Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Musa acuminata Stem.

Maharani Laillyza Apriasari, Selviana Rizky Pramitha, Dewi Puspitasari, Diah Savitri Ernawati
Author Information
  1. Maharani Laillyza Apriasari: Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Lambung Mangkurat University, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia.
  2. Selviana Rizky Pramitha: Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Lambung Mangkurat University, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia.
  3. Dewi Puspitasari: Department of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry, Lambung Mangkurat University, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia.
  4. Diah Savitri Ernawati: Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:  This study was designed to assess the anti-inflammatory effect of through the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and nuclear factor kappa β (NF-κB) after 3 days of application of (MASE) gel on oral mucosal wound.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:  An experimental study with post-test only control group design was conducted. Twenty male (Wistar) were injured on their left buccal mucosa and treated three times a day with MASE gel of varying concentrations: 0% (as control), MASE 25%, MASE 37.5%, and MASE 50%. On day 3, a biopsy was performed on each mucosal wound for later immunohistochemical analysis for the expressions of TNF-α and NF-κB.
RESULTS:  The highest expression of TNF-α was observed in the control group (13.20 ± 1.79), while the lowest was in the treatment group using 50% MASE (6.40 ± 1.14). Meanwhile the comparison between treatment groups did not highlight any significant difference ( > 0.05). The highest expression of NF-κB was observed in the control group (13.20 ± 1.30), whereas the lowest was in the treatment group using MASE 50% (6.40 ± 1.14). NF-κB was significantly lower in the treatment group using MASE 50% when compared with other treatment groups ( < 0.05).
CONCLUSION:  Application of MASE on mucosal wound reduces the expression of TNF-α and NF-κB at all concentrations. The anti-inflammatory effect of MASE 50% was the strongest one.

References

  1. Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Aug;169(8):1672-92 [PMID: 23425071]
  2. Am J Pathol. 2011 Jan;178(1):19-25 [PMID: 21224038]
  3. J Cell Sci. 2001 Jan;114(Pt 1):131-139 [PMID: 11112697]
  4. Genes (Basel). 2018 Jan 09;9(1): [PMID: 29315242]
  5. Toxicol Pathol. 2012;40(2):166-73 [PMID: 22089838]
  6. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Spring;45(2):27-37 [PMID: 17426506]
  7. An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;91(5):614-620 [PMID: 27828635]
  8. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009 Dec;1(6):a001651 [PMID: 20457564]
  9. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2: [PMID: 29158945]
  10. Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Aug;20(4):189-193 [PMID: 28712679]
  11. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jul;54(7):740-51 [PMID: 25808157]
  12. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012 Mar;56(3):454-65 [PMID: 22147524]
  13. Eur J Dent. 2019 May;13(2):271-279 [PMID: 31487751]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MASEgroupNF-κB50%treatmentexpressionTNF-αcontrol±1mucosalwoundusingstudyanti-inflammatoryeffect3geldayhighestobserved1320lowest64014groups005OBJECTIVE: Thisdesignedassesstumornecrosisfactor-αnuclearfactorkappaβdaysapplicationoralMATERIALSANDMETHODS: Anexperimentalpost-testdesignconductedTwentymaleWistarinjuredleftbuccalmucosatreatedthreetimesvaryingconcentrations:0%25%375%biopsyperformedlaterimmunohistochemicalanalysisexpressionsRESULTS: The79Meanwhilecomparisonhighlightsignificantdifference>30whereassignificantlylowercompared<CONCLUSION: ApplicationreducesconcentrationsstrongestoneAnti-InflammatoryEffectMusaacuminataStem

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)