Strengthening health systems response to violence against women: protocol to test approaches to train health workers in India.

Sarah R Meyer, Sangeeta Rege, Prachi Avalaskar, Padma Deosthali, Claudia García-Moreno, Avni Amin
Author Information
  1. Sarah R Meyer: 1Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. Sangeeta Rege: CEHAT-Centre for Inquiry into Health and Allied Themes, Mumbai, India.
  3. Prachi Avalaskar: CEHAT-Centre for Inquiry into Health and Allied Themes, Mumbai, India.
  4. Padma Deosthali: CEHAT-Centre for Inquiry into Health and Allied Themes, Mumbai, India.
  5. Claudia García-Moreno: 1Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  6. Avni Amin: 1Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, including in low- and middle-income [LMIC] countries, there is increased attention to and investment in interventions to prevent and respond to violence against women; however, most of these approaches are delivered outside of formal or informal health systems. The World Health Organization published clinical and policy guidelines in 2013. Further evidence is needed concerning implementation of the Guidelines, including how health care providers perceive training interventions, if the training approach meets their needs and is of relevance to them and how to ensure sustainability of changes in practice due to training. This manuscript describes a study protocol for a mixed methods study of the implementation of the Guidelines and related tools in tertiary hospitals in two districts in Maharashtra, India.
METHODS: The study will employ a mixed-methods study design. A quantitative assessment of health care providers' and managers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices will be conducted pre, post, and 6 months after the training. Qualitative methods will include a participatory stakeholders' meeting to inform the design of the training intervention design, in-depth interviews [IDIs] and focus-group discussions [FGDs] with health care providers and managers 3-6 months after training, and IDIs with women who have disclosed violence to a trained health care provider, approximately 6 months after training. The study will also validate two tools: a readiness assessment of health facilities and a health management information system form in a facility register format which will be used to document cases of violence.
DISCUSSION: The multiple components of this study will generate data to improve our understanding of how implementation of the Guidelines works, what barriers and facilitators to implementation exist in this context, and how current implementation practices result in changes in terms of health services and providers' practices of responding to women affected by violence. The results will be useful for governmental and non-governmental and United Nations Agency efforts to improve health systems and services for women affected by violence, as well as for researchers working on health systems responses to violence against women in India and possibly other contexts.

Keywords

References

  1. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):112-121 [PMID: 24814988]
  2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 31;5:CD012423 [PMID: 34057734]
  3. J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jun;32(11):1591-1619 [PMID: 26092654]
  4. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(4):388-96 [PMID: 15500533]
  5. Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):1052-67 [PMID: 19674432]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):79-86 [PMID: 21676510]
  7. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011 Feb;2(1):7-10 [PMID: 22956930]
  8. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;120(1):3-9 [PMID: 22959631]
  9. Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1555-66 [PMID: 25467575]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 1;38(11):1586-91 [PMID: 15156447]
  11. BMC Med. 2017 Jul 12;15(1):128 [PMID: 28697769]
  12. J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jun;2(2):75-83 [PMID: 21483202]
  13. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 18;13:65 [PMID: 23419141]
  14. Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1534-42 [PMID: 18983279]
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 5;16(1):630 [PMID: 27814706]
  16. Lancet. 2008 Apr 5;371(9619):1165-72 [PMID: 18395577]
  17. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 21;9:25 [PMID: 21693029]
  18. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;100(4):700-5 [PMID: 12383537]
  19. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2):173-180 [PMID: 16459217]
  20. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):188-94 [PMID: 24439354]
  21. PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 11;13(10):e1002156 [PMID: 27727282]
  22. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 9;166(1):22-37 [PMID: 16401807]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 23;15:1165 [PMID: 26597715]
  24. BMC Public Health. 2007 Jan 24;7:12 [PMID: 17250771]
  25. Lancet. 2011 Nov 19;378(9805):1788-95 [PMID: 22000683]
  26. Glob Health Action. 2011;4:7288 [PMID: 22028679]
  27. Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1567-79 [PMID: 25467583]
  28. BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3:32 [PMID: 26376626]
  29. Glob Health Action. 2014 Sep 12;7:24588 [PMID: 25226415]
  30. Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 08;7:325 [PMID: 31781528]
  31. BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):529-39 [PMID: 26701735]
  32. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(2):199-210 [PMID: 24969913]
  33. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):249-58 [PMID: 23598181]
  34. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):439-452 [PMID: 26011652]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthviolencetrainingwillwomenstudyimplementationsystemsGuidelinescareprotocolIndiadesignpracticesincludinginterventionsapproachesproviderschangesmethodstwoassessmentproviders'6 monthsimproveservicesaffectedBACKGROUND:Globallylow-middle-income[LMIC]countriesincreasedattentioninvestmentpreventrespondhoweverdeliveredoutsideformalinformalWorldHealthOrganizationpublishedclinicalpolicyguidelines2013evidenceneededconcerningperceiveapproachmeetsneedsrelevanceensuresustainabilitypracticeduemanuscriptdescribesmixedrelatedtoolstertiaryhospitalsdistrictsMaharashtraMETHODS:employmixed-methodsquantitativemanagers'knowledgeattitudesconductedprepostQualitativeincludeparticipatorystakeholders'meetinginforminterventionin-depthinterviews[IDIs]focus-groupdiscussions[FGDs]managers3-6 monthsIDIsdisclosedtrainedproviderapproximatelyalsovalidatetools:readinessfacilitiesmanagementinformationsystemformfacilityregisterformatuseddocumentcasesDISCUSSION:multiplecomponentsgeneratedataunderstandingworksbarriersfacilitatorsexistcontextcurrentresulttermsrespondingresultsusefulgovernmentalnon-governmentalUnitedNationsAgencyeffortswellresearchersworkingresponsespossiblycontextsStrengtheningresponsewomen:testtrainworkersImplementationscienceStudyTrainingViolence

Similar Articles

Cited By