Study within a trial (SWAT) protocol. Investigating the effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitations on recruitment: An embedded randomised controlled recruitment trial.

Joanne Woodford, Kajsa Norbäck, Josefin Hagström, Helena Grönqvist, Adwoa Parker, Catherine Arundel, Louise von Essen
Author Information
  1. Joanne Woodford: Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme (U-CARE), Uppsala University, Sweden.
  2. Kajsa Norbäck: Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme (U-CARE), Uppsala University, Sweden.
  3. Josefin Hagström: Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme (U-CARE), Uppsala University, Sweden.
  4. Helena Grönqvist: Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme (U-CARE), Uppsala University, Sweden.
  5. Adwoa Parker: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, United Kingdom.
  6. Catherine Arundel: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, United Kingdom.
  7. Louise von Essen: Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University Psychosocial Care Programme (U-CARE), Uppsala University, Sweden.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recruitment into clinical trials is a common challenge experienced by healthcare researchers. Currently, there is little evidence regarding strategies to improve recruitment into clinical trials. However, preliminary research suggests the personalisation of study invitation letters may increase recruitment rates. As such, there is a need to investigate the effectiveness of personalisation strategies on trial recruitment rates. This study within a trial (SWAT) will investigate the effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitation letters on recruitment rates into the host trial ENGAGE, a feasibility study of an internet-administered, guided, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT) based self-help intervention for parents of children previously treated for cancer.
METHODS: An embedded randomised controlled trial (RCT) will investigate the effectiveness of a personalised study invitation letter including the potential participant's name and address compared with a standard, non-personalised letter without name or address, on participant recruitment rates into the ENGAGE study. The primary outcome is differences in the proportion of participants recruited, examined using logistic regression. Results will be reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
DISCUSSION: Even moderate effects of the personalisation of study invitation letters on recruitment rates could be of significant value by shortening study length, saving resources, and providing a faster answer to the clinical question posed by the study. This protocol can be used as a template for other researchers who wish to contribute to the evidence base for trial decision-making, by embedding a similar SWAT into their trial.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 57233429; ISRCTN 18404129; SWAT 112, Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository (2018 OCT 1 1231).

Keywords

References

  1. Trials. 2014 Jul 03;15:264 [PMID: 24993581]
  2. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e015276 [PMID: 28320800]
  3. Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3825-3835 [PMID: 29862497]
  4. F1000Res. 2020 Feb 26;9:154 [PMID: 32399201]
  5. Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):533-542 [PMID: 30165760]
  6. Trials. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):613 [PMID: 31661029]
  7. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Apr;23(2):504-14 [PMID: 9104007]
  8. BMJ. 2015 Sep 25;351:h4923 [PMID: 26408289]
  9. PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127242 [PMID: 26011295]
  10. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e103340 [PMID: 25058607]
  11. Trials. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):618 [PMID: 31666093]
  12. Acta Oncol. 2018 Jul;57(7):950-957 [PMID: 29498559]
  13. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):641-8 [PMID: 21570485]
  14. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 21;14(6):e0218860 [PMID: 31226159]
  15. J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:274-90 [PMID: 25451427]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 18;3:CD009660 [PMID: 30883665]
  17. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332 [PMID: 20332509]
  18. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:70-77 [PMID: 32151697]
  19. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0203127 [PMID: 30157250]
  20. Trials. 2019 Jul 24;20(1):453 [PMID: 31340853]
  21. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 18;20(4):e133 [PMID: 29669710]
  22. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 17;14:23 [PMID: 24533721]
  23. Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139 [PMID: 29475444]
  24. Trials. 2014 Oct 25;15:407 [PMID: 25344684]
  25. BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453 [PMID: 28768629]
  26. Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):33 [PMID: 31910861]
  27. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Aug 28;14:125 [PMID: 23981474]
  28. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Aug 19;15:66 [PMID: 26286486]
  29. Psychooncology. 2015 Dec;24(12):1792-8 [PMID: 26042579]
  30. Trials. 2019 Feb 19;20(1):141 [PMID: 30782209]
  31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8 [PMID: 22169081]
  32. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2:MR000013 [PMID: 29468635]
  33. Trials. 2016 Jan 14;17:27 [PMID: 26767365]
  34. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e023708 [PMID: 29903802]

Grants

  1. MR/R013748/1/Medical Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trialstudyrecruitmentSWATratesinvitationwithincontrolledclinicalpersonalisationlettersinvestigatewillpersonalisednon-personalisedrandomisedISRCTNTrialsStudyRecruitmenttrialsresearchersevidencestrategieseffectivenesseffectversusENGAGECognitive-BehaviouralTherapyCBTembeddedRCTletternameaddressprotocolRandomisedINTRODUCTION:commonchallengeexperiencedhealthcareCurrentlylittleregardingimproveHoweverpreliminaryresearchsuggestsmayincreaseneedhostfeasibilityinternet-administeredguidedbasedself-helpinterventionparentschildrenpreviouslytreatedcancerMETHODS:includingpotentialparticipant'scomparedstandardwithoutparticipantprimaryoutcomedifferencesproportionparticipantsrecruitedexaminedusinglogisticregressionResultsreportedadjustedoddsratios95%confidenceintervalsDISCUSSION:Evenmoderateeffectssignificantvalueshorteninglengthsavingresourcesprovidingfasteranswerquestionposedcanusedtemplatewishcontributebasedecision-makingembeddingsimilarTRIALREGISTRATION:5723342918404129112NorthernIrelandHubMethodologyResearchrepository2018OCT11231Investigatinginvitationsrecruitment:CONSORTConsolidatedStandardsReportingEmbeddedInternationalStandardControlledNumber

Similar Articles

Cited By