Diversity, Antibiotic Resistance, and Biofilm-Forming Ability of Enterobacteria Isolated from Red Meat and Poultry Preparations.

Rosa Capita, Ana Castaño-Arriba, Cristina Rodríguez-Melcón, Gilberto Igrejas, Patricia Poeta, Carlos Alonso-Calleja
Author Information
  1. Rosa Capita: Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Veterinary Faculty, University of León, E-24071 León, Spain. ORCID
  2. Ana Castaño-Arriba: Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of León, E-24071 León, Spain.
  3. Cristina Rodríguez-Melcón: Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Veterinary Faculty, University of León, E-24071 León, Spain.
  4. Gilberto Igrejas: Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry, University NOVA of Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal. ORCID
  5. Patricia Poeta: Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry, University NOVA of Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal. ORCID
  6. Carlos Alonso-Calleja: Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Veterinary Faculty, University of León, E-24071 León, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

A total of 44 samples of beef, pork, and poultry preparations were tested. Average counts (log cfu/g) of Enterobacteria were 1.99 ± 0.99 (beef preparations), 1.96 ± 1.44 (pork), 2.09 ± 0.92 (chicken), and 2.17 ± 1.06 (turkey) ( > 0.05). Two hundred enterobacterial strains were identified and 13 genera (21 species) were distinguished, including species that are a significant cause of infection. The most common genera were (32.5% of strains), (17.0%), (12.5%), and (12.0%). Isolates were screened by disc diffusion for susceptibility to 15 antibiotics. A total of 126 strains (63% of the isolates) were multirresistant (having resistance to two or more antibiotics), 46 (23%) were resistant to one antibiotic, and 28 (14%) were sensitive to all antibiotics. The average number of resistances per strain was 2.53 ± 2.05. A higher ( < 0.05) average number of resistances was observed in strains from turkey (3.14 ± 2.55) than in strains from beef (2.15 ± 1.22), pork (2.16 ± 1.39), or chicken (2.44 ± 2.22). At least 50% of strains showed resistance or reduced susceptibility to ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, or streptomycin, considered to be "critically important" antimicrobial agents in human medicine. Seventy-nine strains (39.5%), 60 strains (30.0%), and 46 strains (23.0%) were weak, moderate, and strong biofilm producers (crystal violet assay), respectively. This investigation provides evidence that bacteria from red meat and poultry preparations pose major potential risk to consumers.

Keywords

References

  1. Vet Rec. 2014 Oct 4;175(13):325 [PMID: 24899065]
  2. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Apr 20;115(3):268-80 [PMID: 17320231]
  3. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(1):16-24 [PMID: 12492919]
  4. Microb Drug Resist. 2019 Jan/Feb;25(1):72-79 [PMID: 30142035]
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Feb 14;84(5): [PMID: 29269495]
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Sep;50(9):2951-63 [PMID: 22760050]
  7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Feb;80(4):1268-80 [PMID: 24317080]
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Apr;41(4):867-72 [PMID: 7195193]
  9. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53(1):11-48 [PMID: 23035919]
  10. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Apr 16;223:63-74 [PMID: 26900648]
  11. Poult Sci. 2017 Sep 1;96(11):4046-4052 [PMID: 29050434]
  12. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Feb 15;153(3):281-7 [PMID: 22208955]
  13. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 15;42 Suppl 2:S82-9 [PMID: 16355321]
  14. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Dec 10;8(4): [PMID: 31835475]
  15. Foods. 2019 Nov 01;8(11): [PMID: 31683845]
  16. Food Microbiol. 2013 May;34(1):112-7 [PMID: 23498186]
  17. Access Microbiol. 2020 Feb 10;2(3):acmi000096 [PMID: 32974573]
  18. Food Microbiol. 2016 Feb;53(Pt B):156-64 [PMID: 26678143]
  19. Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Dec 26;8(2):777-785 [PMID: 32148787]
  20. Meat Sci. 2002 Sep;62(1):45-50 [PMID: 22061190]
  21. J Food Prot. 2016 May;79(5):748-56 [PMID: 27296421]
  22. Meat Sci. 2012 Aug;91(4):486-9 [PMID: 22459497]
  23. Poult Sci. 2019 Apr 1;98(4):1791-1804 [PMID: 30544256]
  24. BMC Proc. 2019 Dec 16;13(Suppl 11):20 [PMID: 31890013]
  25. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Oct 30;4:183 [PMID: 29164118]
  26. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Nov 11;2014:565671 [PMID: 27379312]
  27. Food Microbiol. 2012 Sep;31(2):173-80 [PMID: 22608221]
  28. Biofilm. 2019 Sep 12;1:100006 [PMID: 33447793]
  29. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200011 [PMID: 29990340]
  30. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Sep;52(3):489-92 [PMID: 12888584]
  31. Pathogens. 2019 Nov 20;8(4): [PMID: 31756896]
  32. Microorganisms. 2017 Aug 25;5(3): [PMID: 28841156]
  33. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016 Dec 12;7:68 [PMID: 27999667]

Grants

  1. RTI2018-098267-R-C33/Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
  2. LE164G18/Consejería de Educación (Junta de Castilla y León)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0±2strains1preparations00%44beefpork05species5%antibioticsresistancetotalpoultry99chicken17turkeyenterobacterialgenera12susceptibility1546antibioticaveragenumberresistances2239meatsamplestestedAveragecountslogcfu/genterobacteria96099206>Twohundredidentified1321distinguishedincludingsignificantcauseinfectioncommon32Isolatesscreeneddiscdiffusion12663%isolatesmultirresistanttwo23%resistantone2814%sensitiveperstrain53higher<observed3145516least50%showedreducedampicillincefotaximeceftazidimestreptomycinconsidered"criticallyimportant"antimicrobialagentshumanmedicineSeventy-nine603023weakmoderatestrongbiofilmproducerscrystalvioletassayrespectivelyinvestigationprovidesevidencebacteriaredposemajorpotentialriskconsumersDiversityAntibioticResistanceBiofilm-FormingAbilityEnterobacteriaIsolatedRedMeatPoultryPreparationsbiofilm-formingability

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)