Iron kinetics following treatment with sucroferric oxyhydroxide or ferric citrate in healthy rats and models of anaemia, iron overload or inflammation.

Jürgen Floege, Felix Funk, Markus Ketteler, Anjay Rastogi, Sebastian Walpen, Adrian C Covic, Stuart M Sprague
Author Information
  1. Jürgen Floege: Division of Nephrology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Germany.
  2. Felix Funk: Department of Medical Affairs, Vifor Pharma, Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
  3. Markus Ketteler: Department of General Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany.
  4. Anjay Rastogi: Division of Nephrology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  5. Sebastian Walpen: Department of Medical Affairs, Vifor Pharma, Glattbrugg, Switzerland.
  6. Adrian C Covic: Nephrology Clinic and Dialysis and Transplantation Center, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
  7. Stuart M Sprague: NorthShore University Health System, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Evanston, IL, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The iron-based phosphate binders, sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) and ferric citrate (FC), effectively lower serum phosphorus in clinical studies, but gastrointestinal iron absorption from these agents appears to differ. We compared iron uptake and tissue accumulation during treatment with SFOH or FC using experimental rat models.
METHODS: Iron uptake was evaluated during an 8-h period following oral administration of SFOH, FC, ferrous sulphate (oral iron supplement) or control (methylcellulose vehicle) in rat models of anaemia, iron overload and inflammation. A 13-week study evaluated the effects of SFOH and FC on iron accumulation in different organs.
RESULTS: In the pharmacokinetic experiments, there was a minimal increase in serum iron with SFOH versus control during the 8-h post-treatment period in the iron overload and inflammation rat models, whereas a moderate increase was observed in the anaemia model. Significantly greater increases (P < 0.05) in serum iron were observed with FC versus SFOH in the rat models of anaemia and inflammation. In the 13-week iron accumulation study, total liver iron content was significantly higher in rats receiving FC versus SFOH (P < 0.01), whereas liver iron content did not differ between rats in the SFOH and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Iron uptake was higher from FC versus SFOH following a single dose in anaemia, iron overload and inflammation rat models and 13 weeks of treatment in normal rats. These observations likely relate to different physicochemical properties of SFOH and FC and suggest distinct mechanisms of iron absorption from these two phosphate binders.

Keywords

References

  1. Semin Liver Dis. 2005 Nov;25(4):420-32 [PMID: 16315136]
  2. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Jun;30(6):1037-46 [PMID: 25691681]
  3. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014 Sep 26;7(10):990-8 [PMID: 25341358]
  4. Kidney Int. 1989 Dec;36(6):978-84 [PMID: 2601265]
  5. J Ren Nutr. 2014 Jul;24(4):261-7 [PMID: 24836401]
  6. Cell Metab. 2015 Nov 3;22(5):777-87 [PMID: 26437604]
  7. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Nov;42(5):864-81 [PMID: 14582032]
  8. Gut. 2002 Mar;50(3):413-9 [PMID: 11839724]
  9. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;8(2):280-9 [PMID: 23124782]
  10. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(5):478-87 [PMID: 23147696]
  11. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jan 9;13(1):e1005322 [PMID: 28068331]
  12. J Nephrol. 2015 Feb;28(1):105-13 [PMID: 24840781]
  13. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1330-1338 [PMID: 27342579]
  14. J Biol Chem. 2017 Aug 4;292(31):12735-12743 [PMID: 28615441]
  15. Kidney Int. 2014 Sep;86(3):638-47 [PMID: 24646861]
  16. Liver Cancer. 2014 Mar;3(1):31-40 [PMID: 24804175]
  17. Clin Nephrol. 2010 Jul;74(1):4-11 [PMID: 20557860]
  18. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009 Sep;8(18):1699-708 [PMID: 19571663]
  19. World J Nephrol. 2012 Dec 6;1(6):166-76 [PMID: 24175256]
  20. Curr Drug Metab. 2014;15(10):953-65 [PMID: 25658128]
  21. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Mar;1820(3):403-10 [PMID: 21855608]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1312-24 [PMID: 20375408]
  23. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Feb;26(2):493-503 [PMID: 25060056]
  24. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct;26(10):2578-87 [PMID: 25736045]
  25. Nutrients. 2015 Mar 31;7(4):2274-96 [PMID: 25835049]
  26. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 May;29(5):1053-60 [PMID: 24376274]
  27. Clin Nephrol. 2014 Apr;81(4):251-8 [PMID: 24656315]
  28. Kidney Int Suppl. 2009 Aug;(113):S1-130 [PMID: 19644521]
  29. Physiol Rev. 2013 Oct;93(4):1721-41 [PMID: 24137020]
  30. Inorg Chem. 2013 Nov 4;52(21):12223-33 [PMID: 24102308]

MeSH Term

Administration, Oral
Anemia
Animals
Drug Combinations
Female
Ferric Compounds
Inflammation
Iron
Iron Overload
Kinetics
Male
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Rats, Wistar
Sucrose
Tissue Distribution

Chemicals

Drug Combinations
Ferric Compounds
sucroferric oxyhydroxide
Sucrose
ferric citrate
Iron

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ironSFOHFCmodelsratanaemiainflammationuptakeoverloadversusratsphosphatesucroferricoxyhydroxideferriccitrateserumaccumulationtreatmentIronfollowingcontrolbindersabsorptiondifferevaluated8-hperiodoral13-weekstudydifferentincreasewhereasobservedP < 0livercontenthigherBACKGROUND:iron-basedeffectivelylowerphosphorusclinicalstudiesgastrointestinalagentsappearscomparedtissueusingexperimentalMETHODS:administrationferroussulphatesupplementmethylcellulosevehicleeffectsorgansRESULTS:pharmacokineticexperimentsminimalpost-treatmentmoderatemodelSignificantlygreaterincreases05totalsignificantlyreceiving01groupsCONCLUSIONS:singledose13 weeksnormalobservationslikelyrelatephysicochemicalpropertiessuggestdistinctmechanismstwokineticshealthybinder

Similar Articles

Cited By