Reducing hospital mortality: Incremental change informed by structured mortality review is effective.

Divya Tiwari, Alyson O'Donnell, Richard Renaut, Tristan Richardson, Stephen Allen
Author Information
  1. Divya Tiwari: The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK and Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
  2. Alyson O'Donnell: The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
  3. Richard Renaut: The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.
  4. Tristan Richardson: Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
  5. Stephen Allen: The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK and Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.

Abstract

Hospital mortality rates have frequently been improved by identifying diagnostic groups with high mortality and targeting interventions to those specific groups. We found that high residual inpatient mortality persisted after targeted measures had achieved an initial reduction, and that the causes were spread across a wide range of diagnostic groups. Further interventions were put in place consisting of a structured electronic mortality form and systematised mortality scrutiny and reporting (primary intervention) accompanied by a number of quality improvement interventions arising from the mortality analysis (secondary interventions). We found that those interventions were associated with progressive improvements in mortality rates and average lengths of inpatient stay over the 5-year study period. Winter quarter mortality improvements reached a high level of statistical significance but could not be attributed to changes in any particular diagnostic groups. We conclude that progress with mortality improvements is probably best achieved by applying both code-targeted and general interventions simultaneously.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Nov;15(11):663-664 [PMID: 31506607]
  2. PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 24;11(6):e1001667 [PMID: 24959751]
  3. J R Soc Med. 2006 Jun;99(6):303-8 [PMID: 16738373]
  4. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1858 Apr;21(42):424-443 [PMID: 30164479]
  5. BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1234 [PMID: 20360220]
  6. Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1741-61 [PMID: 21790587]
  7. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Sep;39(9):387-95 [PMID: 24147350]
  8. BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1515-20 [PMID: 10356004]
  9. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Nov;42(11):516-527 [PMID: 28266920]
  10. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21(12):1052-6 [PMID: 23069860]
  11. Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1882-90 [PMID: 24415623]
  12. BMJ. 2010 Jan 21;342:c7116 [PMID: 21257655]
  13. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):84-9 [PMID: 17403750]
  14. J Healthc Qual. 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):29-36 [PMID: 22530618]
  15. BMJ. 2015 Jul 14;351:h3239 [PMID: 26174149]
  16. Evid Based Nurs. 2001 Jul;4(3):68-9 [PMID: 11708232]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mortalityinterventionsdiagnosticgroupshighimprovementsHospitalratesfoundinpatientachievedstructuredqualityimprovementfrequentlyimprovedidentifyingtargetingspecificresidualpersistedtargetedmeasuresinitialreductioncausesspreadacrosswiderangeputplaceconsistingelectronicformsystematisedscrutinyreportingprimaryinterventionaccompaniednumberarisinganalysissecondaryassociatedprogressiveaveragelengthsstay5-yearstudyperiodWinterquarterreachedlevelstatisticalsignificanceattributedchangesparticularconcludeprogressprobablybestapplyingcode-targetedgeneralsimultaneouslyReducinghospitalmortality:Incrementalchangeinformedrevieweffectiveratioscodes

Similar Articles

Cited By