Identification of MicroRNAs and Their Targets That Respond to Powdery Mildew Infection in Cucumber by Small RNA and Degradome Sequencing.

Xuewen Xu, Cailian Zhong, Min Tan, Ya Song, Xiaohua Qi, Qiang Xu, Xuehao Chen
Author Information
  1. Xuewen Xu: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  2. Cailian Zhong: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  3. Min Tan: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  4. Ya Song: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  5. Xiaohua Qi: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  6. Qiang Xu: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
  7. Xuehao Chen: School of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Abstract

Powdery mildew (PM) is a prevalent disease known to limit cucumber production worldwide. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded molecules that regulate host defense responses through posttranscriptional gene regulation. However, which specific miRNAs are involved and how they regulate cucumber PM resistance remain elusive. A PM-resistant single-segment substitution line, SSSL508-28, was developed previously using marker-assisted backcrossing of the PM-susceptible cucumber inbred D8 line. In this study, we applied small RNA and degradome sequencing to identify PM-responsive miRNAs and their target genes in the D8 and SSSL508-28 lines. The deep sequencing resulted in the identification of 156 known and 147 novel miRNAs. Among them, 32 and six differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were detected in D8 and SSSL508-28, respectively. The positive correlation between DEMs measured by small RNA sequencing and stem-loop quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed the accuracy of the observed miRNA abundances. The 32 DEMs identified in the PM-susceptible D8 were all upregulated, whereas four of the six DEMs identified in the PM-resistant SSSL508-28 were downregulated. Using and degradome sequencing approaches, 517 and 20 target genes were predicted for the D8 and SSSL508-28 DEMs, respectively. Comparison of the DEM expression profiles with the corresponding mRNA expression profiles obtained in a previous study with the same experimental design identified 60 and three target genes in D8 and SSSL508-28, respectively, which exhibited inverse expression patterns with their respective miRNAs. In particular, five DEMs were located in the substituted segment that contained two upregulated DEMs, Csa-miR172c-3p and Csa-miR395a-3p, in D8 and two downregulated DEMs, Csa-miR395d-3p and Csa-miR398b-3p, in SSSL508-28. One gene encoding L-aspartate oxidase, which was targeted by Csa-miR162a, was also located on the same segment and was specifically downregulated in PM-inoculated D8 leaves. Our results will facilitate the future use of miRNAs in breeding cucumber varieties with enhanced resistance to PM.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 5;18(1):21 [PMID: 28056792]
  2. Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25 [PMID: 19261174]
  3. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15;12 Suppl 1:S41 [PMID: 21342573]
  4. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 26;8:644 [PMID: 28491073]
  5. BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Oct 09;15:243 [PMID: 26453551]
  6. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 Dec;24(12):1427-39 [PMID: 21830949]
  7. BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Jun 24;10:123 [PMID: 20573268]
  8. DNA Res. 2016 Oct 1;23(5):415-425 [PMID: 27374612]
  9. BMC Genomics. 2019 Jul 25;20(1):610 [PMID: 31345162]
  10. Plant Cell. 2011 Nov;23(11):4124-45 [PMID: 22080599]
  11. Curr Biol. 2003 Feb 4;13(3):179-88 [PMID: 12573213]
  12. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Oct;143:183-189 [PMID: 31513952]
  13. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2012 Feb;42(2):133-47 [PMID: 22155036]
  14. Science. 2009 May 22;324(5930):1068-71 [PMID: 19407142]
  15. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006 Oct;9(5):470-7 [PMID: 16890477]
  16. Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 1;25(1):130-1 [PMID: 19017659]
  17. Plant Physiol. 2012 Aug;159(4):1845-56 [PMID: 22730426]
  18. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190175 [PMID: 29320569]
  19. BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):78 [PMID: 30777009]
  20. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550 [PMID: 25516281]
  21. Phytochemistry. 2008 Mar;69(5):1128-34 [PMID: 18226820]
  22. Plant Sci. 2018 Jun;271:133-142 [PMID: 29650151]
  23. Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 31;7:621 [PMID: 27303408]
  24. Genome Biol. 2009;10(9):R96 [PMID: 19754933]
  25. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 16;6:23072 [PMID: 26979661]
  26. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 12;8:565 [PMID: 28446918]
  27. Plant J. 2010 Jun 1;62(6):960-76 [PMID: 20230504]
  28. Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Dec;46(6):6381-6389 [PMID: 31538299]
  29. Plant Cell. 2017 Apr;29(4):618-637 [PMID: 28302675]
  30. Plant Physiol. 2005 Dec;139(4):1890-901 [PMID: 16306146]
  31. BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 2;18(1):572 [PMID: 28768484]
  32. Plant Dis. 2018 Sep 4;:PDIS12171993PDN [PMID: 30192178]
  33. RNA Biol. 2017 Jul 3;14(7):891-904 [PMID: 28430077]
  34. Plant J. 2012 May;70(4):650-65 [PMID: 22268572]
  35. BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):52 [PMID: 29587648]
  36. Plant Cell Rep. 2009 Jun;28(6):985-95 [PMID: 19381642]
  37. Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):290-1 [PMID: 25256573]
  38. Planta. 2009 Mar;229(4):1009-14 [PMID: 19148671]
  39. Elife. 2015 Mar 16;4: [PMID: 25774599]
  40. BMC Genomics. 2019 Jan 10;20(1):33 [PMID: 30630418]
  41. Plant J. 2010 Jan;61(2):249-58 [PMID: 19843314]
  42. Trends Plant Sci. 2004 May;9(5):236-43 [PMID: 15130549]
  43. Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Mar;129(3):507-16 [PMID: 26660669]
  44. New Phytol. 2017 Mar;213(4):1961-1973 [PMID: 27864969]
  45. Plant Direct. 2018 Aug 10;2(8):e00081 [PMID: 31245745]
  46. Mol Genet Genomics. 2013 Apr;288(3-4):77-87 [PMID: 23334784]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0D8DEMsmiRNAsSSSL508-28cucumbersequencingtargetgenesPMRNArespectivelyidentifieddownregulatedexpressionPowderymildewknownMicroRNAsregulategeneresistancePM-resistantlinePM-susceptiblestudysmalldegradome32sixmiRNAupregulatedprofileslocatedsegmenttwoprevalentdiseaselimitproductionworldwidesingle-strandedmoleculeshostdefenseresponsesposttranscriptionalregulationHoweverspecificinvolvedremainelusivesingle-segmentsubstitutiondevelopedpreviouslyusingmarker-assistedbackcrossinginbredappliedidentifyPM-responsivelinesdeepresultedidentification156147novelAmongdifferentiallyexpresseddetectedpositivecorrelationmeasuredstem-loopquantitativereal-timereversetranscription-polymerasechainreactionconfirmedaccuracyobservedabundanceswhereasfourUsingapproaches51720predictedComparisonDEMcorrespondingmRNAobtainedpreviousexperimentaldesign60threeexhibitedinversepatternsrespectiveparticularfivesubstitutedcontainedCsa-miR172c-3pCsa-miR395a-3pCsa-miR395d-3pCsa-miR398b-3pOneencodingL-aspartateoxidasetargetedCsa-miR162aalsospecificallyPM-inoculatedleavesresultswillfacilitatefutureusebreedingvarietiesenhancedIdentificationTargetsRespondMildewInfectionCucumberSmallDegradomeSequencingcomparativeanalysispowdery

Similar Articles

Cited By