Competitive advantage of rare behaviours induces adaptive diversity rather than social conformity in skill learning.

Naama Aljadeff, Luc-Alain Giraldeau, Arnon Lotem
Author Information
  1. Naama Aljadeff: School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  2. Luc-Alain Giraldeau: Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS), Québec, Canada.
  3. Arnon Lotem: School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Abstract

Recent studies have emphasized the role of social learning and cultural transmission in promoting conformity and uniformity in animal groups, but little attention has been given to the role of negative frequency-dependent learning in impeding conformity and promoting diversity instead. Here, we show experimentally that under competitive conditions that are common in nature, social foragers (although capable of social learning) are likely to develop diversity in foraging specialization rather than uniformity. Naive house sparrows that were introduced into groups of foraging specialists did not conform to the behaviour of the specialists, but rather learned to use the alternative food-related cues, thus forming groups of complementary specialists. We further show that individuals in such groups may forage more effectively in diverse environments. Our results suggest that when the benefit from socially acquired skills diminishes through competition in a negative frequency-dependent manner, animal societies will become behaviourally diverse rather than uniform.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.rjdfn2z82
figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5078182

References

Nature. 2015 Feb 26;518(7540):538-41 [PMID: 25470065]
Science. 2018 Sep 7;361(6406):1023-1025 [PMID: 30190405]
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 22;284(1849): [PMID: 28228516]
Science. 2013 Apr 26;340(6131):483-5 [PMID: 23620053]
J Comp Psychol. 1993 Sep;107(3):276-282 [PMID: 8375144]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7790-7797 [PMID: 28739927]
Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):3-15 [PMID: 11170692]
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 22;282(1815): [PMID: 26354936]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12901-4 [PMID: 10536020]
Behav Ecol. 2013 Nov;24(6):1398-1406 [PMID: 24137046]
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 17;25(16):2184-8 [PMID: 26212879]
Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):4-14 [PMID: 15161136]
Front Neurosci. 2012 Jun 14;6:87 [PMID: 22712006]
Science. 2013 Apr 26;340(6131):485-8 [PMID: 23620054]
Anim Cogn. 2002 Dec;5(4):193-208 [PMID: 12461597]
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):207-31 [PMID: 8054445]
Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):487-91 [PMID: 15273386]
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul;22(7):651-665 [PMID: 29759889]
Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;138(1):126-45 [PMID: 22061691]
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 26;287(1933):20201259 [PMID: 32811312]
Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):737-40 [PMID: 16113685]
Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):466-8 [PMID: 20129948]

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Cues
Learning
Social Behavior
Social Conformity
Social Learning
Sparrows

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By