Multi-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Primary Motor Cortex Facilitates Sequence Learning, Chunking, and One Year Retention.

Brian Greeley, Jonathan S Barnhoorn, Willem B Verwey, Rachael D Seidler
Author Information
  1. Brian Greeley: School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  2. Jonathan S Barnhoorn: Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
  3. Willem B Verwey: Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
  4. Rachael D Seidler: School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) can facilitate motor learning, but it has not been established how stimulation to other brain regions impacts online and offline motor sequence learning, as well as long-term retention. Here, we completed three experiments comparing the effects of tDCS and sham stimulation to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), M1, and the supplementary motor area complex to understand the contributions of these brain regions to motor sequence learning. In Experiment 1, we found that both left and right PFC tDCS groups displayed a slowing in learning in both reaction time and number of chunks, whereas stimulation over M1 improved both metrics over the course of three sessions. To better understand the sequence learning impairment of left PFC anodal stimulation, we tested a left PFC cathodal tDCS group in Experiment 2. The cathodal group demonstrated learning impairments similar to the left PFC anodal stimulation group. In Experiment 3, a subset of participants from the left PFC, M1, and sham tDCS groups of Experiment 1 returned to complete a single session without tDCS on the same sequences assigned to them 1 year previously. We found that the M1 tDCS group reduced reaction time at a faster rate relative to the sham and left PFC groups, demonstrating faster relearning after a one-year delay. Thus, our findings suggest that, regardless of the polarity of stimulation, tDCS to PFC impairs sequence learning, whereas stimulation to M1 facilitates learning and relearning, especially in terms of chunk formation.

Keywords

References

  1. J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1987-2000 [PMID: 23339180]
  2. J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 10;33(28):11425-31 [PMID: 23843514]
  3. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43-6 [PMID: 2081237]
  4. Brain. 1997 Jan;120 ( Pt 1):123-40 [PMID: 9055803]
  5. Brain Stimul. 2013 Mar;6(2):101-7 [PMID: 22659022]
  6. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):13-20 [PMID: 25467129]
  7. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997 Jul;41(3):204-10 [PMID: 10232763]
  8. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 19;7:82 [PMID: 23515430]
  9. Exp Brain Res. 1996;107(3):479-85 [PMID: 8821387]
  10. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):252-263 [PMID: 21962981]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):54-77 [PMID: 25421407]
  12. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):161-7 [PMID: 15831397]
  13. J Neural Eng. 2019 Jul 30;16(5):056006 [PMID: 31071686]
  14. J Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;82(2):1063-8 [PMID: 10444698]
  15. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jan 1;636:165-169 [PMID: 27838447]
  16. Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1453-74 [PMID: 16571375]
  17. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Mar;8(1):6-16 [PMID: 12009178]
  18. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Aug;35(8):3673-86 [PMID: 24453107]
  19. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jan;216(1):1-10 [PMID: 21989847]
  20. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):701-25 [PMID: 11757876]
  21. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2671-87 [PMID: 9819272]
  22. J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 28;27(13):3429-38 [PMID: 17392459]
  23. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:229-38 [PMID: 24486768]
  24. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):800-804 [PMID: 21335013]
  25. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:3616807 [PMID: 27242932]
  26. Neuroscience. 2017 Feb 20;343:269-275 [PMID: 28003159]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):861-8 [PMID: 9448252]
  28. J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 16;30(24):8332-41 [PMID: 20554884]
  29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1158-64 [PMID: 19413472]
  30. J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):234-47 [PMID: 18867059]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 20;109(12):4401-6 [PMID: 22393013]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5632-7 [PMID: 17369358]
  33. Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):99-111 [PMID: 14741647]
  34. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Feb;19(1):138-153 [PMID: 30406305]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1498-1508 [PMID: 28253083]
  36. Neuron. 2012 Jun 7;74(5):936-46 [PMID: 22681696]
  37. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;22(3):427-36 [PMID: 19301999]
  38. Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81 [PMID: 9384378]
  39. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 22;3:91 [PMID: 23097644]
  40. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Sep;28(9):1419-32 [PMID: 27167403]
  41. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;102(5):2744-54 [PMID: 19726728]
  42. Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 15;87:332-44 [PMID: 24246487]
  43. Brain Res. 1995 Jul 3;684(2):206-8 [PMID: 7583224]
  44. J Neurol Sci. 2006 Nov 1;249(1):31-8 [PMID: 16843494]
  45. J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 17;31(33):11808-13 [PMID: 21849541]
  46. Cereb Cortex. 2004 Feb;14(2):199-208 [PMID: 14704217]
  47. Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1180-9 [PMID: 21867758]
  48. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1590-5 [PMID: 19164589]
  49. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Sep 26;490(3):305-33 [PMID: 16082679]
  50. Neuroscientist. 2007 Jun;13(3):280-91 [PMID: 17519370]
  51. J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 21;24(29):6515-20 [PMID: 15269262]
  52. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53 [PMID: 21343407]
  53. Behav Brain Res. 1985 Nov-Dec;18(2):143-57 [PMID: 4096829]
  54. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Oct 15;112(8):1849-56 [PMID: 25080566]
  55. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 [PMID: 15817019]
  56. J Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb 1;113(3):780-5 [PMID: 25376785]
  57. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30971 [PMID: 22303478]
  58. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Feb;234(2):353-66 [PMID: 26487177]
  59. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 [PMID: 10990547]
  60. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Apr 11;7:6 [PMID: 23596399]
  61. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1687-97 [PMID: 18345990]
  62. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Aug;4(8):637-48 [PMID: 12894239]
  63. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42993 [PMID: 22952624]
  64. Exp Brain Res. 1984;56(3):410-24 [PMID: 6094229]
  65. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]
  66. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Jul;92(1):35-44 [PMID: 19249378]
  67. J Neurophysiol. 2019 May 1;121(5):1906-1916 [PMID: 30917064]
  68. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 15;257:208-14 [PMID: 24064279]
  69. Neuron. 2003 Jan 23;37(2):361-7 [PMID: 12546829]
  70. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Mar;10(1):42-54 [PMID: 15053701]
  71. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1268-76 [PMID: 11931929]
  72. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1451-60 [PMID: 12205165]
  73. Cortex. 2015 Feb;63:145-54 [PMID: 25282053]
  74. Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Aug;42(3):1889-94 [PMID: 25940532]
  75. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 14;8(6):e65882 [PMID: 23799058]
  76. Neurosci Lett. 2013 Feb 28;539:7-10 [PMID: 23416318]
  77. Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct;48(8):2684-2695 [PMID: 28921756]
  78. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 01;7:333 [PMID: 23847505]
  79. Brain. 1998 Nov;121 ( Pt 11):2159-73 [PMID: 9827775]
  80. J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 7;38(6):1430-1442 [PMID: 29305534]
  81. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):619-26 [PMID: 12803972]
  82. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):978-93 [PMID: 14573560]
  83. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 22;29(16):5202-6 [PMID: 19386916]
  84. Neurology. 2001 Dec 11;57(11):2054-63 [PMID: 11739825]
  85. Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):277-82 [PMID: 25499036]
  86. J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 15;34(3):1037-50 [PMID: 24431461]
  87. Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Aug;42(3):1887-8 [PMID: 25989283]
  88. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Fall;7(4):497-510 [PMID: 23961907]
  89. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):784-6 [PMID: 25857398]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tDCSlearningPFCstimulationmotorM1leftsequencecortexExperimentgroupsham1groupsTranscranialprimarybrainregionsthreeprefrontalunderstandfoundreactiontimewhereasanodalcathodalfasterrelearningdirectcurrentcanfacilitateestablishedimpactsonlineofflinewelllong-termretentioncompletedexperimentscomparingeffectssupplementaryareacomplexcontributionsrightdisplayedslowingnumberchunksimprovedmetricscoursesessionsbetterimpairmenttested2demonstratedimpairmentssimilar3subsetparticipantsreturnedcompletesinglesessionwithoutsequencesassignedyearpreviouslyreducedraterelativedemonstratingone-yeardelayThusfindingssuggestregardlesspolarityimpairsfacilitatesespeciallytermschunkformationMulti-sessionDirectCurrentStimulationPrimaryMotorCortexFacilitatesSequenceLearningChunkingOneYearRetentionchunking

Similar Articles

Cited By