Somatosensory-visual effects in visual biological motion perception.

Pierre Progin, Nathan Faivre, Anna Brooks, Wenwen Chang, Manuel Mercier, Lars Schwabe, Kim Q Do, Olaf Blanke
Author Information
  1. Pierre Progin: Department of Psychiatry, Service of General Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Nathan Faivre: Department of Psychiatry, Service of General Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. ORCID
  3. Anna Brooks: Lifeline Research Foundation, Lifeline Australia, Deakin ACT, Australia.
  4. Wenwen Chang: Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  5. Manuel Mercier: Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (INS), Inserm (U1106), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
  6. Lars Schwabe: Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain, Lufthansa Industry Solutions AS, Norderstedt, Germany.
  7. Kim Q Do: Department of Psychiatry, Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  8. Olaf Blanke: Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, Faculty of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

Social cognition is dependent on the ability to extract information from human stimuli. Of those, patterns of biological motion (BM) and in particular walking patterns of other humans, are prime examples. Although most often tested in isolation, BM outside the laboratory is often associated with multisensory cues (i.e. we often hear and see someone walking) and there is evidence that vision-based judgments of BM stimuli are systematically influenced by motor signals. Furthermore, cross-modal visuo-tactile mechanisms have been shown to influence perception of bodily stimuli. Based on these observations, we here investigated if somatosensory inputs would affect visual BM perception. In two experiments, we asked healthy participants to perform a speed discrimination task on two point light walkers (PLW) presented one after the other. In the first experiment, we quantified somatosensory-visual interactions by presenting PLW together with tactile stimuli either on the participants' forearms or feet soles. In the second experiment, we assessed the specificity of these interactions by presenting tactile stimuli either synchronously or asynchronously with upright or inverted PLW. Our results confirm that somatosensory input in the form of tactile foot stimulation influences visual BM perception. When presented with a seen walker's footsteps, additional tactile cues enhanced sensitivity on a speed discrimination task, but only if the tactile stimuli were presented on the relevant body-part (under the feet) and when the tactile stimuli were presented synchronously with the seen footsteps of the PLW, whether upright or inverted. Based on these findings we discuss potential mechanisms of somatosensory-visual interactions in BM perception.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Apr;21(2):334-43 [PMID: 7714475]
  2. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb;31(1):210-220 [PMID: 15709874]
  3. Neuroimage. 2008 Jul 1;41(3):1011-20 [PMID: 18440831]
  4. Cereb Cortex. 2008 Feb;18(2):254-61 [PMID: 17490989]
  5. Neuropsychology. 2016 Sep;30(6):720-30 [PMID: 26949927]
  6. Science. 2007 Aug 24;317(5841):1096-9 [PMID: 17717189]
  7. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1143-58 [PMID: 15453970]
  8. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  9. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:47-73 [PMID: 16903802]
  10. Perception. 1996;25(6):727-38 [PMID: 8888304]
  11. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):373-82 [PMID: 19396433]
  12. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):215-24 [PMID: 20356569]
  13. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jun;9(6):738-9 [PMID: 16715080]
  14. Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jul;62(5):889-99 [PMID: 10997036]
  15. Percept Psychophys. 1988 Oct;44(4):339-47 [PMID: 3226881]
  16. Perception. 1984;13(3):283-6 [PMID: 6514513]
  17. Front Psychol. 2011 Feb 02;2:16 [PMID: 21713180]
  18. J Neurosci. 1987 Oct;7(10):3215-29 [PMID: 3668625]
  19. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):454-9 [PMID: 11229988]
  20. J Vis. 2009 Apr 30;9(4):25.1-7 [PMID: 19757934]
  21. Nat Neurosci. 2004 May;7(5):422-3 [PMID: 15114350]
  22. PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10564 [PMID: 20485681]
  23. Cognition. 2001 Dec;82(2):B51-61 [PMID: 11716834]
  24. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):224-36 [PMID: 19376156]
  25. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1256-60 [PMID: 20601707]
  26. Cereb Cortex. 2017 Nov 1;27(11):5318-5330 [PMID: 28981613]
  27. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Aug;2(8):561-7 [PMID: 11483999]
  28. J Vis. 2006 Jul 28;6(8):850-7 [PMID: 16895463]
  29. Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):467-72 [PMID: 11760133]
  30. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):523-30 [PMID: 16504220]
  31. Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;1(3):184-92 [PMID: 24168334]
  32. Percept Psychophys. 2003 Nov;65(8):1188-96 [PMID: 14710954]
  33. PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e79 [PMID: 15736981]
  34. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Mar;22(3):413-26 [PMID: 19302003]
  35. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;2(1):68-78 [PMID: 26301914]
  36. Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 18;16(8):821-4 [PMID: 16631591]
  37. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Sep 1;15(6-8):535-52 [PMID: 22448837]

MeSH Term

Adult
Female
Humans
Judgment
Male
Motion Perception
Photic Stimulation
Physical Stimulation
Touch Perception
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stimuliBMtactileperceptionPLWpresentedoftenvisualinteractionspatternsbiologicalmotionwalkingcuesmechanismsBasedsomatosensorytwospeeddiscriminationtaskexperimentsomatosensory-visualpresentingeitherfeetsynchronouslyuprightinvertedseenfootstepsSocialcognitiondependentabilityextractinformationhumanparticularhumansprimeexamplesAlthoughtestedisolationoutsidelaboratoryassociatedmultisensoryiehearseesomeoneevidencevision-basedjudgmentssystematicallyinfluencedmotorsignalsFurthermorecross-modalvisuo-tactileshowninfluencebodilyobservationsinvestigatedinputsaffectexperimentsaskedhealthyparticipantsperformpointlightwalkersonefirstquantifiedtogetherparticipants'forearmssolessecondassessedspecificityasynchronouslyresultsconfirminputformfootstimulationinfluenceswalker'sadditionalenhancedsensitivityrelevantbody-partwhetherfindingsdiscusspotentialSomatosensory-visualeffects

Similar Articles

Cited By