OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience

More Thoughts than Answers: What Distinguishes Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines from Non-evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines?

Abstract

No abstract text available.

References

1. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Clinical Practice GuidelinesWe Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/ . Accessed February 22, 2020. [DOI: 10.17226/13058]
2. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt G. Evidence vs Consensus in Clinical Practice Guidelines. Jama. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9751 .
3. Cochrane Training. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6, 2019. Available at https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-i . Accessed February 22, 2020.
4. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9, W64. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 . [DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135]
5. AGREE. Advancing the science of practice guidelines. https://www.agreetrust.org/ . Aaccess February 22, 2020.
6. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008 . [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008]
7. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–42. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090449 . [DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090449]

MeSH Term