Reducing Inpatient Hypoglycemia in the General Wards Using Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring: The Glucose Telemetry System, a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lakshmi G Singh, Medha Satyarengga, Isabel Marcano, William H Scott, Lillian F Pinault, Zhaoyong Feng, John D Sorkin, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Elias K Spanakis
Author Information
  1. Lakshmi G Singh: Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  2. Medha Satyarengga: Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Maryland Shore Regional Health, Easton, MD.
  3. Isabel Marcano: Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  4. William H Scott: Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  5. Lillian F Pinault: Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  6. Zhaoyong Feng: Pharmaceutical Research Computing, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD.
  7. John D Sorkin: Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  8. Guillermo E Umpierrez: Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Lipids, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. ORCID
  9. Elias K Spanakis: Division of Endocrinology, Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD ispanakis@som.umaryland.edu. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) systems in the Inpatient setting is considered investigational. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether RT-CGM, using the glucose telemetry system (GTS), can prevent Hypoglycemia in the general wards.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial, insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for Hypoglycemia were recruited. Participants were randomized to RT-CGM/GTS or point-of-care (POC) blood glucose testing. The primary outcome was difference in Inpatient Hypoglycemia.
RESULTS: Seventy-two participants were included in this interim analysis, 36 in the RT-CGM/GTS group and 36 in the POC group. The RT-CGM/GTS group experienced fewer hypoglycemic events (<70 mg/dL) per patient (0.67 [95% CI 0.34-1.30] vs. 1.69 [1.11-2.58], = 0.024), fewer clinically significant hypoglycemic events (<54 mg/dL) per patient (0.08 [0.03-0.26] vs. 0.75 [0.51-1.09], = 0.003), and a lower percentage of time spent below range <70 mg/dL (0.40% [0.18-0.92%] vs. 1.88% [1.26-2.81%], = 0.002) and <54 mg/dL (0.05% [0.01-0.43%] vs. 0.82% [0.47-1.43%], = 0.017) compared with the POC group. No differences in nocturnal Hypoglycemia, time in range 70-180 mg/dL, and time above range >180-250 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL were found between the groups. The RT-CGM/GTS group had no prolonged Hypoglycemia compared with 0.20 episodes <54 mg/dL and 0.40 episodes <70 mg/dL per patient in the POC group.
CONCLUSIONS: RT-CGM/GTS can decrease Hypoglycemia among hospitalized high-risk insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

Associated Data

figshare | 10.2337/figshare.12620303

References

  1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Sep 1;104(9):3679-3691 [PMID: 31042288]
  2. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar;15(3):241-5 [PMID: 23360391]
  3. Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Aug 29;18(10):87 [PMID: 30159754]
  4. Endocr Pract. 2009 May-Jun;15(4):302-12 [PMID: 19502209]
  5. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;13(4):674-681 [PMID: 30636449]
  6. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):611-8 [PMID: 25927357]
  7. Endocr Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):853-61 [PMID: 21550947]
  8. Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):568-74 [PMID: 25665812]
  9. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jul;15(4):370-7 [PMID: 16823014]
  10. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Oct;96(10):2968-79 [PMID: 21976745]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec;36(12):4091-7 [PMID: 24170754]
  12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Feb 1;102(2):416-424 [PMID: 27854553]
  13. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):440-441 [PMID: 27543272]
  14. Diabetes Care. 2011 Aug;34(8):1723-8 [PMID: 21700919]
  15. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603 [PMID: 31177185]
  16. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1153-7 [PMID: 19564471]
  17. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jul 1;102(7):2230-2241 [PMID: 28368484]
  18. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 01;6(5):1022-9 [PMID: 23063027]
  19. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):1028-1035 [PMID: 28290224]
  20. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):1036-1044 [PMID: 28429611]
  21. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Nov;11(11):745-7 [PMID: 19905892]
  22. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 31;10(2):325-9 [PMID: 26330394]
  23. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 May;38(5):195-206 [PMID: 22649859]
  24. Diabetes Care. 2003 May;26(5):1518-24 [PMID: 12716815]
  25. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1631-1640 [PMID: 29162583]
  26. Diabet Med. 2014 Oct;31(10):1218-21 [PMID: 24702036]
  27. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Mar;87(3):978-82 [PMID: 11889147]
  28. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:178-192 [PMID: 28965029]
  29. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):20-25 [PMID: 29237288]
  30. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):125-133 [PMID: 27964837]
  31. Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928 [PMID: 29567642]
  32. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):16-38 [PMID: 22223765]
  33. Am J Med. 2011 Nov;124(11):1028-35 [PMID: 22017781]

Grants

  1. P30 DK111024/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. P30 AG028747/NIA NIH HHS
  3. UL1 TR002378/NCATS NIH HHS
  4. I01 CX001825/CSRD VA
  5. P30 DK072488/NIDDK NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00mg/dLhypoglycemiagroupRT-CGM/GTS[0POCvs=glucose<70perpatient<54timerangeRT-CGMinpatientcanrandomizedinsulin-treatedpatientstype2diabetes36fewerhypoglycemicevents1[143%]comparedepisodesGlucoseOBJECTIVE:Usereal-timecontinuousmonitoringsystemssettingconsideredinvestigationalobjectivestudyevaluatewhetherusingtelemetrysystemGTSpreventgeneralwardsRESEARCHDESIGNANDMETHODS:clinicaltrialhighriskrecruitedParticipantspoint-of-carebloodtestingprimaryoutcomedifferenceRESULTS:Seventy-twoparticipantsincludedinterimanalysisexperienced67[95%CI34-130]6911-258]024clinicallysignificant0803-026]7551-109]003lowerpercentagespent40%18-092%]88%26-281%]00205%01-082%47-1017differencesnocturnal70-180>180-250>250foundgroupsprolonged2040CONCLUSIONS:decreaseamonghospitalizedhigh-riskReducingInpatientHypoglycemiaGeneralWardsUsingReal-timeContinuousMonitoring:TelemetrySystemRandomizedClinicalTrial

Similar Articles

Cited By (66)