Timing of high-dose methotrexate CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL: an analysis of toxicity and impact on R-CHOP delivery.

Matthew R Wilson, Toby A Eyre, Nicolas Martinez-Calle, Matthew Ahearne, Katrina E Parsons, Gavin Preston, Jahanzaib Khwaja, Jeremy Schofield, Johnathon Elliot, Almurtadha Mula Kh, Nimish Shah, Cheuk-Kie Cheung, Matthew A Timmins, Thomas Creasey, Kim Linton, Jeffery Smith, Christopher P Fox, Fiona Miall, Kate Cwynarski, Pamela McKay
Author Information
  1. Matthew R Wilson: Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  2. Toby A Eyre: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  3. Nicolas Martinez-Calle: Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  4. Matthew Ahearne: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
  5. Katrina E Parsons: Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  6. Gavin Preston: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  7. Jahanzaib Khwaja: University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  8. Jeremy Schofield: Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  9. Johnathon Elliot: Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  10. Almurtadha Mula Kh: University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  11. Nimish Shah: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norwich, United Kingdom.
  12. Cheuk-Kie Cheung: Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  13. Matthew A Timmins: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
  14. Thomas Creasey: Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom; and.
  15. Kim Linton: Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  16. Jeffery Smith: Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  17. Christopher P Fox: Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  18. Fiona Miall: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
  19. Kate Cwynarski: University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  20. Pamela McKay: Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Abstract

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is increasingly used as prophylaxis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse. However, there is limited evidence to guide whether to intercalate HD-MTX (i-HD-MTX) between R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone given at 21-day intervals) or to give it at the end of treatment (EOT) with R-CHOP-21. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter analysis of 334 patients with DLBCL who received CNS prophylaxis with i-HD-MTX (n = 204) or EOT HD-MTX (n = 130). Primary end points were R-CHOP delay rates and HD-MTX toxicity. Secondary end points were CNS relapse rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The EOT group had more patients with a high CNS international prognostic index (58% vs 39%; P < .001) and more concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis (56% vs 34%; P < .001). Of the 409 cycles of i-HD-MTX given, 82 (20%) were associated with a delay of next R-CHOP (median, 7 days). Delays were significantly increased when i-HD-MTX was given after day 9 post-R-CHOP (26% vs 16%; P = .01). On multivariable analysis, i-HD-MTX was independently associated with increased R-CHOP delays. Increased mucositis, febrile neutropenia, and longer median inpatient stay were recorded with i-HD-MTX delivery. Three-year cumulative CNS relapse incidence was 5.9%, with no differences between groups. There was no difference in survival between groups. We report increased toxicity and R-CHOP delay with i-HD-MTX compared with EOT delivery but no difference in CNS relapse or survival. Decisions on HD-MTX timing should be individualized and, where i-HD-MTX is favored, we recommend scheduling before day 10 of R-CHOP cycles.

References

  1. Blood. 2019 Feb 28;133(9):919-926 [PMID: 30617197]
  2. Lancet. 2013 May 25;381(9880):1817-26 [PMID: 23615461]
  3. Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;116(18):4283-90 [PMID: 20564149]
  4. Blood Rev. 2012 May;26(3):97-106 [PMID: 22244544]
  5. Br J Haematol. 2020 Jul;190(2):e110-e114 [PMID: 32452526]
  6. Br J Haematol. 2012 May;157(3):401-3 [PMID: 22224728]
  7. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 20;37(21):1790-1799 [PMID: 30939090]
  8. Blood. 1998 Feb 15;91(4):1178-84 [PMID: 9454747]
  9. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Apr;75:195-203 [PMID: 28237865]
  10. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;35(31):3529-3537 [PMID: 28796588]
  11. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):114-9 [PMID: 19047289]
  12. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 Oct;195(1):73-83 [PMID: 810575]
  13. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 10;34(26):3150-6 [PMID: 27382100]
  14. Br J Haematol. 2019 Oct;187(2):185-194 [PMID: 31222719]
  15. Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1575-84 [PMID: 25867256]
  16. Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):621-628 [PMID: 30698644]
  17. Blood. 2009 Apr 23;113(17):3896-902 [PMID: 19144985]
  18. Haematologica. 2020 Jul;105(7):1914-1924 [PMID: 31488560]
  19. Blood. 2019 Jan 24;133(4):299-305 [PMID: 30523119]
  20. Blood. 2018 Nov 22;132(21):2240-2248 [PMID: 30262659]
  21. Br J Haematol. 2017 Nov;179(3):508-510 [PMID: 27443424]
  22. Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 9;111(6):1072-9 [PMID: 25072255]
  23. Blood Adv. 2020 May 12;4(9):1906-1915 [PMID: 32380536]
  24. Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2511-2516 [PMID: 28961838]
  25. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Apr;93:57-68 [PMID: 29477102]
  26. Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21(5):1046-52 [PMID: 19861575]
  27. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1285-1295 [PMID: 30901302]
  28. Br J Haematol. 2015 Mar;168(5):654-62 [PMID: 25312994]

MeSH Term

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Central Nervous System Neoplasms
Cyclophosphamide
Doxorubicin
Humans
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
Methotrexate
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Retrospective Studies
Rituximab
Vincristine

Chemicals

Rituximab
Vincristine
Doxorubicin
Cyclophosphamide
Methotrexate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0i-HD-MTXCNSR-CHOPHD-MTXprophylaxisrelapseEOTsurvivalpatientsgivenendanalysis=delaytoxicityvsPincreaseddeliverymethotrexateDLBCLhighR-CHOP-21npoints<001cyclesassociatedmediandaygroupsdifferenceHigh-doseincreasinglyuseddiffuselargeB-celllymphomariskcentralnervoussystemHoweverlimitedevidenceguidewhetherintercalaterituximabcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinvincristineprednisolone21-dayintervalsgivetreatmentconductedretrospectivemulticenter334received204130PrimaryratesSecondaryrateprogression-freeoverallgroupinternationalprognosticindex58%39%concurrentintrathecal56%34%4098220%next7daysDelayssignificantly9post-R-CHOP26%16%01multivariableindependentlydelaysIncreasedmucositisfebrileneutropenialongerinpatientstayrecordedThree-yearcumulativeincidence59%differencesreportcomparedDecisionstimingindividualizedfavoredrecommendscheduling10Timinghigh-doseDLBCL:impact

Similar Articles

Cited By