Healthcare students' knowledge, attitude and perception of pharmacovigilance: A systematic review.

Monira Alwhaibi, Noha A Al Aloola
Author Information
  1. Monira Alwhaibi: Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ORCID
  2. Noha A Al Aloola: Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to evaluate the existing evidence about the knowledge, attitude, and perceptions (KAP) of healthcare students towards pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions reporting (ADRs).
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via OVID. This review restricted the search to studies published in English from inception until December 2019.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was healthcare students' knowledge, attitude, and perceptions of pharmacovigilance.
RESULTS: Of the 664 articles identified, twenty-nine studies were included in the review. Overall, healthcare students vary in their knowledge and attitude towards pharmacovigilance and ADRs reporting. There was inconsistency in measuring KAP between the studies and the main drawback in the literature is lacking validated KAP measures.
CONCLUSIONS: In summation, optimal KAP assessment can be achieved through developing a standard validated measure. Our future healthcare providers should have basics pharmacovigilance knowledge in order to rationally reporting ADRs and preventing serious health problems.

References

  1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;74(10):1235-1248 [PMID: 29926135]
  2. Saudi Pharm J. 2016 Sep;24(5):600-604 [PMID: 27752233]
  3. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  4. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 May;124(5):591-599 [PMID: 30417555]
  5. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 May;120(5):475-481 [PMID: 27883270]
  6. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):154-8 [PMID: 26605155]
  7. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):223-8 [PMID: 22745046]
  8. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Mar;8(3):32-4 [PMID: 24783073]
  9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 [PMID: 18313558]
  10. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):FC09-FC13 [PMID: 28764191]
  11. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2020;31(1):15-24 [PMID: 31594254]
  12. Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1003-1011 [PMID: 29949100]
  13. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 12;10(1):273 [PMID: 28697738]
  14. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015 Jun 17;12:28 [PMID: 26072906]
  15. Drug Saf. 2010 Aug 1;33(8):689-703 [PMID: 20635827]
  16. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):964-969 [PMID: 28989138]
  17. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):194 [PMID: 23275659]
  18. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Apr 15;74(8):606-612 [PMID: 28235869]
  19. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):131 [PMID: 21969717]
  20. Drug Saf. 2014 Oct;37(10):743-59 [PMID: 25171836]
  21. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):779-785 [PMID: 29233304]
  22. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Aug;48(4):739-47 [PMID: 25338257]
  23. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Jun 10;75(5):96 [PMID: 21829270]

MeSH Term

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
Humans
Pharmacovigilance
Students, Health Occupations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0knowledgereviewattitudeKAPhealthcarepharmacovigilancereportingADRsstudiesperceptionsstudentstowardssystematicliteraturesearchstudents'validatedOBJECTIVE:objectiveevaluateexistingevidenceadversedrugreactionsMETHODS:conductedusingMEDLINECINAHLEMBASEERICCochraneDatabaseSystematicReviewsviaOVIDrestrictedpublishedEnglishinceptionDecember2019PRIMARYANDSECONDARYOUTCOMEMEASURES:primaryoutcomeRESULTS:664articlesidentifiedtwenty-nineincludedOverallvaryinconsistencymeasuringmaindrawbacklackingmeasuresCONCLUSIONS:summationoptimalassessmentcanachieveddevelopingstandardmeasurefutureprovidersbasicsorderrationallypreventingserioushealthproblemsHealthcareperceptionpharmacovigilance:

Similar Articles

Cited By