"An ethnographic exploration of factors that drive policing of street-based female sex workers in a U.S. setting - identifying opportunities for intervention".

Katherine H A Footer, Bradley E Silberzahn, Sahnah Lim, Steven Huettner, Victor A Kumar, Derek Loeffler, Sarah M Peitzmeier, Susan G Sherman
Author Information
  1. Katherine H A Footer: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. kfooter1@gmail.com.
  2. Bradley E Silberzahn: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  3. Sahnah Lim: New York University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health and Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
  4. Steven Huettner: Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 5200 Eastern Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
  5. Victor A Kumar: Johns Hopkins Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Anthropology, 466 Mergenthaler Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
  6. Derek Loeffler: Baltimore City Police Department, Northwestern District, 5271 Reistertown Road, Baltimore, MD, 21215, USA.
  7. Sarah M Peitzmeier: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Publissc Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  8. Susan G Sherman: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Building on a broader sociological discourse around policing approaches towards vulnerable populations, increasing public health and human rights evidence points to policing practices as a key health determinant, particularly among street-based sex workers. Despite the importance of policing as a structural health determinant, few studies have sought to understand the factors that underlie and shape harmful policing practices towards sex workers. This study therefore aimed to explore the drivers for policing attitudes and practices towards street-based cisgender female sex workers.
METHODS: Drawing on ethnographic methods, 280 h of observations with police patrol and 10 stakeholder interviews with senior police leadership in Baltimore City, USA were carried out to better understand the drivers for policing strategies towards cisgender female sex workers. Analysis was data- and theory-driven, drawing on the concepts of police culture and complementary criminological and sociological literature that aided exploration of the influence of the ecological and structural environment on policing practices.
RESULTS: Ecological factors at the structural (e.g., criminalization), organizational (e.g., violent crime control), community and individual level (e.g., stigmatizing attitudes) emerged as key to shaping individual police practices and attitudes towards cisgender female sex workers in this setting. Findings indicate senior police support for increased alignment with public health and human rights goals. However, the study highlights that interventions need to move beyond individual officer training and address the broader structural and organizational setting in which harmful police practices towards sex work operate.
CONCLUSIONS: A more in-depth understanding of the circumstances that drive law enforcement approaches to street-based sex work is critical to the collaborative design of interventions with police in different settings. In considering public health-police partnerships to address the rights and health of sex worker populations in the U.S. and elsewhere, this study supports existing calls for decriminalization of sex work, supported by institutional and policy reforms, neighborhood-level dialogues that shift the cultural landscape around sex work within both the police and larger community, and innovative individual-level police trainings.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Drug Policy. 2011 Mar;22(2):87-94 [PMID: 21392957]
  2. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2001;12:242-89 [PMID: 12666742]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:154-61 [PMID: 25703668]
  4. Harm Reduct J. 2012 Jul 09;9:27 [PMID: 22769590]
  5. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013 May 24;16:18626 [PMID: 23706178]
  6. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014 Mar;9(2):174-82 [PMID: 24464089]
  7. Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2012-5 [PMID: 21940924]
  8. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 25;6(4):e19048 [PMID: 21541349]
  9. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Apr;19(2):140-7 [PMID: 18207725]
  10. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 02;4(6):e005191 [PMID: 24889853]
  11. Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):55-71 [PMID: 25059947]
  12. Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):186-99 [PMID: 25059943]
  13. Eval Program Plann. 2017 Oct;64:49-56 [PMID: 28531654]
  14. Br J Sociol. 2007 Mar;58(1):1-19 [PMID: 17343635]
  15. Harm Reduct J. 2012 Jul 09;9:32 [PMID: 22770379]
  16. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012 May;31(5):403-10 [PMID: 22767041]
  17. PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 11;15(12):e1002680 [PMID: 30532209]
  18. BMJ. 2009 Aug 11;339:b2939 [PMID: 19671935]
  19. AIDS Behav. 2015 Jun;19(6):1108-15 [PMID: 25354735]
  20. Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jul 3;52(8):1003-1010 [PMID: 28318343]
  21. Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Sep;38(7):1137-50 [PMID: 27113456]
  22. Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(2):289-295 [PMID: 30571295]
  23. Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan;25(1):96-104 [PMID: 23916802]
  24. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Apr 15;80(5):513-521 [PMID: 30649029]
  25. Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb;95(2):233-6 [PMID: 15671455]
  26. Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):e42-54 [PMID: 24625169]
  27. Harm Reduct J. 2012 May 16;9:17 [PMID: 22591836]
  28. J Infect Dis. 2011 Dec 1;204 Suppl 5:S1223-8 [PMID: 22043036]
  29. Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):125-56 [PMID: 15016246]
  30. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Jul 18;19(4 Suppl 3):20883 [PMID: 27435716]
  31. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0134900 [PMID: 26488904]
  32. Sexualities. 2017 Dec;20(8):881-903 [PMID: 29379380]
  33. Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Mar;37(3):437-51 [PMID: 25688450]
  34. Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Jan;19(1):47-50 [PMID: 18275647]
  35. J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Winter;30(4):548-59 [PMID: 12561263]

Grants

  1. R01 DA038499/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Anthropology, Cultural
Female
Human Rights
Humans
Police
Public Health
Sex Workers
United States
Vulnerable Populations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sexpolicepolicingtowardspracticesworkershealthfemaleworkrightsstreet-basedstructuralpublicfactorsstudyattitudescisgenderegindividualsettinginterventionsbroadersociologicalaroundapproachespopulationshumankeydeterminantunderstandharmfuldriversethnographicseniorexplorationorganizationalcommunityaddressdriveUSBACKGROUND:BuildingdiscoursevulnerableincreasingevidencepointsparticularlyamongDespiteimportancestudiessoughtunderlieshapethereforeaimedexploreMETHODS:Drawingmethods280 hobservationspatrol10stakeholderinterviewsleadershipBaltimoreCityUSAcarriedbetterstrategiesAnalysisdata-theory-drivendrawingconceptsculturecomplementarycriminologicalliteratureaidedinfluenceecologicalenvironmentRESULTS:EcologicalcriminalizationviolentcrimecontrollevelstigmatizingemergedshapingFindingsindicatesupportincreasedalignmentgoalsHoweverhighlightsneedmovebeyondofficertrainingoperateCONCLUSIONS:in-depthunderstandingcircumstanceslawenforcementcriticalcollaborativedesigndifferentsettingsconsideringhealth-policepartnershipsworkerelsewheresupportsexistingcallsdecriminalizationsupportedinstitutionalpolicyreformsneighborhood-leveldialoguesshiftculturallandscapewithinlargerinnovativeindividual-leveltrainings"An-identifyingopportunitiesintervention"CisgenderHealthHumanPolicingSexStructural

Similar Articles

Cited By