Educator's Learning Alignment Instrument (ELAI).

Robert D Vining, Timothy Millard
Author Information

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the development and initial testing of a questionnaire designed to assess the concept of learning alignment within chiropractic college courses.
METHODS: A 36-item questionnaire, Educator's Learning Alignment Instrument (ELAI), was created to evaluate how learning goals, course activities, and assessments align within a college course. Questionnaire development was informed by learning theories and tested using a 2-phased electronic survey mechanism among a chiropractic college faculty. Phase 1 included completing the ELAI for a currently implemented course. Phase 2 included questions about confidential reports generated from ELAI data.
RESULTS: Thirty-one of 46 (67%) respondents completed an ELAI. Twelve (38%) participated in phase 2. Twenty-one (68%) courses demonstrated consistent learning focus across goals, activities, and assessments. Aggregate data from early, middle, and late chiropractic program courses revealed progressive shifts toward higher-level learning. Eighty-seven percent of courses contained 1 or more individual learning areas with potentially misaligned goals, activities, or assessment. Ninety-seven percent of respondents completed ELAI questions within 20 minutes. Most (87%) phase 2 respondents noted the report accurately reflected the course. Sixty-seven percent of phase 2 respondents agreed that confidential reports provided useful information to inform course design.
CONCLUSION: The ELAI is a nonburdensome instrument that can facilitate faculty reflection on how aligned learning concepts are applied in a course and provide novel data to assess general learning focus within college courses and within programs. Results indicate ELAI questions can be revised to improve clarity. Additional research comparing ELAI responses from experts, peer educators, and students is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(4):195-201 [PMID: 26776330]
  2. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 May;18(2):305-17 [PMID: 22367055]
  3. J Chiropr Educ. 2010 Fall;24(2):194-7 [PMID: 21048882]
  4. J Chiropr Educ. 2016 Oct;30(2):99-103 [PMID: 27115474]
  5. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Mar;40(1):17-25 [PMID: 26847253]
  6. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):732-9 [PMID: 22542770]
  7. J Chiropr Educ. 2011 Fall;25(2):125-31 [PMID: 22069337]
  8. J Chiropr Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):43-49 [PMID: 29257708]
  9. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):517-24 [PMID: 22879372]
  10. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e867-98 [PMID: 22938677]
  11. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Apr;36(2):106-8 [PMID: 22487341]
  12. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Jun;40(2):147-56 [PMID: 27068989]
  13. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e102-15 [PMID: 22289008]
  14. Med Teach. 2013 Nov;35(11):e1561-72 [PMID: 24004029]
  15. Altern Ther Health Med. 1998 Sep;4(5):64-75 [PMID: 9737032]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ELAIlearningcoursewithincoursescollege2respondentschiropracticLearninggoalsactivitiesquestionsdataphasepercentreportdevelopmentquestionnaireassessEducator'sAlignmentInstrumentassessmentsfacultyPhase1includedconfidentialreportscompletedfocuscanOBJECTIVE:initialtestingdesignedconceptalignmentMETHODS:36-itemcreatedevaluatealignQuestionnaireinformedtheoriestestedusing2-phasedelectronicsurveymechanismamongcompletingcurrentlyimplementedgeneratedRESULTS:Thirty-one4667%Twelve38%participatedTwenty-one68%demonstratedconsistentacrossAggregateearlymiddlelateprogramrevealedprogressiveshiftstowardhigher-levelEighty-sevencontainedindividualareaspotentiallymisalignedassessmentNinety-seven20minutes87%notedaccuratelyreflectedSixty-sevenagreedprovidedusefulinformationinformdesignCONCLUSION:nonburdensomeinstrumentfacilitatereflectionalignedconceptsappliedprovidenovelgeneralprogramsResultsindicaterevisedimproveclarityAdditionalresearchcomparingresponsesexpertspeereducatorsstudentsrecommendedBehaviorismChiropracticCognitivismCurriculumEducation

Similar Articles

Cited By