"Midwives do not appreciate pregnant women who come to the maternity with torn and dirty clothing": institutional delivery and postnatal care in Torit County, South Sudan: a mixed method study.

Pontius Bayo, Loubna Belaid, Elijo Omoro Tahir, Emmanuel Ochola, Alexander Dimiti, Donato Greco, Christina Zarowsky
Author Information
  1. Pontius Bayo: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Torit State Hospital, Torit, South Sudan. pontiusby@gmail.com.
  2. Loubna Belaid: Department of family medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Elijo Omoro Tahir: State ministry of Health, Imotong state, Torit, South Sudan.
  4. Emmanuel Ochola: Department of public health, St, Mary's Hospital Lacor, Gulu, Uganda.
  5. Alexander Dimiti: Ministry of health, Juba, South Sudan.
  6. Donato Greco: School of public health, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  7. Christina Zarowsky: School of Public Health, Montreal University, Montreal, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: South Sudan has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world, at 789 deaths per 100,000 live births. The majority of these deaths are due to complications during labor and delivery. Institutional delivery under the care of skilled attendants is a proven, effective intervention to avert some deaths. The aim was to determine the prevalence and explore the factors that affect utilization of health facilities for routine delivery and postnatal care in Torit County, South Sudan.
METHODS: A convergent parallel mixed method design combined a community survey among women who had delivered in the previous 12 months selected through a multistage sampling technique (n = 418) with an exploratory descriptive qualitative study. Interviews (n = 19) were conducted with policymakers, staff from non-governmental organizations and health workers. Focus group discussions (n = 12) were conducted among men and women within the communities. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to determine independent factors associated with institutional delivery. Thematic analysis was undertaken for the qualitative data.
RESULTS: Of 418 participants who had delivered in the previous 12 months, 27.7% had institutional deliveries and 22.5% attended postnatal care at least once within 42 days following delivery. Four or more antenatal care visits increased institutional delivery 5 times (p < 0.001). The participants who had an institutional delivery were younger (mean age 23.3 years old) than those who had home deliveries (mean age 25.6 years). Any previous payments made for delivery in the health facility doubled the risk of home delivery (p = 0.021). Women were more likely to plan and prepare for home delivery than for institutional delivery and sought institutional delivery when complications arose. Perceived poor quality of care due to absence of health staff and lack of supplies was reported as a major barrier to institutional delivery. Women emphasized fear of discrimination based on social and economic status. Unofficial payments such as soap and sweets were reported as routine expectations and another major barrier to institutional delivery.
CONCLUSION: Interventions to stop unofficial payments and discrimination based on socio-economic status and to increase access to ANC, delivery services and PNC are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71 [PMID: 25238684]
  2. Afr J Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;20(3):108-117 [PMID: 29553200]
  3. Geospat Health. 2017 May 11;12(1):510 [PMID: 28555479]
  4. Med Anthropol Q. 2011 Dec;25(4):479-98 [PMID: 22338291]
  5. Midwifery. 2014 Feb;30(2):262-8 [PMID: 23790959]
  6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 03;9:89 [PMID: 19493354]
  7. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Sep;122(3):263-5 [PMID: 23809657]
  8. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jul;17(5):862-8 [PMID: 22736032]
  9. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192428 [PMID: 29420598]
  10. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12 [PMID: 7613363]
  11. Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 19;14(1):12 [PMID: 28103891]
  12. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003 Apr-Jun;15(2):49-52 [PMID: 14552250]
  13. Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74 [PMID: 26584737]
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 21;12:412 [PMID: 23171417]
  15. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):102 [PMID: 28351350]
  16. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33 [PMID: 25103301]
  17. Health Policy Plan. 2014 Mar;29(2):137-50 [PMID: 23372035]
  18. Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):599-606 [PMID: 27475823]
  19. Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):9 [PMID: 28095911]
  20. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 02;16(1):129 [PMID: 27251052]
  21. Reprod Health. 2017 Nov 29;14(1):161 [PMID: 29187210]
  22. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2016 May 23;4:4 [PMID: 27217953]
  23. Reprod Health. 2013 Aug 20;10:40 [PMID: 23962135]
  24. Health Policy Plan. 2015 Apr;30(3):309-21 [PMID: 24633914]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110 [PMID: 8042057]
  26. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 11;8:769 [PMID: 26651489]
  27. J Transcult Nurs. 2003 Apr;14(2):100-7 [PMID: 12772618]
  28. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):984-8 [PMID: 19822558]
  29. Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 13;14(1):6 [PMID: 28086926]
  30. Glob Health Action. 2016 Jul 28;9:29693 [PMID: 27473675]
  31. PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847 [PMID: 26126110]
  32. Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1:2 [PMID: 24643545]
  33. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug 11;9:34 [PMID: 19671156]
  34. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 16;13:5 [PMID: 23324550]
  35. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0168083 [PMID: 27977745]
  36. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Aug;16(6):1139-42 [PMID: 21959924]
  37. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 12;14:268 [PMID: 25112432]
  38. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(Suppl 7):621 [PMID: 28185588]
  39. Midwifery. 2013 Oct;29(10):1206-10 [PMID: 23751594]
  40. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):760-8 [PMID: 20579797]
  41. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252 [PMID: 30196093]
  42. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 24;13:21 [PMID: 23347548]
  43. Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1666-72 [PMID: 19608959]

Grants

  1. 108032-001 & 108032-002 MOCHELASS/IMCHA/IDRC

MeSH Term

Administrative Personnel
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Delivery, Obstetric
Female
Focus Groups
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
Health Services Accessibility
Home Childbirth
Humans
Male
Maternal Health Services
Organizations
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Pregnancy
Pregnant People
Qualitative Research
Socioeconomic Factors
South Sudan
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0deliverycareinstitutionalhealthSouthpaymentsSudandeathspostnatalwomenpreviousconductedhomeduecomplicationsInstitutionaldeterminefactorsroutineToritCountymixedmethodamongdelivered12 monthsqualitativestudystaffwithinparticipantsdeliveriesmeanageWomenreportedmajorbarrierdiscriminationbasedstatusaccessservicesBACKGROUND:onehighestmaternalmortalityratiosworld789per100000livebirthsmajoritylaborskilledattendantsproveneffectiveinterventionavertaimprevalenceexploreaffectutilizationfacilitiesMETHODS:convergentparalleldesigncombinedcommunitysurveyselectedmultistagesamplingtechniquen = 418exploratorydescriptiveInterviewsn = 19policymakersnon-governmentalorganizationsworkersFocusgroupdiscussionsn = 12mencommunitiesBivariatemultivariatelogisticregressionindependentassociatedThematicanalysisundertakendataRESULTS:418277%225%attendedleast42 daysfollowingFourantenatalvisitsincreased5timesp < 0001younger233 yearsold256 yearsmadefacilitydoubledriskp = 0021likelyplanpreparesoughtarosePerceivedpoorqualityabsencelacksuppliesemphasizedfearsocialeconomicUnofficialsoapsweetsexpectationsanotherCONCLUSION:Interventionsstopunofficialsocio-economicincreaseANCPNCneeded"Midwivesappreciatepregnantcomematernitytorndirtyclothing":Sudan:DeterminantsIn-kindMaternalMixedmethodsPostnatalQualityRespectfulSocialstigma

Similar Articles

Cited By