Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: an analysis of the risk perception.

Marco A Amaral, Marco A Javarone
Author Information
  1. Marco A Amaral: Instituto de Humanidades, Artes e Ciências, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia 45988, Brazil.
  2. Marco A Javarone: Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, UK. ORCID

Abstract

In this study, we analyse the relationship between heterogeneity and cooperation. Previous investigations suggest that this relation is non-trivial, as some authors found that heterogeneity sustains cooperation, while others obtained different results. Among the possible forms of heterogeneity, we focus on the individual perception of risks and rewards related to a generic event, which can appear in a number of social and biological systems. The modelling approach is based on the framework of evolutionary game theory. To represent this kind of heterogeneity, we implement small and local perturbations on the pay-off matrix of simple two-strategy games, such as the Prisoner's Dilemma. So, while usually the pay-off is considered to be a global and time-invariant structure, i.e. it is the same for all individuals of a population at any time, in our model its value is continuously affected by small variations, in both time and space (i.e. position on a lattice). We found that such perturbations can be beneficial or detrimental to cooperation, depending on their setting. Notably, cooperation is strongly supported when perturbations act on the main diagonal of the pay-off matrix, whereas when they act on the off-diagonal the resulting effect is more difficult to quantify. To conclude, the proposed model shows a rich spectrum of possible equilibria, whose interpretation might offer insights and enrich the description of several systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3490-4 [PMID: 16484371]
  2. Phys Rev Lett. 2018 Feb 2;120(5):058101 [PMID: 29481174]
  3. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Oct;76(4 Pt 1):041130 [PMID: 17994959]
  4. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Oct;72(4 Pt 2):047107 [PMID: 16383580]
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Jun;73(6 Pt 2):067103 [PMID: 16907030]
  6. Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Mar 9;98(10):108103 [PMID: 17358570]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 17;106(11):4138-42 [PMID: 19255433]
  8. Nature. 2008 Jul 10;454(7201):213-6 [PMID: 18615084]
  9. Phys Rev E. 2018 Apr;97(4-1):042305 [PMID: 29758674]
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Sep;90(3):032813 [PMID: 25314488]
  11. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12575 [PMID: 31467364]
  12. Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Apr 18;112(15):158701 [PMID: 24785078]
  13. Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Jun;81(4):264-72 [PMID: 22406614]
  14. Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 4;11(1):702 [PMID: 32019930]
  15. Theor Popul Biol. 2013 Jun;86:1-11 [PMID: 23474219]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 17;116(51):25398-25404 [PMID: 31772008]
  17. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187960 [PMID: 29136020]
  18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):413-25 [PMID: 23856025]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 7;109(32):12922-6 [PMID: 22773811]
  20. Sci Rep. 2017 May 11;7(1):1781 [PMID: 28496113]
  21. Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7713):246-249 [PMID: 29973718]
  22. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Jun;79(6 Pt 2):067101 [PMID: 19658626]
  23. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 12;9(1):16549 [PMID: 31719644]
  24. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Jan;77(1 Pt 1):011904 [PMID: 18351873]
  25. Phys Rev E. 2016 Apr;93:042304 [PMID: 27176309]
  26. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0120317 [PMID: 25781345]
  27. Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12 [PMID: 10521342]
  28. J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:88-96 [PMID: 21930134]
  29. Biosystems. 2010 Feb;99(2):109-25 [PMID: 19837129]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0heterogeneitycooperationperceptionperturbationspay-offfoundpossiblecansystemsevolutionarysmallmatrixietimemodelactriskstudyanalyserelationshipPreviousinvestigationssuggestrelationnon-trivialauthorssustainsothersobtaineddifferentresultsAmongformsfocusindividualrisksrewardsrelatedgenericeventappearnumbersocialbiologicalmodellingapproachbasedframeworkgametheoryrepresentkindimplementlocalsimpletwo-strategygamesPrisoner'sDilemmausuallyconsideredglobaltime-invariantstructureindividualspopulationvaluecontinuouslyaffectedvariationsspacepositionlatticebeneficialdetrimentaldependingsettingNotablystronglysupportedmaindiagonalwhereasoff-diagonalresultingeffectdifficultquantifyconcludeproposedshowsrichspectrumequilibriawhoseinterpretationmightofferinsightsenrichdescriptionseveralHeterogeneitygames:analysisevolution

Similar Articles

Cited By