A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits.

Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold, Lyan H Rodijk, Edith J Liemburg, Grigory Sidorenkov, H Marike Boezen, Richard Bruggeman, Behrooz Z Alizadeh
Author Information
  1. Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold: Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. tesfadej2003@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Lyan H Rodijk: Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  3. Edith J Liemburg: Department of Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  4. Grigory Sidorenkov: Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  5. H Marike Boezen: Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  6. Richard Bruggeman: Department of Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  7. Behrooz Z Alizadeh: Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. b.z.alizadeh@umcg.nl. ORCID

Abstract

To tackle the phenotypic heterogeneity of schizophrenia, data-driven methods are often applied to identify subtypes of its symptoms and cognitive deficits. However, a systematic review on this topic is lacking. The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence obtained from longitudinal and cross-sectional data-driven studies in positive and negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls or individuals from general population. Additionally, we aimed to highlight methodological gaps across studies and point out future directions to optimize the translatability of evidence from data-driven studies. A systematic review was performed through searching PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycTESTS, PsycARTICLES, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies published from 2008 to 2019, which reported at least two statistically derived clusters or trajectories were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. In this review, 53 studies (19 longitudinal and 34 cross-sectional) that conducted among 17,822 patients, 8729 unaffected siblings and 5520 controls or general population were included. Most longitudinal studies found four trajectories that characterized by stability, progressive deterioration, relapsing and progressive amelioration of symptoms and cognitive function. Cross-sectional studies commonly identified three clusters with low, intermediate (mixed) and high psychotic symptoms and cognitive profiles. Moreover, identified subgroups were predicted by numerous genetic, sociodemographic and clinical factors. Our findings indicate that schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits are heterogeneous, although methodological limitations across studies are observed. Identified clusters and trajectories along with their predictors may be used to base the implementation of personalized treatment and develop a risk prediction model for high-risk individuals with prodromal symptoms.

References

  1. Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):86-97 [PMID: 26777917]
  2. Schizophr Res. 2020 Jun;220:85-91 [PMID: 32278539]
  3. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Oct;204(10):770-777 [PMID: 27434193]
  4. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):591-604 [PMID: 30242827]
  5. Schizophr Res. 2020 Sep;223:135-147 [PMID: 32631699]
  6. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:707-718 [PMID: 30273896]
  7. Schizophr Res. 2018 Dec;202:91-98 [PMID: 30042029]
  8. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2014 Feb 07;10:1-8 [PMID: 24600479]
  9. Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:173-181 [PMID: 28648915]
  10. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009 Sep;19(3):365-84 [PMID: 19639412]
  11. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Nov 30;19(12): [PMID: 30513630]
  12. Schizophr Res. 2012 May;137(1-3):141-6 [PMID: 22316567]
  13. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 1;177(4):298-307 [PMID: 31838871]
  14. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):179-94 [PMID: 16166612]
  15. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6 [PMID: 18436948]
  16. Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):26-33 [PMID: 20085855]
  17. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Mar 30;226(1):204-10 [PMID: 25619435]
  18. Psychol Med. 2014 Nov;44(15):3239-48 [PMID: 25066202]
  19. Genes Brain Behav. 2009 Nov;8(8):785-94 [PMID: 19694819]
  20. Schizophr Res. 2015 Oct;168(1-2):84-91 [PMID: 26265299]
  21. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;9(1):59-71 [PMID: 26173241]
  22. Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Aug 08;16:248-256 [PMID: 28831376]
  23. Schizophr Res. 2009 May;110(1-3):165-72 [PMID: 19230622]
  24. Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:71-77 [PMID: 29146021]
  25. Schizophr Res. 2016 Jul;174(1-3):165-171 [PMID: 27131912]
  26. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;264(4):333-43 [PMID: 24173295]
  27. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;192(4):248-57 [PMID: 18378982]
  28. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Aug;198(8):580-5 [PMID: 20699724]
  29. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30 [PMID: 21603045]
  30. Biol Res Nurs. 2017 Oct;19(5):559-575 [PMID: 28691507]
  31. NPJ Schizophr. 2015 Nov 04;1:15043 [PMID: 27336046]
  32. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jun;47(6):783-90 [PMID: 23453820]
  33. Schizophr Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):32-43 [PMID: 27872259]
  34. Psychol Med. 2011 Jun;41(6):1291-300 [PMID: 20925971]
  35. Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:446-448 [PMID: 31676173]
  36. Schizophr Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):102-11 [PMID: 21765165]
  37. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Feb;97:8-15 [PMID: 29156414]
  38. Schizophr Res. 2008 Aug;103(1-3):324-5 [PMID: 18550340]
  39. Neuropsychology. 2009 May;23(3):315-36 [PMID: 19413446]
  40. BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 28;13:320 [PMID: 24283222]
  41. Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 15;44(suppl_2):S536-S546 [PMID: 29618094]
  42. Schizophr Bull. 2010 May;36(3):624-32 [PMID: 18849294]
  43. Psychol Med. 2016 Oct;46(13):2717-29 [PMID: 27649341]
  44. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;71(1):33-41 [PMID: 27387772]
  45. Schizophr Res. 2013 Jan;143(1):90-6 [PMID: 23218560]
  46. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb 28;215(2):274-9 [PMID: 24374114]
  47. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;81(1):e1-e3 [PMID: 27876157]
  48. Schizophr Bull. 2019 Apr 25;45(3):610-619 [PMID: 30124959]
  49. Schizophr Bull. 2007 Jul;33(4):1013-22 [PMID: 17099070]
  50. Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:384-390 [PMID: 28751128]
  51. Schizophr Res. 2013 Oct;150(1):151-6 [PMID: 23958487]
  52. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Dec 17;11:3111-25 [PMID: 26719696]
  53. Biometrics. 1999 Jun;55(2):463-9 [PMID: 11318201]
  54. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;33(8):929-36 [PMID: 21644139]
  55. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;65(10):1078-87 [PMID: 22818946]
  56. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187141 [PMID: 29095875]
  57. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;45(2):93-108 [PMID: 21320033]
  58. BMC Med. 2013 May 16;11:132 [PMID: 23680237]
  59. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Dec;30:144-151 [PMID: 28938151]
  60. Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;44(2):395-405 [PMID: 23659373]
  61. Psychiatry Res. 2008 May 30;159(1-2):167-79 [PMID: 18440074]
  62. Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):272-80 [PMID: 22925372]
  63. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2016;116(11):137-144 [PMID: 28635752]
  64. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(3):271-87 [PMID: 20954425]
  65. Nat Genet. 2018 Mar;50(3):381-389 [PMID: 29483656]
  66. Psychiatry Res. 2012 Nov 30;200(1):55-8 [PMID: 22537723]
  67. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010 Mar;33(1):35-66 [PMID: 20159339]
  68. Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):37-50 [PMID: 23461899]
  69. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015 May-Jun;43(3):80-90 [PMID: 25999155]
  70. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Apr;24(4):382-390 [PMID: 29041995]
  71. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):573-88 [PMID: 20620163]
  72. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Oct 30;234(1):74-83 [PMID: 26341950]
  73. Schizophr Res. 2019 Dec;214:51-59 [PMID: 31455518]
  74. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):493-500 [PMID: 28355424]
  75. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Oct 30;229(3):819-27 [PMID: 26272022]
  76. Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb;192:16-29 [PMID: 28416092]
  77. J Neuropsychol. 2019 Sep;13(3):589-602 [PMID: 29683258]
  78. Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;30(8):1002-10 [PMID: 26516984]
  79. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419 [PMID: 23585737]
  80. Schizophr Res. 2010 Sep;122(1-3):219-25 [PMID: 20138738]
  81. Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768 [PMID: 29481436]
  82. Schizophr Res. 2012 Aug;139(1-3):218-24 [PMID: 22658528]
  83. J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2019;4(2): [PMID: 31245629]
  84. Schizophr Res. 2011 Aug;130(1-3):11-9 [PMID: 21489754]
  85. Psychiatry Res. 2016 Apr 30;238:14-23 [PMID: 27086205]
  86. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep;1(5):433-447 [PMID: 27642641]
  87. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2014 Apr;8(1):28-35B [PMID: 23428787]
  88. Neuropsychology. 2017 Oct;31(7):787-797 [PMID: 28368139]
  89. Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(5):334-41 [PMID: 18752104]
  90. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Feb;129(2):116-25 [PMID: 23600715]
  91. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;30(4):446-9 [PMID: 20631562]
  92. Schizophr Bull. 2020 Jan 4;46(1):154-162 [PMID: 30953588]
  93. Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;71:63-70 [PMID: 27636509]
  94. Schizophr Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):186-96 [PMID: 21976710]

Grants

  1. 616163/Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen (University Medical Center Groningen)

MeSH Term

Cognition
Cognition Disorders
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Psychotic Disorders
Schizophrenia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studiessymptomscognitivereviewschizophreniadata-drivendeficitslongitudinalsystematiccross-sectionalclusterstrajectoriesevidencepatientsunaffectedsiblingscontrolsindividualsgeneralpopulationmethodologicalacrossincludedprogressiveidentifiedtacklephenotypicheterogeneitymethodsoftenappliedidentifysubtypesHowevertopiclackingobjectivesummarizeobtainedpositivenegativespectrumdisordershealthyAdditionallyaimedhighlightgapspointfuturedirectionsoptimizetranslatabilityperformedsearchingPsycINFOPubMedPsycTESTSPsycARTICLESSCOPUSEMBASEWebScienceelectronicdatabasespublished20082019reportedleasttwostatisticallyderivedTworeviewersindependentlyscreenedextracteddata531934conductedamong1782287295520foundfourcharacterizedstabilitydeteriorationrelapsingameliorationfunctionCross-sectionalcommonlythreelowintermediatemixedhighpsychoticprofilesMoreoversubgroupspredictednumerousgeneticsociodemographicclinicalfactorsfindingsindicateheterogeneousalthoughlimitationsobservedIdentifiedalongpredictorsmayusedbaseimplementationpersonalizedtreatmentdevelopriskpredictionmodelhigh-riskprodromalnarrativesynthesis

Similar Articles

Cited By (41)