Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects.

S Craig Roberts, Jan Havlíček, Benoist Schaal
Author Information
  1. S Craig Roberts: Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
  2. Jan Havlíček: Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 42 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  3. Benoist Schaal: Developmental Ethology and Cognitive Psychology Laboratory, Centre for Taste, Smell and Feeding Behaviour Science, UMR 6265 CNRS-Université de Bourgogne-Inra-AgroSup, Dijon, France.

Abstract

Although anthropologists frequently report the centrality of odours in the daily lives and cultural beliefs of many small-scale communities, Western scholars have historically considered the sense of smell as minimally involved in Human communication. Here, we suggest that the origin and persistence of this latter view might be a consequence of the fact that most research is conducted on participants from Western societies who, collectively, were rather (adults), and (ODD) to various aspects of olfactory perception. The view is rapidly changing, however, and this themed issue provides a timely overview of the current state-of-the-art on Human chemocommunication. Based on evolutionary models of communication, the papers cover both general mechanisms of odour production by 'senders' and odour perception by 'receivers'. Focus on specific functional contexts includes reciprocal impact of odours between infants and mothers, the role of odour in mate choice and how odours communicate emotion and disease. Finally, a position paper outlines pitfalls and opportunities for the future, against the context of the replication crisis in psychology. We believe a more nuanced view of Human chemical communication is within our grasp if we can continue to develop inter-disciplinary insights and expand research activities beyond ODD people. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Olfactory communication in humans'.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 15;506-507:196-200 [PMID: 25460952]
  2. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135 [PMID: 20550733]
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 7;282(1804):20142994 [PMID: 25740891]
  4. Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):409-413.e2 [PMID: 29358070]
  5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190263 [PMID: 32306882]
  6. Rhinology. 2017 Mar 1;55(1):17-26 [PMID: 28040824]
  7. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190274 [PMID: 32306881]
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190261 [PMID: 32306879]
  9. Z Tierpsychol. 1977 Mar;43(3):225-38 [PMID: 868320]
  10. J Anat Physiol. 1890 Oct;25(Pt 1):105-53 [PMID: 17231891]
  11. Toxicol Sci. 1998 Dec;46(2):352-64 [PMID: 10048139]
  12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190372 [PMID: 32306875]
  13. Psychosom Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;53(6):693-700 [PMID: 1758952]
  14. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190262 [PMID: 32306877]
  15. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1980;20(3B):843-58 [PMID: 7349450]
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190272 [PMID: 32306878]
  17. Rhinology. 2019 Oct 1;57(5):322-330 [PMID: 31152646]
  18. Pediatrics. 2001 Jun;107(6):E88 [PMID: 11389286]
  19. Chem Senses. 2000 Dec;25(6):729-37 [PMID: 11114151]
  20. Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 30;10:859 [PMID: 31114519]
  21. Science. 2017 May 12;356(6338): [PMID: 28495701]
  22. PLoS Biol. 2004 May;2(5):E146 [PMID: 15138509]
  23. Chem Senses. 2004 Jan;29(1):41-51 [PMID: 14752039]
  24. PLoS One. 2016 May 03;11(5):e0154392 [PMID: 27138751]
  25. J Chem Ecol. 2018 May;44(5):431-435 [PMID: 29611073]
  26. Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jan;10(1):27-9 [PMID: 17173046]
  27. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23(3):439-49 [PMID: 9989430]
  28. Nat Commun. 2011 Dec 13;2:588 [PMID: 22158443]
  29. Mol Ecol. 2014 Nov;23(21):5151-63 [PMID: 25251264]
  30. Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:45-54 [PMID: 30630079]
  31. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190270 [PMID: 32306885]
  32. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190260 [PMID: 32306884]
  33. Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 05;4:597 [PMID: 24046759]
  34. PLoS One. 2008 Jul 09;3(7):e2640 [PMID: 18612420]
  35. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190273 [PMID: 32306876]
  36. Science. 2019 Apr 12;364(6436):112 [PMID: 30975867]
  37. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69203 [PMID: 23922693]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3324-7 [PMID: 12612342]
  39. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Sep;118(9):1251-6 [PMID: 20478761]
  40. Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):266-70 [PMID: 24355816]
  41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 14;97(6):2870-4 [PMID: 10706615]
  42. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190266 [PMID: 32306871]
  43. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190265 [PMID: 32306872]
  44. Nature. 2003 Jul 3;424(6944):68-72 [PMID: 12840760]
  45. Yale J Biol Med. 2018 Mar 28;91(1):53-62 [PMID: 29599658]
  46. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190264 [PMID: 32306880]
  47. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2014 Nov;297(11):2196-204 [PMID: 25312373]
  48. Chem Senses. 2006 Jan;31(1):79-85 [PMID: 16354742]
  49. Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 07;6:1115 [PMID: 26300812]
  50. Perception. 2017 Mar-Apr;46(3-4):484-497 [PMID: 28056656]
  51. Toxicol Pathol. 2008 Feb;36(2):289-310 [PMID: 18349428]
  52. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190259 [PMID: 32306868]
  53. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190268 [PMID: 32306873]
  54. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190267 [PMID: 32306874]
  55. Elife. 2015 Mar 03;4: [PMID: 25732039]
  56. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190271 [PMID: 32306883]
  57. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190269 [PMID: 32306870]
  58. Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):316-21 [PMID: 17108956]

MeSH Term

Humans
Nonverbal Communication
Odorants
Olfactory Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0communicationodourshumanviewperceptionodourWesternsmellresearchODDolfactoryissuecurrentfuturechemicalAlthoughanthropologistsfrequentlyreportcentralitydailylivesculturalbeliefsmanysmall-scalecommunitiesscholarshistoricallyconsideredsenseminimallyinvolvedsuggestoriginpersistencelattermightconsequencefactconductedparticipantssocietiescollectivelyratheradultsvariousaspectsrapidlychanginghoweverthemedprovidestimelyoverviewstate-of-the-artchemocommunicationBasedevolutionarymodelspaperscovergeneralmechanismsproduction'senders''receivers'FocusspecificfunctionalcontextsincludesreciprocalimpactinfantsmothersrolematechoicecommunicateemotiondiseaseFinallypositionpaperoutlinespitfallsopportunitiescontextreplicationcrisispsychologybelievenuancedwithingraspcancontinuedevelopinter-disciplinaryinsightsexpandactivitiesbeyondpeoplearticlepartTheoMurphymeeting'Olfactoryhumans'Humancommunication:challengesprospectsWEIRDpheromonesemiochemistry

Similar Articles

Cited By (13)