Number of consulting medical institutions and risk of polypharmacy in community-dwelling older people under a healthcare system with free access: a cross-sectional study in Japan.

Toshiki Suzuki, Masao Iwagami, Shota Hamada, Tomoyuki Matsuda, Nanako Tamiya
Author Information
  1. Toshiki Suzuki: School of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
  2. Masao Iwagami: Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. iwagami-tky@umin.ac.jp.
  3. Shota Hamada: Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
  4. Tomoyuki Matsuda: Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
  5. Nanako Tamiya: Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tenno-dai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Under the Japanese free access healthcare system, patients are allowed to consult multiple medical institutions (including clinics and hospitals for general or specialist consultation) without primary care referral. This potentially increases the risk of polypharmacy. We examined the association between the number of consulting medical institutions and polypharmacy under a healthcare system with free access.
METHODS: Via a self-administered questionnaire, we identified people aged ≥65 years with ≥1 disease and  ≥1 consulting medical institution in a Japanese city in 2016. The exposure of interest was the number of consulting medical institutions (1, 2, or ≥3) and the outcome was polypharmacy (use of ≥6 types of drugs). We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, household economy, and the number and type of comorbidities. To minimize confounding effects, we also performed propensity-score-matched analysis, categorizing patients into two groups: 1 and  ≥2 consulting medical institutions.
RESULTS: Of 993 eligible individuals (mean (standard deviation) age: 75.1 (6.5) years, men: 52.6%), 15.7% (156/993) showed polypharmacy. Proportions of polypharmacy were 9.7% (50/516), 16.6% (55/332), and 35.2% (51/145) for people who consulted 1, 2, and  ≥3 medical institutions, respectively. Relative to people who consulted 1 medical institution, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for polypharmacy were 1.50 (0.94-2.37) and 3.34 (1.98-5.65) for those who consulted 2 and  ≥3 medical institutions, respectively. In propensity score matching, of 516 and 477 patients who consulted 1 and  ≥2 medical institutions, 307 pairs were generated. The proportion of polypharmacy was 10.8% (33/307) and 17.3% (53/307), respectively (P = 0.020). The odds ratio for polypharmacy (≥2 vs. 1 consulting medical institution) was 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.09-2.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who consulted more medical institutions were more likely to show polypharmacy. The results could encourage physicians and pharmacists to collect medication information more actively and conduct appropriate medication reviews. Strengthening primary care is needed to address the polypharmacy issue, especially in countries with healthcare systems with free access.

Keywords

References

  1. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Nov;19(11):1186-1187 [PMID: 31746527]
  2. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec;56(12):577-584 [PMID: 30336804]
  3. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jul 9;161(13):1629-34 [PMID: 11434795]
  4. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Dec;62(605):e821-6 [PMID: 23211262]
  5. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173466 [PMID: 28273128]
  6. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(15-16):2942-2952 [PMID: 29603814]
  7. Popul Health Manag. 2018 Apr;21(2):123-129 [PMID: 28683221]
  8. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Jan;18(1):33-41 [PMID: 28786554]
  9. Acute Med Surg. 2015 Aug 27;3(2):107-113 [PMID: 29123761]
  10. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Sep;17(9):1286-1293 [PMID: 27628036]
  11. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):450.e7-12 [PMID: 23647778]
  12. World Med Health Policy. 2018 Mar;10(1):83-98 [PMID: 29610701]
  13. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Jun;16(6):770-1 [PMID: 27246580]
  14. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul - Aug;77:8-12 [PMID: 29587175]
  15. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012 Oct;12(4):761-2 [PMID: 22998384]

Grants

  1. H28-junkankitou-ippan-009 and H30-choju-ippan-007/Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  2. 19AA2007/Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery of Health Care
Female
Health Facilities
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Independent Living
Japan
Male
Polypharmacy
Referral and Consultation
Risk Assessment
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0medicalpolypharmacy1institutionsconsultingconsultedfreeaccesshealthcarepeoplesystempatientsnumberinstitution2respectivelyJapaneseprimarycareriskperformedanalysis ≥26%7% ≥3odds95%confidencemedicationNumberBACKGROUND:allowedconsultmultipleincludingclinicshospitalsgeneralspecialistconsultationwithoutreferralpotentiallyincreasesexaminedassociationMETHODS:Viaself-administeredquestionnaireidentifiedaged≥65 years≥1disease ≥1city2016exposureinterestor ≥3outcomeuse≥6typesdrugsmultivariatelogisticregressionadjustingagesexhouseholdeconomytypecomorbiditiesminimizeconfoundingeffectsalsopropensity-score-matchedcategorizingtwogroups:RESULTS:993eligibleindividualsmeanstandarddeviationage:7565yearsmen:5215156/993showedProportions950/5161655/332352%51/145Relativeadjustedratiosintervals50094-23733498-565propensityscorematching516477307pairsgeneratedproportion108%33/307173%53/307P = 0020ratio≥2vs73interval09-276CONCLUSIONS:PatientslikelyshowresultsencouragephysicianspharmacistscollectinformationactivelyconductappropriatereviewsStrengtheningneededaddressissueespeciallycountriessystemscommunity-dwellingolderaccess:cross-sectionalstudyJapanFreeMultipleconsultationsPolypharmacy

Similar Articles

Cited By