The Effects of Low- and High-Glycemic Index Sport Nutrition Bars on Metabolism and Performance in Recreational Soccer Players.

Mojtaba Kaviani, Philip D Chilibeck, Spencer Gall, Jennifer Jochim, Gordon A Zello
Author Information
  1. Mojtaba Kaviani: School of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Pure & Applied Science, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, NS B4P 2R6, Canada. ORCID
  2. Philip D Chilibeck: College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, 87 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada.
  3. Spencer Gall: College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, 87 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada.
  4. Jennifer Jochim: College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, 87 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada.
  5. Gordon A Zello: College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada.

Abstract

Consumption of low-glycemic index (GI) carbohydrates (CHO) may be superior to high-GI CHO before exercise by increasing fat oxidation and decreasing carbohydrate oxidation. We compared the effects of pre-exercise feeding of a low-GI lentil-based sports nutrition bar with a high-GI bar on metabolism and performance during a simulated soccer match. Using a randomized, double-blind, counterbalanced, crossover design, Participants ( = 8) consumed 1.5 g/kg available CHO from a low-GI bar (GI = 45) or high-GI bar (GI = 101) two hours before a 90 min simulated soccer match, and 0.38 g/kg body mass during a 15 min half-time break. The test involved alternating 6 min intervals of paced jogging, running, walking, and sprinting, and 3 min intervals of soccer-specific skills (timed ball dribbling, agility running, heading, kicking accuracy). carbohydrate oxidation rate was lower during the match after consuming the low-GI compared to high-GI bar (2.17 ± 0.6 vs. 2.72 ± 0.4 g/min; < 0.05). Participants performed better during the low-GI versus high-GI bar condition on the agility test (5.7 ± 0.4 versus 6.1 ± 0.6 s; < 0.01) and heading (i.e., jumping height 24.7 ± 4.3 versus 22.2 ± 4.5 cm; < 0.01) late in the soccer match (72 min). A low-GI lentil-based sports nutrition bar provides a metabolic benefit (lower carbohydrate oxidation rate) and a modest improvement in agility running and jumping height (heading) late in the test.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Sports Med. 1991 Apr;12(2):180-6 [PMID: 1860741]
  2. Acta Physiol Scand. 1999 Apr;165(4):337-45 [PMID: 10350228]
  3. Sports Med. 2014 May;44 Suppl 1:S25-33 [PMID: 24791914]
  4. Br J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;22(4):141-4 [PMID: 3228681]
  5. Acta Physiol Scand. 1967 Oct-Nov;71(2):129-39 [PMID: 5584522]
  6. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Oct;30(10):2839-44 [PMID: 25474342]
  7. Nutrients. 2017 Apr 01;9(4): [PMID: 28368321]
  8. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):354-60 [PMID: 16895883]
  9. Nutr Rev. 2017 May 1;75(5):327-338 [PMID: 28383695]
  10. Am J Physiol. 1997 Aug;273(2 Pt 1):E268-75 [PMID: 9277379]
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Aug;44(8):1595-603 [PMID: 22330015]
  12. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2010 Dec;20(6):447-56 [PMID: 21116017]
  13. Int J Sports Med. 1999 May;20(4):252-7 [PMID: 10376482]
  14. J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Feb;16(1):152-6 [PMID: 11834122]
  15. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):415-7 [PMID: 11902378]
  16. Can J Sport Sci. 1991 Mar;16(1):23-9 [PMID: 1645211]
  17. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Aug;99(2):707-14 [PMID: 15831796]
  18. Med Sci Sports. 1973 Summer;5(2):90-3 [PMID: 4721012]
  19. J Sports Sci. 2003 Jul;21(7):519-28 [PMID: 12848386]
  20. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2009 Feb;19(1):34-46 [PMID: 19403952]
  21. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009 Sep;4(3):367-80 [PMID: 19953824]
  22. Phys Sportsmed. 1998 Sep;26(9):73-4 [PMID: 20086855]
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Sep;31(9):1280-6 [PMID: 10487369]
  24. J Clin Invest. 1996 Nov 15;98(10):2244-50 [PMID: 8941640]
  25. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 1:S81-90 [PMID: 22916819]
  26. Med Sci Sports. 1973 Fall;5(3):137-46 [PMID: 4270581]
  27. Sports Med. 2017 Jun;47(6):1087-1101 [PMID: 27677914]
  28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Jun;967:217-35 [PMID: 12079850]
  29. J Sports Sci. 2000 Feb;18(2):97-104 [PMID: 10718565]
  30. Br J Nutr. 2003 Dec;90(6):1049-56 [PMID: 14641964]
  31. Int J Sports Med. 1999 Jan;20(1):48-52 [PMID: 10090462]
  32. Sports Med. 2014 Jul;44(7):957-70 [PMID: 24728928]
  33. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Nov;89(5):1845-51 [PMID: 11053335]
  34. Nutrients. 2017 Dec 25;10(1): [PMID: 29295583]
  35. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Oct;16(5):510-27 [PMID: 17240783]
  36. J Hum Kinet. 2019 Mar 27;66:69-79 [PMID: 30988841]
  37. Can J Appl Physiol. 1998 Jun;23(3):271-8 [PMID: 9615869]
  38. Am J Physiol. 1993 Sep;265(3 Pt 1):E380-91 [PMID: 8214047]

Grants

  1. NA/Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. NA/Saskatchewan Pulse Growers

MeSH Term

Adult
Athletic Performance
Blood Glucose
Cross-Over Studies
Dietary Carbohydrates
Double-Blind Method
Glycemic Index
Humans
Male
Recreation
Soccer
Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Dietary Carbohydrates

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00bar±high-GIlow-GIminoxidationmatch64GICHOsoccer=5testrunningagilityheading2<versusexercisecarbohydratecomparedlentil-basedsportsnutritionsimulated1g/kgintervals3Carbohydrateratelower72701jumpingheightlateConsumptionlow-glycemicindexcarbohydratesmaysuperiorincreasingfatdecreasingeffectspre-exercisefeedingmetabolismperformanceUsingrandomizeddouble-blindcounterbalancedcrossoverdesignparticipants8consumedavailable45101twohours9038bodymass15half-timebreakinvolvedalternatingpacedjoggingwalkingsprintingsoccer-specificskillstimedballdribblingkickingaccuracyconsuming17vsg/min05Participantsperformedbetterconditionsie2422cmprovidesmetabolicbenefitmodestimprovementEffectsLow-High-GlycemicIndexSportNutritionBarsMetabolismPerformanceRecreationalSoccerPlayersfatiguehigh-intensity

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)