Safety and Efficacy of a Disposable Vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Omar Felipe Duenas-Garcia, Robert Edward Shapiro, Peter Gaccione
Author Information
  1. Omar Felipe Duenas-Garcia: From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University Medical School, Morgantown, WV.
  2. Robert Edward Shapiro: From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University Medical School, Morgantown, WV.
  3. Peter Gaccione: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an over-the-counter device for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in females.
METHODS: A multicenter, interventional, single-arm study involving 5 different sites was conducted including women diagnosed with symptomatic SUI using a self-inserted pessary device. A 1-week baseline period was followed by a 2-week period of wearing the device. The main outcome of our study was to determine if the device was able to reduce at least 50% the number of leakage events and pad weight.
RESULTS: Across all study sites, 73 subjects were enrolled and 51 completed the study. Efficacy analyses were conducted on the modified intent-to-treat population (n = 48), whereas the safety analysis was conducted on all consented participants. The average pad weight gain was 0.9 g/h at baseline and 0.5 g/h during the treatment phase. The number of leakage episodes per day decreased from 2 at baseline to 0.9 during the treatment phase (P < 0.0001). Seventy-one percent of the study population experienced a more than 50% reduction in leakage volume, leakage episodes, or both. The quality of life scores improved from baseline to posttreatment phase by 4.35 points on average (P < 0.0001). A total of 40 adverse events were recorded, and only 4 subjects withdrew due to adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: The self-deployable pessary device evaluated in this study is an alternative option for women seeking an over-the-counter method to manage symptoms of SUI. Further studies are required to determine the long-term effects and compliance using the device.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03323723

References

  1. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 17;10:195-201 [PMID: 29713205]
  2. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;38(2):97-111 [PMID: 26883864]
  3. Res Rep Urol. 2019 Apr 17;11:111-121 [PMID: 31114767]
  4. Urology. 2019 Nov;133:91-95 [PMID: 31415780]
  5. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):609-617 [PMID: 20177294]
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):1120-1122 [PMID: 26488516]
  7. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Sep;82(3):327-38 [PMID: 14499979]
  8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Feb;40(2):e119-e125 [PMID: 29447716]
  9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):594.e1-7 [PMID: 18377862]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 03;(11):CD010551 [PMID: 26526663]

Grants

  1. U54 GM104942/NIGMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Disposable Equipment
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Pessaries
Self Care
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence, Stress
Vagina

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studydevice0baselineleakagetreatmentSUIconductedeventsphasesafetyover-the-counter5siteswomenusingpessaryperioddetermine50%numberpadweightsubjectsEfficacypopulationaverage9g/hepisodesP<00014adverseOBJECTIVE:aimevaluateefficacystressurinaryincontinencefemalesMETHODS:multicenterinterventionalsingle-arminvolvingdifferentincludingdiagnosedsymptomaticself-inserted1-weekfollowed2-weekwearingmainoutcomeablereduceleastRESULTS:Across73enrolled51completedanalysesmodifiedintent-to-treatn=48whereasanalysisconsentedparticipantsgainperdaydecreased2Seventy-onepercentexperiencedreductionvolumequalitylifescoresimprovedposttreatment35pointstotal40recordedwithdrewdueCONCLUSIONS:self-deployableevaluatedalternativeoptionseekingmethodmanagesymptomsstudiesrequiredlong-termeffectscomplianceSafetyDisposableVaginalDeviceStressUrinaryIncontinence

Similar Articles

Cited By