Accuracy of consensual stereotypes in moral foundations: A gender analysis.

Farhan Niazi, Ayesha Inam, Zubaa Akhtar
Author Information
  1. Farhan Niazi: Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Tarlai Kalan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  2. Ayesha Inam: Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Tarlai Kalan, Islamabad, Pakistan. ORCID
  3. Zubaa Akhtar: Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Tarlai Kalan, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Abstract

The current study explored the accuracy of consensual moral stereotypes that women and men hold about each other, as well as whether the gender differences in morality found in previous literature replicate on a sample of Pakistani individuals. A sample of 300 was used with an equal number of men and women. Data from 50 of the respondents was collected online, whereas the rest was collected in person from universities. The 30-item Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ30) was used as a measure of five Moral Foundations, which are the basic elements of moral psychology as posited by Moral Foundations Theory. Men and women answered the questionnaire for themselves and then a second time, according to their perception of how a typical member of the other gender would respond which gave a measure of their stereotype. Comparison of actual scores of men and women revealed a statistically significant difference where women scored higher than men on the Harm foundation (p = 0.001). All other foundations, except for the Authority foundation showed the same pattern of differences as the previous literature, although they did not reach statistical significance. Stereotypes about men held by women were inaccurate underestimations on the Harm and Fairness foundations. The stereotype about women, held by men, was accurate on the Fairness foundation and inaccurate on the Authority foundation in the direction of underestimation. This research serves to further the study of Moral Foundations Theory as well as exploring the reasons behind the inaccurate moral stereotypes that men and women hold about each other, and actual gender differences in morality.

References

  1. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Apr;34(2):163-75 [PMID: 15162935]
  2. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):258-259 [PMID: 30575847]
  3. Cogn Process. 2010 Aug;11(3):219-26 [PMID: 19727878]
  4. Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e1 [PMID: 26079679]
  5. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):140-50 [PMID: 20089848]
  6. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Apr 01;14:53 [PMID: 24690271]
  7. Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):1-44 [PMID: 30596431]
  8. J Res Pers. 2013 Dec 1;47(6): [PMID: 24187394]
  9. Psychol Rev. 1993 Jan;100(1):109-28 [PMID: 8426877]
  10. Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):399-405 [PMID: 28597324]
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85 [PMID: 21244182]
  12. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:125-130 [PMID: 29506787]
  13. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092 [PMID: 23251357]
  14. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2005;51:73-117 [PMID: 16342419]
  15. J Appl Psychol. 1997 Dec;82(6):920-34 [PMID: 9638088]

MeSH Term

Attitude
Consensus
Data Accuracy
Female
Gender Identity
Humans
Male
Morals
Pakistan
Stereotyping
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0womenmenmoralgenderMoralFoundationsfoundationstereotypesdifferencesinaccuratestudyconsensualholdwellmoralitypreviousliteraturesampleusedcollectedmeasureTheorystereotypeactualHarmfoundationsAuthorityheldFairnesscurrentexploredaccuracywhetherfoundreplicatePakistaniindividuals300equalnumberData50respondentsonlinewhereasrestpersonuniversities30-itemQuestionnaireMFQ30fivebasicelementspsychologypositedMenansweredquestionnairesecondtimeaccordingperceptiontypicalmemberrespondgaveComparisonscoresrevealedstatisticallysignificantdifferencescoredhigherp=0001exceptshowedpatternalthoughreachstatisticalsignificanceStereotypesunderestimationsaccuratedirectionunderestimationresearchservesexploringreasonsbehindAccuracyfoundations:analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By