Evaluation of Criminal Sanctions Concerning Violations of Cattle and Pig Welfare.

Sofia Väärikkälä, Tarja Koskela, Laura Hänninen, Mari Nevas
Author Information
  1. Sofia Väärikkälä: Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66 (Agnes Sjöbergin katu 2), 00014 Helsingin Yliopisto, Finland.
  2. Tarja Koskela: Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111 (Yliopistokatu 2), 80101 Joensuu, Finland.
  3. Laura Hänninen: Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, 00014 Helsingin Yliopisto, Finland.
  4. Mari Nevas: Department of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66 (Agnes Sjöbergin katu 2), 00014 Helsingin Yliopisto, Finland.

Abstract

EU legislation requires the violations of animal welfare standards to be sanctioned. Our aim was to evaluate criminal sanctions concerning violations of Cattle and Pig welfare on Finnish farms. We analyzed 196 court cases heard in Finnish district courts from 2011 to 2016. Almost all the cases (95%) concerned the violations of Cattle welfare, of which 61% occurred on small farms. The lack of cleanliness and inadequate feeding and watering were the most common reported violations. Median time span from the start date of an offending to a judgement was slightly less than two years. Of the cases, 96% resulted in conviction. The court did not perceive the violations as being highly blameworthy as a small fine and a short conditional imprisonment were the most often imposed sanctions. A ban on the keeping of animals was used as a precautionary measure in half of the cases. Veterinarians were shown to have an important role in the initiation of criminal procedures, providing evidence for the police, and acting as witnesses. Therefore, it is crucial to achieve a well-functioning collaboration between veterinarians and the police and prosecutors. The expertise of these authorities on animal welfare legislation should also be emphasized to improve the efficacy of criminal procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Animals (Basel). 2018 Dec 08;8(12): [PMID: 30544781]
  2. Vet Pathol. 2016 Sep;53(5):880-7 [PMID: 27030370]
  3. Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 19;7:77 [PMID: 32140473]
  4. Animals (Basel). 2018 May 08;8(5): [PMID: 29738491]
  5. Rev Sci Tech. 2013 Dec;32(3):657-68 [PMID: 24761722]
  6. Vet Rec. 2016 Oct 22;179(16):412-413 [PMID: 27770094]
  7. Animals (Basel). 2019 May 22;9(5): [PMID: 31121864]
  8. Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 25;8(7): [PMID: 29941781]
  9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 08;4:25 [PMID: 15533249]
  10. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4(2):75-82 [PMID: 19291476]

Grants

  1. 18/Eläinlääketieteen Tutkimuksen Tukisäätiö

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0welfareviolationscriminalcasesanimalcattlelegislationsanctionspigFinnishfarmscourtsmallprocedurespoliceEUrequiresstandardssanctionedaimevaluateconcerninganalyzed196hearddistrictcourts20112016Almost95%concerned61%occurredlackcleanlinessinadequatefeedingwateringcommonreportedMediantimespanstartdateoffendingjudgementslightlylesstwoyears96%resultedconvictionperceivehighlyblameworthyfineshortconditionalimprisonmentoftenimposedbankeepinganimalsusedprecautionarymeasurehalfVeterinariansshownimportantroleinitiationprovidingevidenceactingwitnessesThereforecrucialachievewell-functioningcollaborationveterinariansprosecutorsexpertiseauthoritiesalsoemphasizedimproveefficacyEvaluationCriminalSanctionsConcerningViolationsCattlePigWelfarecrimesanction

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)