Delivering exceptionally safe transitions of care to older people: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff perspectives.

Ruth Baxter, Rosemary Shannon, Jenni Murray, Jane K O'Hara, Laura Sheard, Alison Cracknell, Rebecca Lawton
Author Information
  1. Ruth Baxter: Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK. Ruth.Baxter@bthft.nhs.uk. ORCID
  2. Rosemary Shannon: Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
  3. Jenni Murray: Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
  4. Jane K O'Hara: School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  5. Laura Sheard: York Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK.
  6. Alison Cracknell: Leeds Centre for Older People's Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  7. Rebecca Lawton: Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transitions of care are often risky, particularly for older people, and shorter hospital stays mean that patients can go home with ongoing care needs. Most previous research has focused on fundamental system flaws, however, care generally goes right far more often than it goes wrong. We explored staff perceptions of how high performing general practice and hospital specialty teams deliver safe transitional care to older people as they transition from hospital to home.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in six general practices and four hospital specialties that demonstrated exceptionally low or reducing readmission rates over time. Data were also collected across four community teams that worked into or with these high-performing teams. In total, 157 multidisciplinary staff participated in semi-structured focus groups or interviews and 9 meetings relating to discharge were observed. A pen portrait approach was used to explore how teams across a variety of different contexts support successful transitions and overcome challenges faced in their daily roles.
RESULTS: Across healthcare contexts, staff perceived three key themes to facilitate safe transitions of care: knowing the patient, knowing each other, and bridging gaps in the system. Transitions appeared to be safest when all three themes were in place. However, staff faced various challenges in doing these three things particularly when crossing boundaries between settings. Due to pressures and constraints, staff generally felt they were only able to attempt to overcome these challenges when delivering care to patients with particularly complex transitional care needs.
CONCLUSIONS: It is hypothesised that exceptionally safe transitions of care may be delivered to patients who have particularly complex health and/or social care needs. In these situations, staff attempt to know the patient, they exploit existing relationships across care settings, and act to bridge gaps in the system. Systematically reinforcing such enablers may improve the delivery of safe transitional care to a wider range of patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio (references 35272 and 36174 ).

Keywords

References

  1. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):444-50 [PMID: 23861483]
  2. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020 Jan;25(1):5-12 [PMID: 31495227]
  3. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302 [PMID: 7633241]
  4. QJM. 2011 Aug;104(8):639-51 [PMID: 21558329]
  5. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;6(11):e011952 [PMID: 27872113]
  6. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):418-20 [PMID: 26294709]
  7. Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):883-893 [PMID: 31301114]
  8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Nov;23(11):880-3 [PMID: 25049424]
  9. CMAJ. 2011 Apr 19;183(7):E391-402 [PMID: 21444623]
  10. BMC Med. 2016 Sep 12;14(1):136 [PMID: 27615745]
  11. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):35-44 [PMID: 25472988]
  12. J Hosp Med. 2013 Feb;8(2):102-9 [PMID: 23184714]
  13. Int J Integr Care. 2017 Nov 13;17(6):3 [PMID: 29588636]
  14. J R Soc Med. 2018 Aug;111(8):276-291 [PMID: 29749286]
  15. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Feb;15(2):454-485 [PMID: 28178023]
  16. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2171-9 [PMID: 19093915]
  17. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun;65(6):1119-1125 [PMID: 28369722]
  18. BMJ. 2015 Feb 20;350:h696 [PMID: 25700551]
  19. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Aug;28(8):618-626 [PMID: 30760607]
  20. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Dec;40(12):550-1 [PMID: 26111380]
  21. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1474-7 [PMID: 15205291]
  22. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):190-201 [PMID: 26590198]
  23. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1597-1608 [PMID: 28403508]
  24. BMJ. 2014 Jan 29;348:g1150 [PMID: 24477016]
  25. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):169 [PMID: 31375082]
  26. J Nurs Manag. 2009 Mar;17(2):218-22 [PMID: 19416425]
  27. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):539-546 [PMID: 29146681]
  28. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 19;18(1):725 [PMID: 30231903]
  29. J Hosp Med. 2007 Sep;2(5):314-23 [PMID: 17935242]
  30. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 10;368(2):100-2 [PMID: 23301730]
  31. Implement Sci. 2009 May 08;4:25 [PMID: 19426507]
  32. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 25;16:297 [PMID: 27457059]
  33. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):510-9 [PMID: 25467399]
  34. BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a1020 [PMID: 18687725]
  35. J Interprof Care. 2012 May;26(3):205-11 [PMID: 22251369]
  36. Qual Health Care. 1999 Dec;8(4):234-8 [PMID: 10847885]
  37. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):338-43 [PMID: 21303770]
  38. BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e022468 [PMID: 30232111]
  39. Emerg Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):44-50 [PMID: 24668396]
  40. J Aging Stud. 2012 Dec;26(4):419-27 [PMID: 22939538]
  41. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):484-93 [PMID: 26954564]
  42. Int J Integr Care. 2014 May 08;14:e013 [PMID: 24868196]
  43. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 18;15:567 [PMID: 26684210]
  44. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1649-56 [PMID: 22829294]
  45. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 30;14:365 [PMID: 25175924]
  46. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e015400 [PMID: 28706095]
  47. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):161-7 [PMID: 12558354]
  48. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1095-107 [PMID: 24820131]
  49. Int J Integr Care. 2014 Mar 27;14:e009 [PMID: 24868193]
  50. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-6 [PMID: 29764929]
  51. Med Care. 2016 Jun;54(6):600-7 [PMID: 27050446]
  52. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:64-72 [PMID: 30710763]
  53. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Mar;43(3):127-137 [PMID: 28334591]

Grants

  1. RP-PG-1214-20017/National Institute For Health Research

MeSH Term

Aged
Delivery of Health Care
Hospitals
Humans
Patient Discharge
Personnel, Hospital
Qualitative Research
Transitional Care
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0carestaffsafeparticularlyhospitalpatientsteamstransitionsTransitionsolderneedssystemtransitionalstudyexceptionallyacrosschallengesthreeoftenpeoplehomegenerallygoesgeneralqualitativefourmultidisciplinarygroupsdischargecontextsovercomefacedthemesknowingpatientgapssettingsattemptcomplexmayBACKGROUND:riskyshorterstaysmeancangoongoingpreviousresearchfocusedfundamentalflawshoweverrightfarwrongexploredperceptionshighperformingpracticespecialtydelivertransitionMETHODS:conductedsixpracticesspecialtiesdemonstratedlowreducingreadmissionratestimeDataalsocollectedcommunityworkedhigh-performingtotal157participatedsemi-structuredfocusinterviews9meetingsrelatingobservedpenportraitapproachusedexplorevarietydifferentsupportsuccessfuldailyrolesRESULTS:Acrosshealthcareperceivedkeyfacilitatecare:bridgingappearedsafestplaceHowevervariousthingscrossingboundariesDuepressuresconstraintsfeltabledeliveringCONCLUSIONS:hypothesiseddeliveredhealthand/orsocialsituationsknowexploitexistingrelationshipsactbridgeSystematicallyreinforcingenablersimprovedeliverywiderrangeTRIALREGISTRATION:registeredUKClinicalResearchNetworkStudyPortfolioreferences3527236174Deliveringpeople:perspectivesElderlyFocusHealthprofessionalsHospitalPatientsafetyPositivedevianceQualitative

Similar Articles

Cited By