A study protocol for a clustered randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-led school-based walking intervention on adolescent girls' physical activity: the Walking In ScHools (WISH) study.

S Maria O'Kane, Angela Carlin, Alison M Gallagher, Ian M Lahart, Russell Jago, Maria Faulkner, Marie H Murphy
Author Information
  1. S Maria O'Kane: Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research Institute, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK. m.okane@ulster.ac.uk.
  2. Angela Carlin: Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research Institute, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK.
  3. Alison M Gallagher: Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, University of Ulster, Coleraine Campus, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
  4. Ian M Lahart: Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall Campus, Gorway Road, Walsall, WS1 3BD, UK.
  5. Russell Jago: Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
  6. Maria Faulkner: Department of Law and Humanities, Letterkenny Institute of Technology, Port Road, Letterkenny, Ireland.
  7. Marie H Murphy: Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research Institute, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls in the UK and Ireland are failing to meet current physical activity guidelines. Physical activity behaviours track from childhood to adulthood and it is important that adolescent girls are provided with opportunities to be physically active. Walking has been a central focus for physical activity promotion in adults and may effectively increase physical activity levels among younger people. Following on from a pilot feasibility trial, the purpose of this cluster randomised controlled trial (c-RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, low-cost, peer-led school-based walking intervention delivered across the school year at increasing physical activity levels of adolescent girls.
METHODS: The Walking In ScHools (WISH) Study is a school-based c-RCT conducted with girls aged 12-14 years from eighteen schools across the Border Region of Ireland / Northern Ireland. Following baseline data collection, schools will be randomly allocated to intervention or control group. In intervention schools, female pupils aged 15-18 years will be invited to train as walk leaders and will lead younger pupils in 10-15 min walks before school, at break and lunch recess. All walks will take place in school grounds and pupils will be encouraged to participate in as many walks as possible each week. The intervention will be delivered for the whole school year (minimum 20-22 weeks). The primary outcome measure is accelerometer-measured total physical activity (counts per minute) (end of intervention). Secondary outcomes will include time spent in sedentary behaviour, light, moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity, anthropometry measures, social media usage and sleep. A mixed-methods process evaluation will also be undertaken.
DISCUSSION: The WISH Study will examine the effectiveness of a low-cost, school-based, peer-led walking intervention in increasing physical activity in adolescent girls when delivered across the school year. If the intervention increases physical activity, it would benefit adolescent girls in the defined target area with potential for wider adoption by schools across the UK and Ireland.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN; ISRCTN12847782; Registered 2nd July 2019.

Keywords

References

  1. J Adolesc Health. 2019 Oct;65(4):446-454 [PMID: 31248803]
  2. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):247-57 [PMID: 22818937]
  3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 17;12:113 [PMID: 26377803]
  4. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jan;37(1):153-6 [PMID: 11153730]
  5. EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jan 04;6:59-68 [PMID: 31193561]
  6. Sports Med. 2016 Apr;46(4):515-30 [PMID: 26626069]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 23;19(1):980 [PMID: 31337374]
  8. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):110-7 [PMID: 11457630]
  9. Health Educ Behav. 2008 Apr;35(2):158-73 [PMID: 16923837]
  10. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 19;12:55 [PMID: 22260195]
  11. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213 [PMID: 2748771]
  12. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2005 Jun;5(3):353-64 [PMID: 19807604]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2019 May 28;19(1):644 [PMID: 31138171]
  14. J Adolesc. 2016 Aug;51:41-9 [PMID: 27294324]
  15. Health Educ Res. 2005 Feb;20(1):14-23 [PMID: 15253994]
  16. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40 [PMID: 20459784]
  17. Can J Public Health. 2007 Mar-Apr;98(2):97-100 [PMID: 17441530]
  18. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655 [PMID: 18824488]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 21;15:1270 [PMID: 26689932]
  20. BMC Med. 2010 Mar 24;8:18 [PMID: 20334633]
  21. Sports Med. 2001 Feb;31(2):91-100 [PMID: 11227981]
  22. Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):409-17 [PMID: 22023559]
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S531-43 [PMID: 16294116]
  24. J Pediatr. 2005 Jun;146(6):732-7 [PMID: 15973308]
  25. BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3 [PMID: 10797032]
  26. J Phys Act Health. 2013 Aug;10(6):910-26 [PMID: 23074100]
  27. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Oct;47(10):2084-92 [PMID: 25706294]
  28. BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258 [PMID: 25791983]
  29. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD007651 [PMID: 19160341]
  30. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):636-42 [PMID: 23159259]
  31. BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 18;18(1):1383 [PMID: 30563488]
  32. J Sch Health. 2019 Sep;89(9):730-738 [PMID: 31257606]
  33. Arch Dis Child. 1995 Jul;73(1):25-9 [PMID: 7639544]
  34. Health Educ Res. 2006 Dec;21(6):826-35 [PMID: 16857780]
  35. Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Sep;27(Pt 3):743-60 [PMID: 19994579]
  36. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:738705 [PMID: 24073416]
  37. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 May 21;4:19 [PMID: 17517136]
  38. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(11):886-95 [PMID: 21807669]
  39. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50 [PMID: 18322790]
  40. Trials. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):31 [PMID: 29325578]
  41. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Mar 01;13:32 [PMID: 26931142]
  42. Circulation. 2013 Nov 12;128(20):2259-79 [PMID: 24126387]
  43. Sports Med. 1997 May;23(5):306-32 [PMID: 9181668]
  44. Obes Facts. 2009;2(3):187-95 [PMID: 20054224]
  45. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 [PMID: 11392867]
  46. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e011055 [PMID: 27797982]
  47. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Nov;13(11 Suppl 2):S183-S188 [PMID: 27848751]
  48. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65 [PMID: 18949660]
  49. Sports Med. 2006;36(4):359-71 [PMID: 16573359]
  50. J Phys Act Health. 2012 May;9(4):492-9 [PMID: 21945980]
  51. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jun;52(12):800-806 [PMID: 29858467]
  52. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 May 13;11:62 [PMID: 24885978]
  53. Children (Basel). 2019 Mar 23;6(3): [PMID: 30909547]
  54. J Sports Sci. 2004 Aug;22(8):679-701 [PMID: 15370482]
  55. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Mar;12(2):284-92 [PMID: 18328781]
  56. BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 24;13:1003 [PMID: 24152257]
  57. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Mar;37(3):478-87 [PMID: 15741848]
  58. Sports Med. 2013 Apr;43(4):287-99 [PMID: 23512170]
  59. J Adolesc Health. 1998 May;22(5):394-402 [PMID: 9589341]
  60. Prev Med. 2015 Mar;72:34-43 [PMID: 25579505]
  61. J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Mar 01;11(1):39-50 [PMID: 24149121]
  62. Prev Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):140-4 [PMID: 22197800]
  63. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Feb 26;31 Suppl 3:219-26 [PMID: 25719789]

Grants

  1. CHI/5427/2018/INTERREG CHITIN Award

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Child
Exercise
Female
Health Promotion
Humans
Northern Ireland
Peer Group
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design
School Health Services
Schools
United Kingdom
Walking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0activityphysicalwillinterventiongirlsadolescentschoolIrelandWalkingschool-basedacrossschoolstrialeffectivenesspeer-ledwalkingdeliveredyearWISHpupilswalksAdolescentUKPhysicallevelsyoungerFollowingrandomisedcontrolledc-RCTevaluatelow-costincreasingScHoolsStudyagedstudyBACKGROUND:failingmeetcurrentguidelinesbehaviourstrackchildhoodadulthoodimportantprovidedopportunitiesphysicallyactivecentralfocuspromotionadultsmayeffectivelyincreaseamongpeoplepilotfeasibilitypurposeclusternovelMETHODS:conducted12-14 yearseighteenBorderRegion/Northernbaselinedatacollectionrandomlyallocatedcontrolgroupfemale15-18 yearsinvitedtrainwalkleaderslead10-15 minbreaklunchrecesstakeplacegroundsencouragedparticipatemanypossibleweekwholeminimum20-22 weeksprimaryoutcomemeasureaccelerometer-measuredtotalcountsperminuteendSecondaryoutcomesincludetimespentsedentarybehaviourlightmoderatevigorousintensityanthropometrymeasuressocialmediausagesleepmixed-methodsprocessevaluationalsoundertakenDISCUSSION:examineincreasesbenefitdefinedtargetareapotentialwideradoptionTRIALREGISTRATION:ISRCTNISRCTN12847782Registered2ndJuly2019protocolclusteredgirls'activity:InterventionSchools

Similar Articles

Cited By