Georeferencing of Personal Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields from Wi-Fi in a University Area.

Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez, Sameer Arabasi, Hussein Al-Taani, Suhad Sbeih, Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio, Isabel Escobar, Enrique Arribas
Author Information
  1. Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez: Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. de Espa��a s/n, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain.
  2. Sameer Arabasi: School of Basic Sciences and Humanities, German Jordanian University, Amman Madaba Street, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, Jordan. ORCID
  3. Hussein Al-Taani: School of Basic Sciences and Humanities, German Jordanian University, Amman Madaba Street, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, Jordan. ORCID
  4. Suhad Sbeih: School of Basic Sciences and Humanities, German Jordanian University, Amman Madaba Street, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, Jordan. ORCID
  5. Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio: Medical Science Department, School of Medicine, University of Castilla-La Mancha, C/ Almansa 14, 02071 Albacete, Spain.
  6. Isabel Escobar: Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. de Espa��a s/n, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain. ORCID
  7. Enrique Arribas: Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Computer Science, Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. de Espa��a s/n, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

In the last two decades, due to the development of the information society, the massive increase in the use of information technologies, including the connection and communication of multiple electronic devices, highlighting Wi-Fi networks, as well as the emerging technological advances of 4G and 5G (new-generation mobile phones that will use 5G), have caused a significant increase in the personal exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF), and as a consequence, increasing discussions about the possible adverse health effects. The main objective of this study was to measure the personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from the Wi-Fi in the university area of German Jordanian University (GJU) and prepare georeferenced maps of the registered intensity levels and to compare them with the basic international restrictions. Spot measurements were made outside the university area at German Jordanian University. Measurements were made in the whole university area and around two buildings. Two Satimo EME SPY 140 (Brest, France) personal exposimeters were used, and the measurements were performed in the morning and afternoon, and on weekends and weekdays. The total average personal exposure to RF-EMF from the Wi-Fi band registered in the three study areas and in the four days measured was 28.82 ��W/m. The average total exposure from the Wi-Fi band registered in the ten measured points of the university area of GJU was 22.97 ��W/m, the one registered in the eight measured points of building H was 34.48 ��W/m, and the one registered in the eight points of building C was 29.00 ��W/m. The maximum average values registered in the campus of GJU are below the guidelines allowed by International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The measurement protocol used in this work has been applied in measurements already carried out in Spain and Mexico, and it is applicable in university areas of other countries.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Phys. 2013 Mar;104(3):293-301 [PMID: 23361425]
  2. Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):216-226 [PMID: 30216774]
  3. Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:388-97 [PMID: 27136346]
  4. J Vis Exp. 2018 May 2;(135): [PMID: 29781983]
  5. Environ Int. 2010 Oct;36(7):714-20 [PMID: 20538340]
  6. Environ Res. 2009 Aug;109(6):779-85 [PMID: 19476932]
  7. Environ Int. 2014 Jul;68:49-54 [PMID: 24704639]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 15;612:368-369 [PMID: 28858746]
  9. Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:639 [PMID: 30173116]
  10. Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108517 [PMID: 31202043]
  11. Environ Int. 2017 Feb;99:303-314 [PMID: 28038972]
  12. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013 Nov;113(2):254-63 [PMID: 23872299]
  13. Environ Res. 2019 Jan;168:428-438 [PMID: 30390565]
  14. Health Phys. 2009 Apr;96(4):504-14 [PMID: 19276710]
  15. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;28(2):147-160 [PMID: 28766560]
  16. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:1544-1551 [PMID: 30857115]
  17. Environ Res. 2019 May;172:109-116 [PMID: 30782530]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 12;15(10): [PMID: 30321997]
  19. Environ Int. 2014 Jun;67:22-6 [PMID: 24632329]
  20. Environ Res. 2018 Feb;161:136-143 [PMID: 29145005]
  21. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 Dec;107(3):412-20 [PMID: 21856328]
  22. Health Phys. 2013 Dec;105(6):561-75 [PMID: 24162060]
  23. Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:289-298 [PMID: 27336233]
  24. Environ Int. 2018 Aug;117:204-214 [PMID: 29754001]
  25. Environ Res. 2018 Jul;164:405-416 [PMID: 29573716]
  26. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Mar;222(2):188-194 [PMID: 30314943]
  27. Environ Res. 2016 Aug;149:105-112 [PMID: 27196609]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2013 Feb 15;445-446:202-9 [PMID: 23333516]
  29. Environ Int. 2018 Sep;118:60-69 [PMID: 29803802]
  30. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Dec;33(4):252-63 [PMID: 23915231]
  31. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):887-896F [PMID: 21124713]
  32. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016 Jul;37(5):298-309 [PMID: 27121268]
  33. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010 May;31(4):286-95 [PMID: 20041435]
  34. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Dec 15;408(1):102-8 [PMID: 19819523]
  35. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jan;163(1):70-80 [PMID: 24723195]
  36. Environ Res. 2008 Jun;107(2):277-87 [PMID: 18359015]
  37. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Dec 1;182(4):494-501 [PMID: 30007352]
  38. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr;6(4):462-476 [PMID: 28413651]
  39. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018 Oct;39(7):529-538 [PMID: 30334586]
  40. Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:279 [PMID: 29214149]
  41. Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:266-273 [PMID: 31146098]
  42. Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):297-307 [PMID: 30227317]
  43. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Sep;29(6):471-8 [PMID: 18421711]
  44. Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 2;192(2):77 [PMID: 31897614]
  45. Environ Health. 2010 May 20;9:23 [PMID: 20487532]
  46. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):37-44 [PMID: 23942394]
  47. Environ Int. 2018 May;114:297-306 [PMID: 29529581]
  48. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018 Apr;221(3):367-375 [PMID: 29402696]
  49. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;599-600:834-843 [PMID: 28499231]
  50. Health Phys. 2014 Dec;107(6):503-13 [PMID: 25353235]
  51. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;16(12): [PMID: 31200442]
  52. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013 May;34(4):300-11 [PMID: 23315952]
  53. Environ Int. 2016 Sep;94:724-735 [PMID: 27356850]

MeSH Term

Cell Phone
Electromagnetic Fields
Environmental Exposure
France
Geographic Mapping
Humans
Mexico
Radio Waves
Spain
Universities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0registeredWi-Fipersonalexposureuniversityarea��W/mUniversityGJUmeasurementsaveragemeasuredpointstwoinformationincreaseuse5GRadiofrequencyElectromagneticFieldsRF-EMFstudyradiofrequencyelectromagneticfieldsGermanJordanianmadeusedtotalbandareasoneeightbuildinglastdecadesduedevelopmentsocietymassivetechnologiesincludingconnectioncommunicationmultipleelectronicdeviceshighlightingnetworkswellemergingtechnologicaladvances4Gnew-generationmobilephoneswillcausedsignificantconsequenceincreasingdiscussionspossibleadversehealtheffectsmainobjectivemeasurepreparegeoreferencedmapsintensitylevelscomparebasicinternationalrestrictionsSpotoutsideMeasurementswholearoundbuildingsTwoSatimoEMESPY140BrestFranceexposimetersperformedmorningafternoonweekendsweekdaysthreefourdays2882ten2297H3448C2900maximumvaluescampusguidelinesallowedInternationalCommissionNon-ionizingRadiationProtectionICNIRPmeasurementprotocolworkappliedalreadycarriedSpainMexicoapplicablecountriesGeoreferencingPersonalExposureAreamicroenvironmentpublicexposimeter

Similar Articles

Cited By