Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive Neuromodulation of the Visual Cortex.

Gengxi Lu, Xuejun Qian, Johnny Castillo, Runze Li, Laiming Jiang, Haotian Lu, K Kirk Shung, Mark S Humayun, Biju B Thomas, Qifa Zhou
Author Information

Abstract

Currently, blindness cannot be cured and patients' living quality can be compromised severely. Ultrasonic (US) neuromodulation is a promising technology for the development of noninvasive cortical visual prosthesis. We investigated the feasibility of transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) for noninvasive stimulation of the visual cortex (VC) to develop improved visual prosthesis. tFUS was used to successfully evoke neural activities in the VC of both normal and retinal degenerate (RD) blind rats. Our results showed that blind rats showed more robust responses to ultrasound stimulation when compared with normal rats. ( , two-sample t-test). Three different types of ultrasound waveforms were used in the three experimental groups. Different types of cortical activities were observed when different US waveforms were used. In all rats, when stimulated with continuous ultrasound waves, only short-duration responses were observed at "US on and off" time points. In comparison, pulsed waves (PWs) evoked longer low-frequency responses. Testing different parameters of PWs showed that a pulse repetition frequency higher than 100 Hz is required to obtain the low-frequency responses. Based on the observed cortical activities, we inferred that acoustic radiation force (ARF) is the predominant physical mechanism of ultrasound neuromodulation.

References

  1. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 Jul;2(4):409-20 [PMID: 16293080]
  2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;90(12):1524-30 [PMID: 16825279]
  3. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017 Sep;124(9):1083-1091 [PMID: 28707160]
  4. Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 04;13:324 [PMID: 31019449]
  5. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007 Jul;3(7):383-93 [PMID: 17611487]
  6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Jun;37(7):1236-49 [PMID: 8641827]
  7. Neurosci Lett. 2005 Sep 9;385(2):143-7 [PMID: 15950381]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3258-63 [PMID: 21300891]
  9. Radiology. 1997 Jul;204(1):247-53 [PMID: 9205255]
  10. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Nov;44(11):2336-2344 [PMID: 30076032]
  11. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov - Dec;11(6):1209-1217 [PMID: 30166265]
  12. Eye (Lond). 2009 Oct;23(10):1999-2005 [PMID: 19098703]
  13. J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 7;39(32):6251-6264 [PMID: 31196935]
  14. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Feb;17(2):322-9 [PMID: 24413698]
  15. Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Feb;44(2):E14 [PMID: 29385924]
  16. J Neural Eng. 2019 Jun;16(3):036006 [PMID: 30818304]
  17. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Feb;42(2):459-70 [PMID: 26525652]
  18. Brain Stimul. 2014 Nov-Dec;7(6):900-8 [PMID: 25265863]
  19. Neuron. 2018 Jun 6;98(5):1031-1041.e5 [PMID: 29804920]
  20. Elife. 2019 Feb 12;8: [PMID: 30747105]
  21. Neuron. 2018 Jun 6;98(5):1020-1030.e4 [PMID: 29804919]
  22. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):301-16 [PMID: 19693003]
  23. Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 23;6:34026 [PMID: 27658372]
  24. Brain Stimul. 2019 Jul - Aug;12(4):901-910 [PMID: 30880027]
  25. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Nov;37(11):1930-7 [PMID: 21925788]
  26. Neuroreport. 2015 Mar 4;26(4):211-5 [PMID: 25646585]
  27. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Nov;67(11):3048-3056 [PMID: 32086192]
  28. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Jan;66(1):217-224 [PMID: 29993389]
  29. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Jun;50:222-231 [PMID: 29674264]
  30. J Ther Ultrasound. 2017 Jun 1;5:14 [PMID: 28572977]
  31. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2007;18(8):1031-55 [PMID: 17705997]
  32. Neuroscience. 1987 Jun;21(3):833-45 [PMID: 3627437]
  33. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;7:361-401 [PMID: 16004575]
  34. Cell. 2017 Jun 1;169(6):1029-1041.e16 [PMID: 28575667]

Grants

  1. P30 EY029220/NEI NIH HHS
  2. R01 EY026091/NEI NIH HHS
  3. R01 EY028662/NEI NIH HHS
  4. R01 EY030126/NEI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Humans
Rats
Ultrasonic Waves
Ultrasonography
Visual Cortex

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ultrasoundratsresponsescorticalvisualusedactivitiesshoweddifferentobservedUSneuromodulationnoninvasiveprosthesistFUSstimulationVCnormalblindtypeswaveformswavesPWslow-frequencyCurrentlyblindnesscuredpatients'livingqualitycancompromisedseverelyUltrasonicpromisingtechnologydevelopmentinvestigatedfeasibilitytranscranialfocusedcortexdevelopimprovedsuccessfullyevokeneuralretinaldegenerateRDresultsrobustcomparedtwo-samplet-testThreethreeexperimentalgroupsDifferentstimulatedcontinuousshort-duration"USoff"timepointscomparisonpulsedevokedlongerTestingparameterspulserepetitionfrequencyhigher100HzrequiredobtainBasedinferredacousticradiationforceARFpredominantphysicalmechanismTranscranialFocusedUltrasoundNoninvasiveNeuromodulationVisualCortex

Similar Articles

Cited By