
  37. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Nov;59(11):1233-40 [PMID: 16015253]
  38. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Mar;69(3):440-7 [PMID: 10075328]
  39. BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 28;14:886 [PMID: 25168465]
  40. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Dec;119(12):2085-2092 [PMID: 31278048]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00FVintakevariety4fruitFVsadults13potatoesdishesvegetableslevelEatAmericaNHANEStotalmixeditems26respectivelyDietaryguidancehigherUnitedStatesdietary2013-2016consumedcountedVarietylevelshighmoderatelowCEamountsexcluding34%72%sidesaladsvegetableBACKGROUND:encouragesconsumingassociatednutrientadequacydescribedcontextOBJECTIVES:objectivestudydescribeconsumptionMETHODS:Onedaydataaged≥20y = 10064usedcountfoodscontributeddish≥5 = 23163-4 = 34231-2 = 3746DifferencescomparedtestRESULTS:Amongintakescupequivalents5percentagesreporting64%89%23%32%22%49%75%71%CONCLUSIONS:includewholefrequentlyresultssupportsuggestionsencouragingsnacksmealsincreaseFruitVegetableConsumptionUSAdultsLevel

Similar Articles

Cited By