Comparing Methods of Recruiting Spanish-Preferring Smokers in the United States: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Patricia Medina-Ramirez, Patricia Calixte-Civil, Lauren R Meltzer, Karen O Brandon, Ursula Martinez, Steven K Sutton, Cathy D Meade, Margaret M Byrne, Thomas H Brandon, Vani N Simmons
Author Information
  1. Patricia Medina-Ramirez: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  2. Patricia Calixte-Civil: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  3. Lauren R Meltzer: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  4. Karen O Brandon: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  5. Ursula Martinez: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  6. Steven K Sutton: Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  7. Cathy D Meade: Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  8. Margaret M Byrne: Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  9. Thomas H Brandon: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID
  10. Vani N Simmons: Tobacco Research & Intervention Program, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a pressing need to address the unacceptable disparities and underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups, including Hispanics or Latinxs, in smoking cessation trials.
OBJECTIVE: Given the lack of research on recruitment strategies for this population, this study aims to assess effective recruitment methods based on enrollment and cost.
METHODS: Recruitment and enrollment data were collected from a nationwide randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a Spanish-language smoking cessation intervention (N=1417). The effectiveness of each recruitment strategy was evaluated by computing the cost per participant (CPP), which is the ratio of direct cost over the number enrolled. More effective strategies yielded lower CPPs. Demographic and smoking-related characteristics of Participants recruited via the two most effective strategies were also compared (n=1307).
RESULTS: Facebook was the most effective method (CPP=US $74.12), followed by TV advertisements (CPP=US $191.31), whereas public bus interior card advertising was the least effective method (CPP=US $642.50). Participants recruited via Facebook had lower average age (P=.008) and had spent fewer years in the United States (P<.001). Among the Participants recruited via Facebook, a greater percentage of individuals had at least a high school education (P<.001) and an annual income above US $10,000 (P<.001). In addition, a greater percentage of individuals were employed (P<.001) and foreign born (P=.003). In terms of subethnicity, among the subjects recruited via Facebook, a lower percentage of individuals were of Mexican origin (P<.001) and a greater percentage of individuals were of Central American (P=.02), South American (P=.01), and Cuban (P<.001) origin.
CONCLUSIONS: Facebook was the most effective method for recruiting Hispanic or Latinx smokers in the United States for this RCT. However, using multiple methods was necessary to recruit a more diverse sample of Spanish-preferring Hispanic or Latinx smokers.

Keywords

References

  1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Feb;78(1):34-43 [PMID: 20099948]
  2. J Health Commun. 2018;23(4):350-359 [PMID: 29533167]
  3. Health Soc Work. 2013 Feb;38(1):29-38 [PMID: 23539894]
  4. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):425-445 [PMID: 30285281]
  5. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0210323 [PMID: 30633744]
  6. Psychol Rep. 1998 Dec;83(3 Pt 2):1455-8 [PMID: 10079737]
  7. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Jul 11;2(2):e32 [PMID: 27400979]
  8. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Nov;32(7):710-714 [PMID: 30284878]
  9. Res Nurs Health. 2009 Feb;32(1):86-95 [PMID: 18767129]
  10. Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):496-506 [PMID: 24745640]
  11. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Feb;24(2):379-85 [PMID: 25406226]
  12. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31 [PMID: 24328648]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 16;13(12): [PMID: 27999280]
  14. Trials. 2015 Feb 12;16:1 [PMID: 25971836]
  15. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;85:105836 [PMID: 31473331]
  16. J Transcult Nurs. 2017 Jul;28(4):342-347 [PMID: 27114390]
  17. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Oct;20(5):410-9 [PMID: 22731733]
  18. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2002 Nov;13(4):477-503 [PMID: 12407964]
  19. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):54-62 [PMID: 26868284]
  20. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360-5 [PMID: 1935872]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009187 [PMID: 23235672]
  22. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Feb;11(2):203-10 [PMID: 19246433]
  23. Ethn Health. 2018 Jan;23(1):111-119 [PMID: 27764955]
  24. Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):896-903 [PMID: 24625159]
  25. Am J Health Promot. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(2):109-18 [PMID: 21039291]
  26. Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:112-22 [PMID: 17850621]
  27. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;67:47-55 [PMID: 29454141]
  28. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):975-82 [PMID: 26180222]
  29. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 09;67(44):1225-1232 [PMID: 30408019]
  30. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158-76 [PMID: 18617085]
  31. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;23(4):523-33 [PMID: 20616295]

Grants

  1. P30 CA076292/NCI NIH HHS
  2. R01 CA199143/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Advertising
Female
Hispanic or Latino
Humans
Language
Male
Middle Aged
Research Design
Smokers
Smoking
United States
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effectiveFacebookP<001recruitmentrecruitedviaP=percentageindividualssmokingcessationstrategiescostlowermethodCPP=USUnitedgreaterHispanicmethodsenrollmentrandomizedcontrolledtrialRCTinterventionparticipantsleastStatesoriginAmericanLatinxsmokersBACKGROUND:pressingneedaddressunacceptabledisparitiesunderrepresentationracialethnicminoritygroupsincludingHispanicsLatinxstrialsOBJECTIVE:GivenlackresearchpopulationstudyaimsassessbasedMETHODS:RecruitmentdatacollectednationwideSpanish-languageN=1417effectivenessstrategyevaluatedcomputingperparticipantCPPratiodirectnumberenrolledyieldedCPPsDemographicsmoking-relatedcharacteristicstwoalsocomparedn=1307RESULTS:$7412followedTVadvertisements$19131whereaspublicbusinteriorcardadvertising$64250Participantsaverageage008spentfeweryearsAmonghighschooleducationannualincomeUS$10000additionemployedforeignborn003termssubethnicityamongsubjectsMexicanCentral02South01CubanCONCLUSIONS:recruitingHoweverusingmultiplenecessaryrecruitdiversesampleSpanish-preferringComparingMethodsRecruitingSpanish-PreferringSmokersStates:FindingsRandomizedControlledTrialLatinosocialmediatobaccocigarettewebbannerad

Similar Articles

Cited By (13)