Sexual selection on bushcricket genitalia operates in a mosaic pattern.

Nadja C Wulff, Gerlind U C Lehmann
Author Information
  1. Nadja C Wulff: Department of Biology, Evolutionary Ecology Humboldt University Berlin Berlin Germany.
  2. Gerlind U C Lehmann: Department of Biology, Evolutionary Ecology Humboldt University Berlin Berlin Germany. ORCID

Abstract

In most species with internal fertilization, male genitalia evolve faster than other morphological structures. This holds true for genital titillators, which are used exclusively during mating in several bushcricket subfamilies. Several theories have been proposed for the sexual selection forces driving the evolution of internal genitalia, especially sperm competition, sexually antagonistic coevolution (SAC), and cryptic female choice (CFC). However, it is unclear whether the evolution of genitalia can be described with a single hypothesis or a combination of them. The study of species-specific genitalia action could contribute to the controversial debate about the underlying selective evolutionary forces. We studied female mating behaviors in response to experimentally modified titillators in a phylogenetically nested set of four bushcricket species: , , (of the subfamily Tettigoniinae), and (Phaneropterinae). Bushcricket titillators have several potential functions; they stimulate females and suppress female resistance, ensure proper ampulla or spermatophore attachment, and facilitate male fixation. In , titillators stimulate females to accept copulations, supporting sexual selection by CFC. Conversely, titillator modification had no observable effect on the female's behavior in The titillators of mechanically support the mating position and the spermatophore transfer, pointing to sexual selection by SAC. Mixed support was found in , where manipulation resulted in increased female resistance (evidence for CFC) and mating failures by reduced spermatophore transfer success (evidence for SAC). Sexual selection is highly species-specific with a mosaic support for either cryptic female choice or sexually antagonistic coevolution or a combination of both in the four species.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.crjdfn31f

References

  1. Integr Comp Biol. 2016 Oct;56(4):669-81 [PMID: 27252198]
  2. Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 25;10(5):2320-2338 [PMID: 32184984]
  3. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 07;7:42345 [PMID: 28169372]
  4. J Evol Biol. 2003 Jan;16(1):1-6 [PMID: 14635875]
  5. Integr Comp Biol. 2016 Oct;56(4):741-51 [PMID: 27600556]
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 15;285(1884): [PMID: 30111598]
  7. Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Aug 1;57(2):407-422 [PMID: 28859419]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1:10025-32 [PMID: 19528642]
  9. Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 15;19(17):1442-6 [PMID: 19664925]
  10. Evolution. 2019 Dec;73(12):2415-2435 [PMID: 31599962]
  11. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2015 Jul;44(4):388-97 [PMID: 26014975]
  12. J Insect Physiol. 2009 Nov;55(11):989-96 [PMID: 19607835]
  13. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):87-93 [PMID: 16701234]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 May 31;284(1855): [PMID: 28539510]
  15. Genetica. 2010 Jan;138(1):1-4 [PMID: 20050219]
  16. Integr Comp Biol. 2016 Oct;56(4):630-4 [PMID: 27471228]
  17. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Jul 01;7(7):a017749 [PMID: 26134314]
  18. Front Zool. 2012 Aug 15;9(1):19 [PMID: 22894685]
  19. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Sep;17(5):1037-1053 [PMID: 27863033]
  20. Genetica. 2010 Jan;138(1):5-18 [PMID: 19308664]
  21. Evolution. 2012 Jan;66(1):40-54 [PMID: 22220863]
  22. Science. 1979 Mar 2;203(4383):916-8 [PMID: 17771731]
  23. Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):787-9 [PMID: 11845208]
  24. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232-4 [PMID: 8622764]
  25. J Evol Biol. 2009 Jul;22(7):1516-25 [PMID: 19467130]
  26. Zootaxa. 2014 Jun 13;(3815):151-99 [PMID: 24943608]
  27. Evolution. 2014 Jul;68(7):2052-65 [PMID: 24724547]
  28. J Evol Biol. 2019 Sep;32(9):882-899 [PMID: 31267594]
  29. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jan;26(1):17-21 [PMID: 21093955]
  30. J Evol Biol. 2011 Sep;24(9):1960-8 [PMID: 21658143]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0selectiongenitaliatitillatorsfemalesexualmatingbushcricketantagonisticcoevolutionSACcrypticchoiceCFCspermatophoresupportmosaicspeciesinternalmaleseveralforcesevolutionsexuallycombinationspecies-specificfourstimulatefemalesresistancetransferevidenceSexualfertilizationevolvefastermorphologicalstructuresholdstruegenitalusedexclusivelysubfamiliesSeveraltheoriesproposeddrivingespeciallyspermcompetitionHoweverunclearwhethercandescribedsinglehypothesisstudyactioncontributecontroversialdebateunderlyingselectiveevolutionarystudiedbehaviorsresponseexperimentallymodifiedphylogeneticallynestedsetspecies:subfamilyTettigoniinaePhaneropterinaeBushcricketpotentialfunctionssuppressensureproperampullaattachmentfacilitatefixationacceptcopulationssupportingConverselytitillatormodificationobservableeffectfemale'sbehaviormechanicallypositionpointingMixedfoundmanipulationresultedincreasedfailuresreducedsuccesshighlyeitheroperatespatterncopulatorycourtship

Similar Articles

Cited By