Autonomic Phenotypes in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) Are Associated with Illness Severity: A Cluster Analysis.

Joanna Słomko, Fernando Estévez-López, Sławomir Kujawski, Monika Zawadka-Kunikowska, Małgorzata Tafil-Klawe, Jacek J Klawe, Karl J Morten, Justyna Szrajda, Modra Murovska, Julia L Newton, Paweł Zalewski
Author Information
  1. Joanna Słomko: Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland. ORCID
  2. Fernando Estévez-López: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, PO Box 2040 Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Sławomir Kujawski: Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland. ORCID
  4. Monika Zawadka-Kunikowska: Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  5. Małgorzata Tafil-Klawe: Department of Human Physiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Karłowicza 24, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  6. Jacek J Klawe: Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  7. Karl J Morten: Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, The Women Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
  8. Justyna Szrajda: Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  9. Modra Murovska: Institute of Microbiology and Virology, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia. ORCID
  10. Julia L Newton: Population Health Science Institute, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
  11. Paweł Zalewski: Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Ergonomy and Postgraduate Education, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Abstract

In this study we set out to define the characteristics of autonomic subgroups of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The study included 131 patients with CFS (Fukuda criteria). Participants completed the following screening symptom assessment tools: Chalder Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Impact Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scales, the self-reported Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale. Autonomic parameters were measured at rest with a Task Force Monitor (CNS Systems) and arterial stiffness using an Arteriograph (TensioMed Kft.). Principal axis factor analysis yielded four factors: fatigue, subjective and objective autonomic dysfunction and arterial stiffness. Using cluster analyses, these factors were grouped in four autonomic profiles: 34% of patients had sympathetic symptoms with dysautonomia, 5% sympathetic alone, 21% parasympathetic and 40% had issues with sympathovagal balance. Those with a sympathetic-dysautonomia phenotype were associated with more severe disease, reported greater subjective autonomic symptoms with sympathetic over-modulation and had the lowest quality of life. The highest quality of life was observed in the balance subtype where subjects were the youngest, had lower levels of fatigue and the lowest values for arterial stiffness. Future studies will aim to design autonomic profile-specific treatment interventions to determine links between autonomic phenotypes CFS and a specific treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuropsychol Rev. 2005 Mar;15(1):29-58 [PMID: 15929497]
  2. J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Nov;20(11):867-73 [PMID: 16598292]
  3. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jan;65(1):86 [PMID: 25559796]
  4. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 20;12(10):e0186885 [PMID: 29053742]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S79-83 [PMID: 8148458]
  6. Neurology. 1999 Feb;52(3):523-8 [PMID: 10025781]
  7. Comput Biol Med. 2006 Sep;36(9):941-57 [PMID: 16483562]
  8. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Feb;81:14-23 [PMID: 26800634]
  9. Hypertension. 2017 Nov;70(5):848-853 [PMID: 28874465]
  10. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 May;44(5):516-26 [PMID: 24601948]
  11. J Hypertens. 2010 Oct;28(10):2068-75 [PMID: 20651604]
  12. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;43(2):279-87 [PMID: 23838093]
  13. Circulation. 2005 Jun 28;111(25):3384-90 [PMID: 15967850]
  14. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5 [PMID: 1798888]
  15. Biol Psychol. 2006 Aug;73(2):124-31 [PMID: 16473456]
  16. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3 [PMID: 2803071]
  17. Res Nurs Health. 1989 Dec;12(6):347-54 [PMID: 2602575]
  18. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:501754 [PMID: 24511534]
  19. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Jul 20;9(3): [PMID: 31330791]
  20. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 May;54(5):776-83 [PMID: 25288784]
  21. Psychosomatics. 2017 Sep - Oct;58(5):533-543 [PMID: 28596045]
  22. Clin Sci (Lond). 2008 Apr;114(8):561-6 [PMID: 18031285]
  23. Popul Health Metr. 2009 Oct 05;7:17 [PMID: 19804639]
  24. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Mar;80(3):330-4 [PMID: 15757013]
  25. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1997 Sep-Oct;16(5):64-73 [PMID: 9313083]
  26. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Jun;49(6):1146-52 [PMID: 20236955]
  27. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Dec;87(12):1196-201 [PMID: 23218087]
  28. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;35(4):520-7 [PMID: 11531735]
  29. Hypertens Res. 2014 Nov;37(11):999-1007 [PMID: 25056681]
  30. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Nov 1;56(11):2015-2024 [PMID: 28968914]
  31. QJM. 2007 Aug;100(8):519-26 [PMID: 17617647]
  32. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;32(3):541-9 [PMID: 22886012]
  33. J Hypertens. 2010 May;28(5):979-84 [PMID: 20408258]
  34. Physiol Meas. 2012 Feb;33(2):231-41 [PMID: 22273713]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0autonomicFatigueCFSScalepatientsAutonomicarterialstiffnessfatiguesympatheticqualitylifestudyChronicSyndromefoursubjectivesymptomsbalancelowesttreatmentsetdefinecharacteristicssubgroupsincluded131FukudacriteriaParticipantscompletedfollowingscreeningsymptomassessmenttools:ChalderImpactSeverityEpworthSleepinessScalesself-reportedCompositeSymptomparametersmeasuredrestTaskForceMonitorCNSSystemsusingArteriographTensioMedKftPrincipalaxisfactoranalysisyieldedfactors:objectivedysfunctionUsingclusteranalysesfactorsgroupedprofiles:34%dysautonomia5%alone21%parasympathetic40%issuessympathovagalsympathetic-dysautonomiaphenotypeassociatedseverediseasereportedgreaterover-modulationhighestobservedsubtypesubjectsyoungestlowerlevelsvaluesFuturestudieswillaimdesignprofile-specificinterventionsdeterminelinksphenotypesspecificPhenotypesAssociatedIllnessSeverity:ClusterAnalysischronic

Similar Articles

Cited By