Pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) release their trapped and distressed owners: Individual variation and evidence of emotional contagion.

Joshua Van Bourg, Jordan Elizabeth Patterson, Clive D L Wynne
Author Information
  1. Joshua Van Bourg: Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America. ORCID
  2. Jordan Elizabeth Patterson: Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
  3. Clive D L Wynne: Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.

Abstract

Domestic dogs have assisted humans for millennia. However, the extent to which these helpful behaviors are prosocially motivated remains unclear. To assess the propensity of pet dogs to actively rescue distressed humans without explicit training, this study tested whether sixty pet dogs would release their seemingly trapped owners from a large box. To examine the causal mechanisms that shaped this behavior, the readiness of each dog to open the box was tested in three conditions: 1) the owner sat in the box and called for help (distress test), 2) an experimenter placed high-value food rewards in the box (food test), and 3) the owner sat in the box and calmly read aloud (reading test). Dogs were as likely to release their distressed owner as to retrieve treats from inside the box, indicating that rescuing an owner may be a highly rewarding action for dogs. After accounting for opening ability, dogs released the owner more often when the owner called for help than when the owner read aloud calmly. In addition, opening latencies decreased with test number in the distress test but not the reading test. Thus, rescuing the owner could not be attributed solely to social facilitation, stimulus enhancement, or social contact-seeking behavior. Dogs displayed more stress behaviors in the distress test than in the reading test, and stress scores decreased with test number in the reading test but not in the distress test. This evidence of emotional contagion supports the hypothesis that rescuing the distressed owner was an empathetically-motivated prosocial behavior. Success in the food task and previous (in-home) experience opening objects were both strong predictors of releasing the owner. Thus, prosocial behavior tests for dogs should control for physical ability and previous experience.

References

  1. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279-300 [PMID: 17550343]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19762-6 [PMID: 18077409]
  3. Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):289-302 [PMID: 21643852]
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150077 [PMID: 26644596]
  5. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 16;5:18102 [PMID: 26669671]
  6. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):e0223039 [PMID: 31574116]
  7. Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63 [PMID: 18481363]
  8. Behav Processes. 2009 Oct;82(2):109-18 [PMID: 19686949]
  9. J Comp Psychol. 2006 May;120(2):113-9 [PMID: 16719589]
  10. Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):374-386 [PMID: 30039272]
  11. Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):689-700 [PMID: 24146217]
  12. Anim Cogn. 2016 Jul;19(4):679-705 [PMID: 27000780]
  13. Evol Psychol. 2013 Jul 18;11(3):647-64 [PMID: 23864298]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):721-4 [PMID: 22526686]
  15. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6573 [PMID: 19672292]
  16. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 07;8(8):e71365 [PMID: 23951146]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 May;101(3):385-405 [PMID: 24643871]
  18. Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):609-18 [PMID: 24126919]
  19. Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 04;7:1416 [PMID: 27757085]
  20. Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1427-30 [PMID: 22158823]
  21. Anim Cogn. 2020 Mar;23(2):389-403 [PMID: 31907679]
  22. Neuroreport. 2007 Mar 26;18(5):467-71 [PMID: 17496805]
  23. Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 23;8(6):910-2 [PMID: 22859561]
  24. Anim Cogn. 2012 Sep;15(5):851-9 [PMID: 22644113]
  25. Trends Neurosci. 2013 Aug;36(8):489-96 [PMID: 23746460]
  26. Addict Biol. 2019 Jul;24(4):676-684 [PMID: 29726093]
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):397-402 [PMID: 19716750]
  28. Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 11;16(13):R482-3 [PMID: 16824903]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Mar;89(2):247-61 [PMID: 18422021]
  30. J Pers. 1987 Mar;55(1):19-39 [PMID: 3572705]
  31. Nat Neurosci. 2016 Oct 26;19(11):1387-1389 [PMID: 27786183]
  32. Biol Lett. 2016 Jan;12(1):20150883 [PMID: 26763220]
  33. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Apr;52(4):749-58 [PMID: 3572736]
  34. J Comp Psychol. 2003 Sep;117(3):257-63 [PMID: 14498801]
  35. Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 08;7:850 [PMID: 27375528]
  36. Sci Adv. 2017 Jul 19;3(7):e1700398 [PMID: 28776031]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior Rating Scale
Behavior, Animal
Dogs
Emotions
Empathy
Food
Human-Animal Bond
Humans
Motivation
Psychological Distress
Regression Analysis
Reward

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0testownerdogsboxdistressedbehaviordistressreadingreleasefoodrescuingopeninghumansbehaviorspettestedtrappedsatcalledhelpcalmlyreadaloudDogsabilitydecreasednumberThussocialstressevidenceemotionalcontagionprosocialpreviousexperienceDomesticassistedmillenniaHoweverextenthelpfulprosociallymotivatedremainsunclearassesspropensityactivelyrescuewithoutexplicittrainingstudywhethersixtyseeminglyownerslargeexaminecausalmechanismsshapedreadinessdogopenthreeconditions:12experimenterplacedhigh-valuerewards3likelyretrievetreatsinsideindicatingmayhighlyrewardingactionaccountingreleasedoftenadditionlatenciesattributedsolelyfacilitationstimulusenhancementcontact-seekingdisplayedscoressupportshypothesisempathetically-motivatedSuccesstaskin-homeobjectsstrongpredictorsreleasingtestscontrolphysicalPetCanislupusfamiliarisowners:Individualvariation

Similar Articles

Cited By