Effects of Olfactory and Auditory Enrichment on the Behaviour of Shelter Dogs.

Veronica Amaya, Mandy B A Paterson, Clive J C Phillips
Author Information
  1. Veronica Amaya: Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, University of Queensland, White House Building (8134), Gatton Campus, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
  2. Mandy B A Paterson: Royal Society for the prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4076, Australia.
  3. Clive J C Phillips: Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, University of Queensland, White House Building (8134), Gatton Campus, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.

Abstract

Shelter environments are stressful for dogs, as they must cope with many stimuli over which they have little control. This can lead to behavioural changes, negatively affect their welfare and downgrade the human-animal bond, affecting re-homing success. Arousal is evident in their behaviour, particularly increased activity and frequent vocalisation. Environmental enrichment plays an important role in reducing arousal behaviour, either through direct physiological effects or by masking stressful stimuli. The present study focused on sensory environmental enrichment, using olfactory and auditory stimuli under shelter conditions. Sixty dogs were allocated to one of four treatments: three types of enrichment, Lavender, Dog appeasing pheromone (DAP) and Music, and a Control group. Stimuli were applied for 3 h/d on five consecutive days. Dogs exposed to DAP lay down more, and those exposed to Music lay down more with their head down, compared to the Control. Those in the Control stood more on their hind legs with their front legs on the exit door, compared to those exposed to Music and DAP, particularly if they had only been in the shelter for a short time. They also panted and vocalised much more than dogs in the three enrichment treatments, which tended to persist during the 4 h period post treatment, and in the case of vocalisation into the subsequent night. The study suggests that all three enrichments had some positive benefits for dogs in shelters, as well as being non-invasive and easy to apply in the shelter environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Physiol Behav. 1999 Apr;66(2):233-42 [PMID: 10336149]
  2. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e114319 [PMID: 25551460]
  3. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Feb;21(2):77-82 [PMID: 16701478]
  4. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014 May;20(2):130-4 [PMID: 24767959]
  5. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1982 Aug;57(Pt 3):395-421 [PMID: 6753960]
  6. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001 Aug 1;73(3):217-233 [PMID: 11376839]
  7. Physiol Behav. 2014 Jun 22;133:260-71 [PMID: 24866912]
  8. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 1991 Nov-Dec;46(11-12):1067-72 [PMID: 1817516]
  9. Physiol Behav. 2012 Mar 20;105(5):1117-23 [PMID: 22192707]
  10. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008 Jul;72(7):1944-7 [PMID: 18603803]
  11. Anim Cogn. 2015 Nov;18(6):1317-29 [PMID: 26169659]
  12. Physiol Behav. 2005 Sep 15;86(1-2):92-5 [PMID: 16095639]
  13. Physiol Behav. 2016 May 15;159:95-103 [PMID: 26996275]
  14. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996 Aug 15;209(4):738-42 [PMID: 8756871]
  15. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Sep 15;229(6):964-7 [PMID: 16978115]
  16. Vet Rec. 2006 Jul 29;159(5):143-8 [PMID: 16877680]
  17. Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):198-201 [PMID: 19596426]
  18. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Aug;54(4):393-7 [PMID: 10997854]
  19. Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 28;9(11): [PMID: 31661840]
  20. Mol Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;32(3):285-94 [PMID: 16385142]
  21. Sleep Med Clin. 2007 Jun;2(2):125-145 [PMID: 18516219]
  22. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Jun 15;236(12):1308-16 [PMID: 20550445]
  23. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Dec 15;233(12):1874-82 [PMID: 19072600]
  24. Chem Senses. 2005 Oct;30(8):683-91 [PMID: 16162642]
  25. J Altern Complement Med. 1998 Fall;4(3):271-5 [PMID: 9764765]
  26. Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 21;36(44):3043-9 [PMID: 26354957]
  27. Int J Neurosci. 2003 Jan;113(1):15-38 [PMID: 12690999]
  28. Biol Psychol. 2005 Sep;70(1):61-6 [PMID: 16038775]
  29. Physiol Behav. 2007 Dec 5;92(5):847-54 [PMID: 17617429]
  30. J Forensic Sci. 2004 Mar;49(2):300-6 [PMID: 15027550]
  31. Physiol Behav. 2006 May 30;87(5):911-6 [PMID: 16603208]
  32. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163620 [PMID: 27732667]
  33. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003 Mar;33(2):187-211 [PMID: 12701508]
  34. Phytomedicine. 2007 Sep;14(9):613-20 [PMID: 17482442]
  35. Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Dec;93(3):713-8 [PMID: 11806592]
  36. Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Aug;85(1):287-96 [PMID: 9293589]
  37. Br J Med Psychol. 1992 Jun;65 ( Pt 2):197-9 [PMID: 1633124]
  38. Physiol Behav. 2017 Mar 15;171:207-215 [PMID: 28093218]
  39. Physiol Behav. 2006 Oct 30;89(3):385-91 [PMID: 16905163]
  40. Physiol Behav. 2015 May 1;143:70-82 [PMID: 25708275]
  41. Physiol Behav. 1997 Sep;62(3):485-90 [PMID: 9272654]
  42. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009 Jul;5(7):374-81 [PMID: 19488073]
  43. World Neurosurg. 2010 May;73(5):454-5 [PMID: 20920919]
  44. Nurs Forum. 1981;20(3):252-66 [PMID: 6926532]
  45. J Pharm Sci. 1993 Jun;82(6):660-4 [PMID: 8331544]
  46. Physiol Behav. 1997 Nov;62(5):963-71 [PMID: 9333188]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dogsenrichmentshelterDAPstimulibehaviourthreeMusicControlexposedShelterstressfulparticularlyvocalisationarousalstudyappeasingpheromoneDogslaycomparedlegsdogenvironmentsmustcopemanylittlecontrolcanleadbehaviouralchangesnegativelyaffectwelfaredowngradehuman-animalbondaffectingre-homingsuccessArousalevidentincreasedactivityfrequentEnvironmentalplaysimportantrolereducingeitherdirectphysiologicaleffectsmaskingpresentfocusedsensoryenvironmentalusingolfactoryauditoryconditionsSixtyallocatedonefourtreatments:typesLavenderDoggroupStimuliapplied3h/dfiveconsecutivedaysheadstoodhindfrontexitdoorshorttimealsopantedvocalisedmuchtreatmentstendedpersist4hperiodposttreatmentcasesubsequentnightsuggestsenrichmentspositivebenefitsshelterswellnon-invasiveeasyapplyenvironmentEffectsOlfactoryAuditoryEnrichmentBehaviourlavendermusicstress

Similar Articles

Cited By