Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Memory in Korsakoff's Amnesia.

Gabriele Janzen, Claudette J M van Roij, Joukje M Oosterman, Roy P C Kessels
Author Information
  1. Gabriele Janzen: Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  2. Claudette J M van Roij: Centre of Excellence for Neuropsychiatry, Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, Netherlands.
  3. Joukje M Oosterman: Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  4. Roy P C Kessels: Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to investigate spatial memory in a group of patients with amnesia due to Korsakoff's syndrome (KS). We used a virtual spatial memory task that allowed us to separate the use of egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames to determine object locations. Research investigating the ability of patients with Korsakoff's amnesia to use different reference frames is scarce and it remains unclear whether these patients are impaired in using ego- and allocentric reference frames to the same extent. Twenty Korsakoff patients and 24 matched controls watched an animation of a bird flying in one of three trees standing in a virtual environment. After the bird disappeared, the camera turned around, by which the trees were briefly out of sight and then turned back to the center of the environment. Participants were asked in which tree the bird was hiding. In half of the trials, a landmark was shown. Half of the trials required an immediate response whereas in the other half a delay of 10 s was present. Patients performed significantly worse than controls. For all participants trials with a landmark were easier than without a landmark and trials without a delay were easier than with a delay. While controls were above chance on all trials patients were at chance in allocentric trials without a landmark present and with a memory delay. Patients showed no difference in the ego- and the allocentric condition. Together the findings suggest that despite the amnesia, spatial memory and especially the use of ego- and allocentric reference frames in Korsakoff patients are spared.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neuropsychol. 2016 Mar;10(1):90-103 [PMID: 25345967]
  2. Behav Neurosci. 2002 Oct;116(5):851-9 [PMID: 12369805]
  3. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 04;6(4):e18611 [PMID: 21483699]
  4. Biol Psychol. 2009 Dec;82(3):234-45 [PMID: 19683556]
  5. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;69(5):630-5 [PMID: 11032615]
  6. Brain. 2002 Oct;125(Pt 10):2152-90 [PMID: 12244076]
  7. Neuropsychol Rev. 2012 Jun;22(2):132-53 [PMID: 22592661]
  8. Curr Aging Sci. 2009 Mar;2(1):43-59 [PMID: 20021398]
  9. Memory. 1997 Jan-Mar;5(1-2):49-71 [PMID: 9156091]
  10. Front Aging Neurosci. 2012 May 21;4:7 [PMID: 22661944]
  11. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 11;9:196 [PMID: 26029074]
  12. Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):473-6 [PMID: 15291725]
  13. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):155-65 [PMID: 19066199]
  14. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2618 [PMID: 30619013]
  15. Brain Cogn. 2004 Feb;54(1):24-34 [PMID: 14733897]
  16. Cortex. 1999 Sep;35(4):479-501 [PMID: 10574076]
  17. Cortex. 2000 Feb;36(1):47-57 [PMID: 10728896]
  18. Front Aging Neurosci. 2012 Nov 01;4:29 [PMID: 23125833]
  19. Curr Biol. 2018 Sep 10;28(17):2861-2866.e4 [PMID: 30100340]
  20. Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 02;4:904 [PMID: 24368903]
  21. Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jul;236(7):1861-1868 [PMID: 29680910]
  22. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):867-82 [PMID: 16822154]
  23. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1517-35 [PMID: 15601516]
  24. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020 Jan-Mar;9(1):31-40 [PMID: 30375882]
  25. Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):337-41 [PMID: 12137136]
  26. Eur J Neurosci. 1997 May;9(5):941-55 [PMID: 9182947]
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Dec;10(12):551-7 [PMID: 17071127]
  28. Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):921-4 [PMID: 9572740]
  29. J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 3;33(14):6012-7 [PMID: 23554482]
  30. Cognition. 1999 Mar 1;70(2):191-210 [PMID: 10349763]
  31. Neuron. 2017 Aug 30;95(5):1019-1035 [PMID: 28858613]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 6;104(10):4042-7 [PMID: 17360474]
  33. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 23;196(2):187-91 [PMID: 18817815]
  34. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Aug;27(6):645-55 [PMID: 16019641]
  35. Neuropsychol Rev. 2012 Jun;22(2):117-31 [PMID: 22580849]
  36. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1603-8 [PMID: 22484079]
  37. Neuroimage. 2010 Aug 1;52(1):364-70 [PMID: 20381625]
  38. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 May;12(3):327-36 [PMID: 16903125]
  39. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 23;369(1635):20120533 [PMID: 24366141]
  40. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):142-57 [PMID: 14736303]
  41. Neurology. 1993 Sep;43(9):1683-9 [PMID: 8414012]
  42. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Aug;49(10):2848-55 [PMID: 21704050]
  43. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 Jun;29(5):612-7 [PMID: 15041084]
  44. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Nov 27;13:2875-2890 [PMID: 29225466]
  45. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 10;8:803 [PMID: 25346679]
  46. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(4):410-25 [PMID: 10683392]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsallocentrictrialsspatialmemorydelayamnesiareferenceframeslandmarkpresentKorsakoff'suseego-controlsbirdwithoutsyndromevirtualegocentricKorsakofftreesenvironmentturnedhalfPatientseasierchancegoalstudyinvestigategroupdueKSusedtaskallowedusseparatedetermineobjectlocationsResearchinvestigatingabilitydifferentscarceremainsunclearwhetherimpairedusingextentTwenty24matchedwatchedanimationflyingonethreestandingdisappearedcameraaroundbrieflysightbackcenterParticipantsaskedtreehidingshownHalfrequiredimmediateresponsewhereas10sperformedsignificantlyworseparticipantsshoweddifferenceconditionTogetherfindingssuggestdespiteespeciallysparedEgocentricAllocentricSpatialMemoryAmnesiaKorsakoff’slandmarks

Similar Articles

Cited By