Dry and moist dynamics shape regional patterns of extreme precipitation sensitivity.

Ji Nie, Panxi Dai, Adam H Sobel
Author Information
  1. Ji Nie: Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; jinie@pku.edu.cn pancy@pku.edu.cn. ORCID
  2. Panxi Dai: Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; jinie@pku.edu.cn pancy@pku.edu.cn.
  3. Adam H Sobel: Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.

Abstract

Responses of extreme precipitation to global warming are of great importance to society and ecosystems. Although observations and climate projections indicate a general intensification of extreme precipitation with warming on global scale, there are significant variations on the regional scale, mainly due to changes in the vertical motion associated with extreme precipitation. Here, we apply quasigeostrophic diagnostics on climate-model simulations to understand the changes in vertical motion, quantifying the roles of dry (large-scale adiabatic flow) and moist (small-scale convection) dynamics in shaping the regional patterns of extreme precipitation sensitivity (EPS). The dry component weakens in the subtropics but strengthens in the middle and high latitudes; the moist component accounts for the positive centers of EPS in the low latitudes and also contributes to the negative centers in the subtropics. A theoretical model depicts a nonlinear relationship between the diabatic heating feedback (α) and precipitable water, indicating high sensitivity of α (thus, EPS) over climatological moist regions. The model also captures the change of α due to competing effects of increases in precipitable water and dry static stability under global warming. Thus, the dry/moist decomposition provides a quantitive and intuitive explanation of the main regional features of EPS.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 9;107(45):19176-80 [PMID: 20974916]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 18;115(38):9467-9472 [PMID: 30181273]
  3. Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 10;8(1):5748 [PMID: 29636537]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 1;106(35):14773-7 [PMID: 19706430]
  5. Nature. 2002 Sep 12;419(6903):224-32 [PMID: 12226677]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0extremeprecipitationregionalmoistEPSglobalwarmingdrysensitivityαclimatescaleduechangesverticalmotionconvectiondynamicspatternscomponentsubtropicshighlatitudescentersalsomodelprecipitablewaterchangeResponsesgreatimportancesocietyecosystemsAlthoughobservationsprojectionsindicategeneralintensificationsignificantvariationsmainlyassociatedapplyquasigeostrophicdiagnosticsclimate-modelsimulationsunderstandquantifyingroleslarge-scaleadiabaticflowsmall-scaleshapingweakensstrengthensmiddleaccountspositivelowcontributesnegativetheoreticaldepictsnonlinearrelationshipdiabaticheatingfeedbackindicatingthusclimatologicalregionscapturescompetingeffectsincreasesstaticstabilityThusdry/moistdecompositionprovidesquantitiveintuitiveexplanationmainfeaturesDryshape

Similar Articles

Cited By