The Latest Evolution in Virtual Surgical Planning: Customized Reconstruction Plates in Free Fibula Flap Mandibular Reconstruction.
Z-Hye Lee, Allyson R Alfonso, Elie P Ramly, Rami S Kantar, Jason W Yu, David Daar, David L Hirsch, Adam Jacobson, Jamie P Levine
Author Information
Z-Hye Lee: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
Allyson R Alfonso: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
Elie P Ramly: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
Rami S Kantar: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
Jason W Yu: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
David Daar: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
David L Hirsch: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
Adam Jacobson: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
Jamie P Levine: From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Health; and Manhattan Maxillofacial Surgery.
BACKGROUND: Virtual surgical planning has contributed to technical advancements in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction. The authors present the largest comparative study on the latest modification of this technology: the use of patient-specific, preoperatively customized reconstruction plates for fixation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with virtually planned free fibula flaps at a single institution between 2008 and 2018. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. Reconstructions using traditional fixation methods were compared to those using prefabricated, patient-specific reconstruction plates. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (mean age, 48.5 ± 20.3 years; 61.1 percent male) underwent mandibular reconstruction with a free fibula flap. Mean follow-up time was 23.5 months. A customized plate was used in 43.7 percent of cases. Reconstructions with patient-specific plates had significantly shorter total operative times compared with noncustomized fixation methods (643.0 minutes versus 741.7 minutes; p = 0.001). Hardware complications occurred in 11.1 percent of patients, with a trend toward a lower rate in the customized plate group (5.5 percent versus 15.5 percent; p = 0.091). Multivariate regression showed that the use of customized plates was a significant independent predictor of fewer overall complications (p = 0.03), shorter operative time (p = 0.014), and shorter length of stay (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to traditional fixation methods, patient-specific plates are associated with fewer complications, shorter operative times, and reduced length of stay. The use of customized reconstruction plates increases efficiency and represents the latest technological innovation in mandibular reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
References
Patel A, Otterburn D, Saadeh P, Levine J, Hirsch DL. 3D volume assessment techniques and computer-aided design and manufacturing for preoperative fabrication of implants in head and neck reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011;19:683–709, ix.
Avraham T, Franco P, Brecht LE, et al. Functional outcomes of virtually planned free fibula flap reconstruction of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:628e–634e.
Cornelius CP, Smolka W, Giessler GA, Wilde F, Probst FA. Patient-specific reconstruction plates are the missing link in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: A showcase for technical description. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:624–629.
Wilde F, Hanken H, Probst F, Schramm A, Heiland M, Cornelius CP. Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10:2035–2051.
Rana M, Chin SJ, Muecke T, et al. Increasing the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps using functionalized selective laser-melted patient-specific implants: A retrospective multicenter analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:1212–1219.
Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: A new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:71–79.
Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic improvements in free-flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88:574–585; discussion 586–587.
Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Saddeh PB, Levine JP. Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: A paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2115–2122.
Levine JP, Patel A, Saadeh PB, Hirsch DL. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: The new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:288–293.
Levine JP, Bae JS, Soares M, et al. Jaw in a day: Total maxillofacial reconstruction using digital technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1386–1391.
Dérand P, Hirsch JM. Virtual bending of mandibular reconstruction plates using a computer-aided design. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1640–1643.
Wilde F, Cornelius CP, Schramm A. Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a patient-specific reconstruction plate fabricated with computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;7:158–166.
Rodby KA, Turin S, Jacobs RJ, et al. Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: Systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1171–1185.
Toto JM, Chang EI, Agag R, Devarajan K, Patel SA, Topham NS. Improved operative efficiency of free fibula flap mandible reconstruction with patient-specific, computer-guided preoperative planning. Head Neck. 2015;37:1660–1664.
Broer PN, Weichman KE, Tanna N, et al. Venous coupler size in autologous breast reconstruction: Does it matter? Microsurgery. 2013;33:514–518.
Hanson SE, Mitchell MB, Palivela N, et al. Smaller diameter anastomotic coupling devices have higher rates of venous thrombosis in microvascular free tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1293–1300.
Chang EI, Jenkins MP, Patel SA, Topham NS. Long-term operative outcomes of preoperative computed tomography-guided virtual surgical planning for osteocutaneous free flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:619–623.
Bouchet B, Raoul G, Julieron B, Wojcik T. Functional and morphologic outcomes of CAD/CAM-assisted versus conventional microvascular fibular free flap reconstruction of the mandible: A retrospective study of 25 cases. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;119:455–460.
Sumi Y, Hasegawa T, Miyaishi O, Ueda M. Interface analysis of titanium implants in a human vascularized fibula bone graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:213–216.
Efanov JI, Roy AA, Huang KN, Borsuk DE. Virtual surgical planning: The pearls and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6:e1443.
