Assessing beliefs about emotions: Development and validation of the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire.

Rodrigo Becerra, David A Preece, James J Gross
Author Information
  1. Rodrigo Becerra: School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  2. David A Preece: School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. ORCID
  3. James J Gross: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Abstract

People's beliefs about emotions may be grouped into two main categories: beliefs about the controllability of emotions and beliefs about the usefulness of emotions. These beliefs influence emotion regulation efforts and mental health, so the assessment of these beliefs is important. However, few psychometric measures are available, particularly for assessing the usefulness dimension. In this study (N = 161), we address this issue by developing and conducting an initial validation of a 16-item self-report measure called the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ). Confirmatory factor analyses found its structure to consist of three first-order factors: a controllability factor spanning both negatively and positively valenced emotions (General-Controllability), and two valence-specific usefulness factors (Negative-Usefulness, Positive-Usefulness). All first-order factors also loaded together on a higher-order factor, representing an overall maladaptive beliefs about emotions construct. All subscale and composite scores had good levels of internal consistency. Correlational and regression analyses found that EBQ scores related in expected ways with other measures, and were significant predictors of emotion regulation abilities and psychopathology. We conclude that the beliefs about emotions construct is multidimensional, and the EBQ appears to be a promising new tool to assess it.

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1332-50 [PMID: 21843012]
  2. Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):867-879 [PMID: 29214846]
  3. Emotion. 2012 Aug;12(4):807-16 [PMID: 21728413]
  4. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Mar;68(3):285-92 [PMID: 20159215]
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):731-44 [PMID: 17469955]
  6. Assessment. 2015 Feb;22(1):86-100 [PMID: 24835246]
  7. Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1195-210 [PMID: 23914957]
  8. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43 [PMID: 7726811]
  9. Behav Modif. 2015 May;39(3):431-53 [PMID: 25576185]
  10. Emotion. 2005 Jun;5(2):175-90 [PMID: 15982083]
  11. Cogn Emot. 2013;27(1):3-20 [PMID: 22712535]
  12. J Pers Assess. 2019 Jan-Feb;101(1):73-83 [PMID: 28678548]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Attitude
Emotions
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Parents
Psychometrics
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0beliefsemotionsusefulnessEBQfactortwocontrollabilityemotionregulationmeasuresvalidationEmotionBeliefsQuestionnaireanalysesfoundfirst-orderfactorsconstructscoresPeople'smaygroupedmaincategories:influenceeffortsmentalhealthassessmentimportantHoweverpsychometricavailableparticularlyassessingdimensionstudyN=161addressissuedevelopingconductinginitial16-itemself-reportmeasurecalledConfirmatorystructureconsistthreefactors:spanningnegativelypositivelyvalencedGeneral-Controllabilityvalence-specificNegative-UsefulnessPositive-Usefulnessalsoloadedtogetherhigher-orderrepresentingoverallmaladaptivesubscalecompositegoodlevelsinternalconsistencyCorrelationalregressionrelatedexpectedwayssignificantpredictorsabilitiespsychopathologyconcludemultidimensionalappearspromisingnewtoolassessitAssessingemotions:Development

Similar Articles

Cited By