Bean Preferences Vary by Acculturation Level among Latinas and by Ethnicity with Non-Hispanic White Women.

Michelle M Heer, Donna M Winham
Author Information
  1. Michelle M Heer: Food Science & Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
  2. Donna M Winham: Food Science & Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA. ORCID

Abstract

With high levels of protein, fiber, folate, iron and other micronutrients, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends eating beans for optimal nutrition. Low-income women are at greater risk of nutrition-related health disparities. Use of beans may change among Hispanic women (Latinas) during acculturation, but few studies exist that describe specific preferences of this important traditional food. Preserving or promoting beans in the diets of all low-income women could improve dietary quality. The study objectives were to describe consumption frequency, purchasing patterns, and attitudes toward dry and canned beans, by acculturation level among Latinas and by ethnicity with non-Hispanic White women. Survey data were collected from 356 women (µ 32 y ± 9 y; 81% Latina), who were enrolled in, or eligible for, a federal nutrition assistance, or unemployment, program in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Participants had positive attitudes toward beans overall. Less acculturated and bicultural Latinas bought dry beans more often than their peers. Price was considered important in canned bean selection for Non-Hispanic White women, and less acculturated Latinas had poorer attitudes toward canned. Awareness of these attitudes and preferred traits of low-income women suggests ways to message populations to maintain or increase bean consumption. Negative views of canned beans by Latinas should be investigated further. Inclusion of canned beans in nutrition assistance programs may benefit those unfamiliar with preparing dry beans.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Jul;40(1):48-57 [PMID: 6430062]
  2. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Feb;113(2):297-306 [PMID: 23168270]
  3. J Pers. 2008 Jul;76(4):803-38 [PMID: 18482355]
  4. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2001 Winter;62(4):193-8 [PMID: 11742561]
  5. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Mar;118(3):431-439 [PMID: 29289549]
  6. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Aug;108(8):1330-44 [PMID: 18656573]
  7. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2014 Dec;75(4):218-21 [PMID: 26067078]
  8. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017 May;14(5):338-341 [PMID: 28630613]
  9. Nutrients. 2018 Aug 17;10(8): [PMID: 30126084]
  10. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Mar;105(3):404-11; discussion 411-2 [PMID: 15746828]
  11. Am J Health Behav. 2018 May 1;42(3):56-68 [PMID: 29663981]
  12. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 May 05;6:24 [PMID: 19416525]
  13. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Mar;149(3):274-5 [PMID: 23553171]
  14. Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb;25(2):259-68 [PMID: 11815493]
  15. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Mar;1392(1):58-66 [PMID: 28146277]
  16. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 May;109(5):909-13 [PMID: 19394480]
  17. J Nutr. 2011 Oct;141(10):1898-906 [PMID: 21880951]
  18. Nutrients. 2018 Nov 01;10(11): [PMID: 30388772]
  19. Health Educ Behav. 2019 Feb;46(1):24-31 [PMID: 30227081]
  20. Nutrients. 2015 Jul 09;7(7):5586-600 [PMID: 26184294]
  21. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):13-21 [PMID: 21658831]
  22. Appetite. 2019 Jan 1;132:8-17 [PMID: 30248440]
  23. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Aug;102(8):1105-18 [PMID: 12171455]
  24. J Nutr. 2003 Apr;133(4):1192-7 [PMID: 12672942]
  25. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 28;11(1):e0147592 [PMID: 26820889]
  26. Nutrients. 2019 Jan 15;11(1): [PMID: 30650616]

MeSH Term

Acculturation
Arizona
Ethnicity
Female
Health Status Disparities
Hispanic or Latino
Humans
Nutritional Status
United States
White People

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0beanswomenLatinascannednutritionattitudesamongacculturationtowarddryWhiteAmericanshealthdisparitiesmaydescribepreferencesimportantfoodlow-incomedietaryconsumptionyassistanceacculturatedbeanNon-HispanichighlevelsproteinfiberfolateironmicronutrientsDietaryGuidelinesrecommendseatingoptimalLow-incomegreaterrisknutrition-relatedUsechangeHispanicstudiesexistspecifictraditionalPreservingpromotingdietsimprovequalitystudyobjectivesfrequencypurchasingpatternslevelethnicitynon-HispanicSurveydatacollected356µ32±981%LatinaenrolledeligiblefederalunemploymentprogramPhoenixArizonaUSAParticipantspositiveoverallLessbiculturalboughtoftenpeersPriceconsideredselectionlesspoorerAwarenesspreferredtraitssuggestswaysmessagepopulationsmaintainincreaseNegativeviewsinvestigatedInclusionprogramsbenefitunfamiliarpreparingBeanPreferencesVaryAcculturationLevelEthnicityWomenMexicanfoodsconsumersecurityimmigrantsknowledgepulses

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)