Microbial community structure and functional properties in permanently and seasonally flooded areas in Poyang Lake.

Yang Liu, Ze Ren, Xiaodong Qu, Min Zhang, Yang Yu, Yuhang Zhang, Wenqi Peng
Author Information
  1. Yang Liu: State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China.
  2. Ze Ren: Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, 519085, China. Ze.Ren@umontana.edu.
  3. Xiaodong Qu: State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China. quxiaodong@iwhr.com.
  4. Min Zhang: State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China.
  5. Yang Yu: State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China.
  6. Yuhang Zhang: State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China.
  7. Wenqi Peng: State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 100038, China.

Abstract

Water level fluctuations are an inherent feature regulating the ecological structures and functions of lakes. It is vital to understand the effects of water level fluctuations on bacterial communities and metabolic characteristics in freshwater lakes in a changing world. However, information on the microbial community structure and functional properties in permanently and seasonally flooded areas are lacking. Poyang Lake is a typical seasonal lake linked to the Yangtze River and is significantly affected by water level fluctuations. Bottom water was collected from 12 sampling sites: seven inundated for the whole year (inundated areas) and five drained during the dry season (emerged areas). High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to identify the bacterial communities. The results showed that the taxonomic structure and potential functions of the bacterial communities were significantly different between the inundated and emerged areas. Cyanobacteria was dominant in both areas, but the relative abundance of Cyanobacteria was much higher in the emerged areas than in the inundated areas. Bacterial communities were taxonomically sensitive in the inundated areas and functionally sensitive in the emerged areas. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and dissolved organic carbon concentrations and their ratios, as well as dissolved oxygen, played important roles in promoting the bacterial taxonomic and functional compositional patterns in both areas. According to the metabolic predictions based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, the relative abundance of functional genes related to assimilatory nitrate reduction in the emerged areas was higher than in the inundated areas, and the relative abundance of functional genes related to dissimilatory nitrate reduction in the inundated areas was higher. These differences might have been caused by the nitrogen differences between the permanently and seasonally flooded areas caused by intra-annual water level fluctuations. The relative abundance of functional genes associated with denitrification was not significantly different in the inundated and emerged areas. This study improved our knowledge of bacterial community structure and nitrogen metabolic processes in permanently and seasonally flooded areas caused by water level fluctuations in a seasonal lake.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0123179 [PMID: 25849814]
  2. mBio. 2016 Sep 27;7(5): [PMID: 27677797]
  3. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Dec;61(4):533-616 [PMID: 9409151]
  4. Mol Ecol. 2015 Jun;24(12):3170-80 [PMID: 25943298]
  5. Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5875 [PMID: 29651160]
  6. PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0196278 [PMID: 29791446]
  7. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 05;6:38709 [PMID: 27917954]
  8. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Oct;78(1):3-16 [PMID: 21707675]
  9. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 4;7(1):12668 [PMID: 28978929]
  10. Water Sci Technol. 2016 Dec;74(11):2582-2598 [PMID: 27973363]
  11. Nature. 2008 Jan 17;451(7176):293-6 [PMID: 18202647]
  12. J Contam Hydrol. 2017 Jul;202:59-69 [PMID: 28545847]
  13. mSystems. 2017 May 30;2(3): [PMID: 28593197]
  14. Front Microbiol. 2014 May 20;5:219 [PMID: 24904535]
  15. Environ Pollut. 2016 Dec;219:440-449 [PMID: 27256917]
  16. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 15;41(4):1225-31 [PMID: 17593723]
  17. Ecology. 2013 Mar;94(3):714-25 [PMID: 23687897]
  18. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct;81(20):7012-22 [PMID: 26231641]
  19. Front Microbiol. 2014 Aug 08;5:414 [PMID: 25152748]
  20. Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 04;8:1347 [PMID: 28824553]
  21. Microb Ecol. 2006 Oct;52(3):501-12 [PMID: 16897299]
  22. Nat Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 05;1(1):15 [PMID: 28812567]
  23. ISME J. 2016 Jul;10(7):1545-54 [PMID: 26771929]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82 [PMID: 16723398]
  25. Nature. 2008 Mar 13;452(7184):202-5 [PMID: 18337819]
  26. Front Microbiol. 2015 May 18;6:454 [PMID: 26042102]
  27. ISME J. 2013 Mar;7(3):680-4 [PMID: 23051691]
  28. Science. 2001 Apr 6;292(5514):86-90 [PMID: 11292868]
  29. Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1034-9 [PMID: 18497287]
  30. ISME J. 2012 May;6(5):1007-17 [PMID: 22134642]
  31. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Aug;16(8):471-483 [PMID: 29946124]
  32. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(34):34583-34594 [PMID: 30315531]
  33. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 15;8(1):760 [PMID: 29335587]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20404-9 [PMID: 18077371]
  35. Nature. 2009 May 14;459(7244):193-9 [PMID: 19444205]
  36. Ecotoxicology. 2018 Aug;27(6):752-760 [PMID: 29934736]
  37. Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21 [PMID: 23975157]
  38. R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 11;4(1):160768 [PMID: 28280580]
  39. Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 22;8:2319 [PMID: 29213266]
  40. J Environ Sci (China). 2019 Feb;76:319-328 [PMID: 30528023]
  41. Nature. 2011 Sep 14;478(7368):233-5 [PMID: 21918515]
  42. Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 25;8:2099 [PMID: 29118751]
  43. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30 [PMID: 10592173]
  44. Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1039-43 [PMID: 18497288]
  45. Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Dec 15;38(24):6460-7 [PMID: 15669300]
  46. Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6 [PMID: 20383131]
  47. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21390-5 [PMID: 23236140]
  48. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Sep;16(9):567-576 [PMID: 29789680]
  49. Nature. 2006 Jul 20;442(7100):259-64 [PMID: 16855581]
  50. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:749-759 [PMID: 29649719]
  51. Environ Microbiol. 2004 Dec;6(12):1228-43 [PMID: 15560821]
  52. Front Microbiol. 2019 May 21;10:1167 [PMID: 31164883]
  53. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 8;7(1):15117 [PMID: 29118402]
  54. Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200 [PMID: 21700674]

MeSH Term

China
Cyanobacteria
Floods
Fresh Water
Genes, Bacterial
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Lakes
Microbiota
Nitrates
Nitrogen
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Seasons
Water Microbiology
Wetlands

Chemicals

Nitrates
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Nitrogen