The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report.

Morgana Sluydts, Anja Bernaerts, Bert De Foer, Andrzej Zarowski, Joost van Dinther, Robby Vanspauwen, Erwin Offeciers
Author Information
  1. Morgana Sluydts: Department of ENT, European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  2. Anja Bernaerts: Department of Radiology, GZA Hospitals Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  3. Bert De Foer: Department of Radiology, GZA Hospitals Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  4. Andrzej Zarowski: Department of ENT, European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  5. Joost van Dinther: Department of ENT, European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  6. Robby Vanspauwen: Department of ENT, European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium.
  7. Erwin Offeciers: Department of ENT, European Institute for Otorhinolaryngology, Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Abstract

In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incudis caused a real conductive hearing loss in the left ear. A diminished left AC cVEMP was thus expected, but the opposite was shown (increased corrected amplitude, lowered detection threshold). The patient only experienced hearing loss, so middle ear surgery was performed to repair the lysis. The postoperative AC cVEMP showed a further "uncovering" of the SCD with increased corrected amplitude on the left but no vestibular symptoms. The significance of an SCD should be interpreted with caution, even when the AC cVEMP and the imaging are significant. Furthermore, AC cVEMPs should not be considered as evidence for the absence or presence of conductive hearing loss.

References

  1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May;156(5):962-963 [PMID: 28418791]
  2. Otol Neurotol. 2017 Sep;38(8):1071-1075 [PMID: 28657952]
  3. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Apr;31(3):447-54 [PMID: 20118818]
  4. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(6):633-40 [PMID: 10586994]
  5. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Mar;124(3):249-58 [PMID: 9525507]
  6. Otol Neurotol. 2018 Oct;39(9):1153-1162 [PMID: 30124614]
  7. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Aug;35(7):1163-7 [PMID: 24979129]
  8. Otol Neurotol. 2003 Mar;24(2):270-8 [PMID: 12621343]

MeSH Term

Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Ear, Middle
Female
Hearing Loss, Conductive
Humans
Incus
Middle Aged
Otosclerosis
Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ACcVEMPleftSCDhearinglossvestibularevenFurthermorelysisconductiveearincreasedcorrectedamplitudecasereportair-conductedcervicalevokedmyogenicpotentialstestsensitivesuperiorsemicircularcanaldehiscencethoughcontralateralequallength25mmprocessuslenticularisincudiscausedrealdiminishedthusexpectedoppositeshownlowereddetectionthresholdpatientexperiencedmiddlesurgeryperformedrepairpostoperativeshowed"uncovering"symptomssignificanceinterpretedcautionimagingsignificantcVEMPsconsideredevidenceabsencepresenceSensitivityTestDetectingSuperiorSemicircularCanalDehiscenceInfluenceCoexistingIncudalLysis:CaseReport

Similar Articles

Cited By