Potential Pathogenic Bacteria in Seminal Microbiota of Patients with Different Types of Dysspermatism.

Huijun Yang, Jiaming Zhang, Zhiwei Xue, Changying Zhao, Lijun Lei, Yan Wen, Yunling Dong, Junjie Yang, Lei Zhang
Author Information
  1. Huijun Yang: Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, 250000, China.
  2. Jiaming Zhang: College of Life Science, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, 250200, China.
  3. Zhiwei Xue: Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, 250000, China.
  4. Changying Zhao: Shandong Children's Microbiome Center, Qilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250022, China.
  5. Lijun Lei: Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, 250000, China.
  6. Yan Wen: Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, 250000, China.
  7. Yunling Dong: Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, 250000, China.
  8. Junjie Yang: College of Life Science, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, 250200, China. microbiota@foxmail.com.
  9. Lei Zhang: Shandong Institute of Industrial Technology for Health Sciences and Precision Medicine, Jinan, 250100, China. microbiome@foxmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

Human microbiota play an important role in the health of their human hosts. Recent studies have demonstrated that microbiota exist in seminal plasma. The current study aims to elucidate whether seminal microbiota exist in patients with different types of dysspermatism and whether bacterial biomarkers can be identified for them. A total of 159 study participants were recruited, including 22 patients with oligoasthenospermia, 58 patients with asthenospermia, 8 patients with azoospermia, 13 patients with oligospermia, and 58 matched healthy controls. Seminal microbiota composition was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing. The results showed that the composition of seminal microbiota of patients with dysspermatism differed from those of healthy controls. Comparison of the microbiota composition in semen samples from patients with different types of dysspermatism showed that microbiota in patients with asthenospermia and oligoasthenospermia were distinct from healthy controls in beta diversity (P < 0.05). Characteristic biomarkers, including Ureaplasma, Bacteroides, Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Lactobacillus and Acinetobacter lwoffii, were identified based on LEfSe analysis. Inferred functional analysis based on seminal microbiome data further indicated the presence of potential pathogenic biomarkers in patients with asthenospermia and oligoasthenospermia. These results provided profiles of seminal microbiota exhibited in different types of dysspermatism, thus providing new insights into their pathogenesis.

References

  1. Fertil Steril. 2014 Sep;102(3):711-719.e1 [PMID: 25044081]
  2. Int J Androl. 2011 Oct;34(5 Pt 2):e330-47 [PMID: 21696400]
  3. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110152 [PMID: 25340531]
  4. Iran J Microbiol. 2018 Apr;10(2):111-116 [PMID: 29997751]
  5. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Nov;59(11):1034-1040 [PMID: 28692609]
  6. Res Microbiol. 2015 Jun;166(5):440-447 [PMID: 25869222]
  7. Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 12;10:234 [PMID: 30809218]
  8. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018 Jun;79(6):e12838 [PMID: 29500854]
  9. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jul;16(7):435-442 [PMID: 30234183]
  10. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Apr;32(4):509-20 [PMID: 25646893]
  11. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010 Oct;16(10):867-71 [PMID: 21243747]
  12. Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Aug;69(4):390-401 [PMID: 28398021]
  13. Urology. 2017 Feb;100:97-102 [PMID: 27871827]
  14. Eur Urol. 2005 Nov;48(5):703-11 [PMID: 16005562]
  15. Hum Reprod. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1212-1217 [PMID: 29850857]
  16. Science. 2015 Nov 13;350(6262):830-4 [PMID: 26564856]
  17. Endocrine. 2017 May;56(2):416-425 [PMID: 27465288]
  18. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2018 Jun;45(2):57-66 [PMID: 29984205]
  19. Nat Rev Urol. 2019 Dec;16(12):703-721 [PMID: 31732723]
  20. Andrologia. 2017 Sep;49(7): [PMID: 27921326]
  21. BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jan 15;11(1):24 [PMID: 29335009]
  22. J Immunol. 2006 Nov 15;177(10):7155-63 [PMID: 17082633]
  23. Reprod Toxicol. 2003 Jul-Aug;17(4):447-50 [PMID: 12849856]
  24. Microb Pathog. 2014 Apr-May;69-70:33-8 [PMID: 24685696]
  25. Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):625-631 [PMID: 28434677]
  26. Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1 [PMID: 20709691]
  27. Basic Clin Androl. 2018 Jun 4;28:6 [PMID: 29881623]
  28. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 14;6:23027 [PMID: 26971397]
  29. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 May;58:1-8 [PMID: 29525681]
  30. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Sep;35(9):1691-1701 [PMID: 29931406]
  31. Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63 [PMID: 21903629]
  32. PLoS Genet. 2008 Mar 28;4(3):e1000042 [PMID: 18369460]
  33. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Apr 1;104(4):1259-1271 [PMID: 30403786]
  34. J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;64(1):49-54 [PMID: 30310178]
  35. Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):55-60 [PMID: 23023125]
  36. Trends Microbiol. 2018 Jan;26(1):16-32 [PMID: 28844447]
  37. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017 Aug;29(8):1602-1612 [PMID: 27569192]
  38. J Reprod Immunol. 2013 Nov;100(1):76-85 [PMID: 24344359]
  39. Arch Androl. 1995 Jul-Aug;35(1):43-7 [PMID: 8554430]
  40. Infection. 2018 Feb;46(1):31-38 [PMID: 29124647]
  41. Turk J Urol. 2018 Sep;44(5):389-392 [PMID: 29799410]
  42. Clin Biochem. 2018 Dec;62:39-46 [PMID: 29555320]
  43. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 Apr;109:404-408 [PMID: 28216014]
  44. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019 Jul;190(1):45-51 [PMID: 30293130]
  45. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135818 [PMID: 26275143]
  46. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D141-5 [PMID: 19004872]
  47. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jul;16(7):469-474 [PMID: 30234189]
  48. Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6 [PMID: 20383131]
  49. Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1261-9 [PMID: 23993888]
  50. Fertil Steril. 2007 Oct;88(4 Suppl):1076-85 [PMID: 17383646]

MeSH Term

Adult
Asthenozoospermia
Bacteria
Biodiversity
Biomarkers
Case-Control Studies
Discriminant Analysis
Humans
Infertility, Male
Male
Metagenome
Microbiota
Oligospermia
Phylogeny
Principal Component Analysis
Semen

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsmicrobiotaseminaldysspermatismdifferenttypesbiomarkersoligoasthenospermiaasthenospermiahealthycontrolscompositionexiststudywhetheridentifiedincluding58SeminalresultsshowedbasedanalysisHumanplayimportantrolehealthhumanhostsRecentstudiesdemonstratedplasmacurrentaimselucidatebacterialcantotal159participantsrecruited228azoospermia13oligospermiamatchedanalyzedusing16SrRNAgene-basedsequencingdifferedComparisonsemensamplesdistinctbetadiversityP < 005CharacteristicUreaplasmaBacteroidesAnaerococcusFinegoldiaLactobacillusAcinetobacterlwoffiiLEfSeInferredfunctionalmicrobiomedataindicatedpresencepotentialpathogenicprovidedprofilesexhibitedthusprovidingnewinsightspathogenesisPotentialPathogenicBacteriaMicrobiotaPatientsDifferentTypesDysspermatism

Similar Articles

Cited By