Understanding the Barriers and Opportunities for Effective Management of Shared Sanitation in Low-Income Settlements-The Case of Kumasi, Ghana.

Prince Antwi-Agyei, Bismark Dwumfour-Asare, Kwaku Amaning Adjei, Raphael Kweyu, Sheillah Simiyu
Author Information
  1. Prince Antwi-Agyei: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Energy and Natural Resources (UENR), Regional Centre of Energy and Environmental Sustainability (RCEES), P.O. Box 214, Sunyani BS0061, Ghana.
  2. Bismark Dwumfour-Asare: Department of Environmental Health & Sanitation Education, University of Education Winneba, Asante-Mampong Campus, P. O. Box 40, Asante-Mampong AM0013, Ghana.
  3. Kwaku Amaning Adjei: Department of Civil Engineering, Regional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre (RWESCK), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB, University Post Office, Kumasi AK448, Ghana.
  4. Raphael Kweyu: Department of Geography, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
  5. Sheillah Simiyu: Urbanisation and Well-being Unit, African Population & Health Research Center, P.O Box 10787, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.

Abstract

Improved sanitation for all is a daunting task for low-income countries, and shared toilets often provide an alternative to private household sanitation for most urban residents. This study sought to provide better understanding of the existing barriers and opportunities for improved management of shared sanitation. The study used focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with 70 users (landlords and tenants) of shared sanitation in Kumasi, Ghana to assess barriers and opportunities of "high-quality" shared sanitation. The commonly used toilet facilities were dry toilets-Kumasi Ventilated Improved Pit latrine and Ventilated Improved Pit latrines; and flush systems-water closet and pour flush connected to septic tanks. Between 2 and 21 households, or 4 and 84 people, shared one facility. Participants' description of "high-quality" (Ideal) shared sanitation was centred on cleanliness, user behaviour, smell, and user crowding. They also identified challenges of shared sanitation as overcrowded users, poor user behaviours, conflicts among users, and high cost associated with frequent desludging. However, opportunities for improvement included users' preference for shared toilets due to enjoyed benefits, existing facility management practices, and mutual understanding among users (tenants and landlords). Interventions and policy guidelines to influence behaviour change of shared sanitation users are proposed and are intended to be delivered by local government and users.

Keywords

References

  1. Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):1000-1011 [PMID: 28556458]
  2. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Nov;109(11):690-9 [PMID: 26464231]
  3. Int J Environ Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(6):609-625 [PMID: 30027750]
  4. Environ Health Insights. 2011;5:63-70 [PMID: 22084575]
  5. BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;14:1260 [PMID: 25494556]
  6. Int J Audiol. 2016 Jul;55 Suppl 3:S90-8 [PMID: 27420547]
  7. Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 15;12(1):114 [PMID: 28915815]
  8. BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 13;11(1):473 [PMID: 30005694]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):68 [PMID: 28077103]
  10. Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jul 1;93(7):509-10 [PMID: 26170511]
  11. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 17;9(4):e93300 [PMID: 24743336]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Aug;9(8):2772-87 [PMID: 23066396]
  13. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Oct 1;96(10):723-725 [PMID: 30455520]
  14. Int J Environ Health Res. 2017 Oct;27(5):377-393 [PMID: 28705015]
  15. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Aug;93(2):263-8 [PMID: 26123953]
  16. Public Health. 2018 Dec;165:125-135 [PMID: 30390425]
  17. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):30 [PMID: 30045729]
  18. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016 May;110(5):265-7 [PMID: 27198209]
  19. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):965 [PMID: 30547793]
  20. BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 19;14:1180 [PMID: 25407788]
  21. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42 [PMID: 21513547]
  22. BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 18;16:594 [PMID: 27430737]
  23. J Infect Prev. 2016 Mar;17(2):74-78 [PMID: 28989457]

MeSH Term

Adult
Cooperative Behavior
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family Characteristics
Female
Focus Groups
Ghana
Health Promotion
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Poverty Areas
Qualitative Research
Sanitation
Toilet Facilities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sharedsanitationusersImprovedopportunitiesGhanauserbehaviourtoiletsprovidestudyunderstandingexistingbarriersmanagementusedlandlordstenantsKumasi"high-quality"toiletVentilatedPitflushfacilityamongchangeBarriersdauntingtasklow-incomecountriesoftenalternativeprivatehouseholdurbanresidentssoughtbetterimprovedfocusgroupdiscussionsin-depthinterviews70assesscommonlyfacilitiesdrytoilets-Kumasilatrinelatrinessystems-waterclosetpourconnectedseptictanks221households484peopleoneParticipants'descriptionIdealcentredcleanlinesssmellcrowdingalsoidentifiedchallengesovercrowdedpoorbehavioursconflictshighcostassociatedfrequentdesludgingHoweverimprovementincludedusers'preferencedueenjoyedbenefitspracticesmutualInterventionspolicyguidelinesinfluenceproposedintendeddeliveredlocalgovernmentUnderstandingOpportunitiesEffectiveManagementSharedSanitationLow-IncomeSettlements-TheCaseO&Mcompound

Similar Articles

Cited By