Machine learning for high-throughput field phenotyping and image processing provides insight into the association of above and below-ground traits in cassava ( Crantz).

Michael Gomez Selvaraj, Manuel Valderrama, Diego Guzman, Milton Valencia, Henry Ruiz, Animesh Acharjee
Author Information
  1. Michael Gomez Selvaraj: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713 Cali, Colombia. ORCID
  2. Manuel Valderrama: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713 Cali, Colombia.
  3. Diego Guzman: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713 Cali, Colombia.
  4. Milton Valencia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713 Cali, Colombia.
  5. Henry Ruiz: Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX USA.
  6. Animesh Acharjee: College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid non-destructive measurements to predict cassava root yield over the full growing season through large numbers of germplasm and multiple environments is a huge challenge in Cassava breeding programs. As opposed to waiting until the harvest season, multispectral imagery using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) are capable of measuring the canopy metrics and vegetation indices (VIs) traits at different time points of the growth cycle. This resourceful time series aerial image processing with appropriate analytical framework is very important for the automatic extraction of phenotypic features from the image data. Many studies have demonstrated the usefulness of advanced remote sensing technologies coupled with machine learning (ML) approaches for accurate prediction of valuable crop traits. Until now, Cassava has received little to no attention in aerial image-based phenotyping and ML model testing.
RESULTS: To accelerate image processing, an automated image-analysis framework called CIAT Pheno-i was developed to extract plot level vegetation indices/canopy metrics. Multiple linear regression models were constructed at different key growth stages of cassava, using ground-truth data and vegetation indices obtained from a multispectral sensor. Henceforth, the spectral indices/features were combined to develop models and predict cassava root yield using different Machine learning techniques. Our results showed that (1) Developed CIAT pheno-i image analysis framework was found to be easier and more rapid than manual methods. (2) The correlation analysis of four phenological stages of cassava revealed that elongation (EL) and late bulking (LBK) were the most useful stages to estimate above-ground biomass (AGB), below-ground biomass (BGB) and canopy height (CH). (3) The multi-temporal analysis revealed that cumulative image feature information of EL + early bulky (EBK) stages showed a higher significant correlation ( = 0.77) for Green Normalized Difference Vegetation indices (GNDVI) with BGB than individual time points. Canopy height measured on the ground correlated well with UAV (CHuav)-based measurements ( = 0.92) at late bulking (LBK) stage. Among different image features, normalized difference red edge index (NDRE) data were found to be consistently highly correlated ( = 0.65 to 0.84) with AGB at LBK stage. (4) Among the four ML algorithms used in this study, k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) showed the best performance for root yield prediction with the highest accuracy of R = 0.67, 0.66 and 0.64, respectively.
CONCLUSION: UAV platforms, time series image acquisition, automated image analytical framework (CIAT Pheno-i), and key vegetation indices (VIs) to estimate phenotyping traits and root yield described in this work have great potential for use as a selection tool in the modern cassava breeding programs around the world to accelerate germplasm and varietal selection. The image analysis software (CIAT Pheno-i) developed from this study can be widely applicable to any other crop to extract phenotypic information rapidly.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Aug 29;7:1227 [PMID: 27621734]
  2. Plant J. 2017 Apr;90(1):204-216 [PMID: 28066963]
  3. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 24;10:449 [PMID: 31105715]
  4. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 26;10:1516 [PMID: 31850020]
  5. Plant Methods. 2019 Mar 27;15:32 [PMID: 30972143]
  6. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0205083 [PMID: 30811435]
  7. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Feb 27;10:204 [PMID: 30873194]
  8. Front Physiol. 2013 May 10;4:93 [PMID: 23717282]
  9. Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 18;15:138 [PMID: 31832080]
  10. Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):52-61 [PMID: 24139902]
  11. New Phytol. 2018 Jul;219(2):808-823 [PMID: 29621393]
  12. Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 09;15:131 [PMID: 31728153]
  13. Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 07;10:554 [PMID: 31134110]
  14. Breed Sci. 2020 Apr;70(2):145-166 [PMID: 32523397]
  15. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 03;10:394 [PMID: 31019521]
  16. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 09;11(9):e0162219 [PMID: 27611577]
  17. Plant Methods. 2019 Nov 01;15:123 [PMID: 31695728]
  18. Plant Methods. 2018 Oct 03;14:86 [PMID: 30305840]
  19. Plant Methods. 2017 Aug 7;13:65 [PMID: 28794795]
  20. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:267-91 [PMID: 23451789]
  21. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jun 03;10:714 [PMID: 31214228]
  22. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 30;19(9): [PMID: 31052251]
  23. Plant Sci. 2019 May;282:2-10 [PMID: 31003608]
  24. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 18;17(6): [PMID: 28629159]
  25. Plant Methods. 2015 Jun 24;11:35 [PMID: 26106438]
  26. Plant Methods. 2016 Jun 24;12:35 [PMID: 27347001]
  27. Plant Methods. 2017 Apr 8;13:23 [PMID: 28405214]
  28. PLoS One. 2018 May 1;13(5):e0196605 [PMID: 29715311]
  29. Plant Methods. 2017 Oct 30;13:90 [PMID: 29093742]
  30. New Phytol. 2019 Sep;223(4):1714-1727 [PMID: 30937909]
  31. Plant Sci. 2019 May;282:95-103 [PMID: 31003615]
  32. Plant Methods. 2019 Feb 04;15:10 [PMID: 30740136]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0imagecassavayieldrootaerialUAVvegetationindicestraitsdifferenttimeprocessingframeworklearningCIATstagesMachineanalysisCassavausingdataMLpredictionphenotypingPheno-ishowedLBKbiomass = 00measurementspredictseasongermplasmbreedingprogramsmultispectralimagerycanopymetricsVIspointsgrowthseriesanalyticalphenotypicfeaturescropaccelerateautomateddevelopedextractmodelskeyfoundcorrelationfourrevealedlatebulkingestimateAGBbelow-groundBGBheightinformationcorrelatedstageAmongstudyselectionBACKGROUND:Rapidnon-destructivefullgrowinglargenumbersmultipleenvironmentshugechallengeopposedwaitingharvestunmannedvehiclescapablemeasuringcycleresourcefulappropriateimportantautomaticextractionManystudiesdemonstratedusefulnessadvancedremotesensingtechnologiescoupledmachineapproachesaccuratevaluablenowreceivedlittleattentionimage-basedmodeltestingRESULTS:image-analysiscalledplotlevelindices/canopyMultiplelinearregressionconstructedground-truthobtainedsensorHenceforthspectralindices/featurescombineddeveloptechniquesresults1Developedpheno-ieasierrapidmanualmethods2phenologicalelongationELusefulabove-groundCH3multi-temporalcumulativefeatureEL + earlybulkyEBKhighersignificant77GreenNormalizedDifferenceVegetationGNDVIindividualCanopymeasuredgroundwellCHuav-based92normalizeddifferencerededgeindexNDREconsistentlyhighly65844algorithmsusedk-NearestNeighbourskNNRandomForestRFSupportVectorSVMbestperformancehighestaccuracyR = 0676664respectivelyCONCLUSION:platformsacquisitiondescribedworkgreatpotentialusetoolmodernaroundworldvarietalsoftwarecanwidelyapplicablerapidlyhigh-throughputfieldprovidesinsightassociationCrantzAbove-groundAutomatedMultispectralRoot

Similar Articles

Cited By