Prospective Short-Term and Return-to-Sports Results of a Novel Uncemented Short-Stem Hip Prosthesis with Metaphyseal Anchorage.

Robert Breuer, Rainer Fiala, Nina Schrenk, Thomas M Tiefenboeck
Author Information
  1. Robert Breuer: Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  2. Rainer Fiala: Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Ost, 1220 Vienna, Austria.
  3. Nina Schrenk: Department of Orthopedics, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, 4600 Wels, Austria.
  4. Thomas M Tiefenboeck: Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. ORCID

Abstract

Short-stem hip prostheses were developed to treat active patients requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study provides short-term data about a short-stem total hip arthroplasty system. Functional and radiological outcomes as well as return to sports and activity level were assessed. A series of 55 patients was primarily included. Data were available for 47 patients at an average follow-up of 38 ± 4.6 months. The back-to-sports analysis showed a 98% return-to-sports rate (46/47 patients). The average time for return to sports was 13 weeks (± 8) postoperatively. Five patients (10.6%) were more active postoperatively. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 34.8 (±9.4) preoperatively to 94.7 (±8.4, 0.001) and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score improved from 4.5 (±1.8) to 6.9 (±1.9) ( 0.001). The High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) was 12 (± 3.6) at 3-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative UCLA and postoperative HHS and HAAS scores had a positive influence on the return-to-sports rate ( 0.05). The collection of radiographic data during all postoperative follow-ups showed no signs of radiolucent lines or bone fissures. The complication rate was at 5%. Short-stem systems are equaling conventional prostheses and offer benefits regarding soft tissue and bone stock preservation. Fast recovery and return to sports can be achieved.

Keywords

References

  1. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6):646-651 [PMID: 31154834]
  2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 14;20(1):77 [PMID: 30764879]
  3. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Feb;28(2):269-275 [PMID: 29030711]
  4. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1634-8 [PMID: 23523485]
  5. Hip Int. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):195-200 [PMID: 19795360]
  6. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Jun;44(3):457-469 [PMID: 29344706]
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3060-6 [PMID: 22535588]
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):112-8 [PMID: 18830670]
  9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Nov;130(11):1349-54 [PMID: 20069429]
  10. Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Nov;29(6):451-458 [PMID: 31688174]
  11. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 16;6(4):2325967118763920 [PMID: 29707594]
  12. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Aug;82(2):372-375 [PMID: 27682302]
  13. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Mar 22;11:33 [PMID: 27005904]
  14. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):620-33 [PMID: 21251989]
  15. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(43):e5215 [PMID: 27787383]
  16. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 May;26(5):550-6 [PMID: 26041645]
  17. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):992-995 [PMID: 27866949]
  18. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Dec;19(3):284-7 [PMID: 22184155]
  19. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Feb;66(2):277-84 [PMID: 23925916]
  20. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr;87(4):701-10 [PMID: 15805196]
  21. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):1009-14 [PMID: 24287128]
  22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):971-81 [PMID: 26620966]
  23. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):131-7 [PMID: 24114754]
  24. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):958-65 [PMID: 18587624]
  25. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):268-73 [PMID: 19056232]
  26. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69 Suppl 1:S68-76 [PMID: 22035489]
  27. Anesthesiology. 1974 Dec;41(6):609-12 [PMID: 4433062]
  28. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):425-32 [PMID: 21993977]
  29. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(6):659-66 [PMID: 26134386]
  30. Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1347-1353 [PMID: 27942850]
  31. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Oct;26(5):637-47 [PMID: 23218428]
  32. Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1673-82 [PMID: 25813458]
  33. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3421-3428 [PMID: 28662957]
  34. Orthopedics. 2014 Apr;37(4):257-65 [PMID: 24762833]
  35. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8):1518-1525.e2 [PMID: 22516106]
  36. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):883-890 [PMID: 27687805]
  37. Hip Pelvis. 2016 Jun;28(2):82-9 [PMID: 27536649]
  38. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Apr;23(1):90-4 [PMID: 25920653]
  39. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):120-6 [PMID: 19698910]
  40. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Aug;471(8):2595-601 [PMID: 23564363]
  41. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55 [PMID: 5783851]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientshipreturnsports4totalarthroplasty±6rate80postoperativeboneShort-stemprosthesesactivedataactivityaveragefollow-upshowedreturn-to-sportspostoperativelyHipScoreHHSimproved001UCLA±19HAASstockpreservationdevelopedtreatrequiringTHAstudyprovidesshort-termshort-stemsystemFunctionalradiologicaloutcomeswelllevelassessedseries55primarilyincludedDataavailable4738monthsback-to-sportsanalysis98%46/47time13weeksFive106%Harris34±9preoperatively947±8UniversityCaliforniaLosAngelesscore5HighActivityArthroplasty1233-yearPre-scorespositiveinfluence05collectionradiographicfollow-upssignsradiolucentlinesfissurescomplication5%systemsequalingconventionalofferbenefitsregardingsofttissueFastrecoverycanachievedProspectiveShort-TermReturn-to-SportsResultsNovelUncementedShort-StemProsthesisMetaphysealAnchorageminimallyinvasivephysicalshortstem

Similar Articles

Cited By