Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets.

Badar Nadeem Ashraf
Author Information
  1. Badar Nadeem Ashraf: School of Finance, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang (330013), China.

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic came as a rare, unprecedented event and governments around the globe scrambled with emergency actions including social distancing measures, public awareness programs, testing and quarantining policies, and income support packages. In this paper, we examine the expected economic impact of government actions by analyzing the effect of such actions on stock market returns. Using daily data from January 22 to April 17, 2020 from 77 countries, we find announcements of government social distancing measures have a direct negative effect on stock market returns due to their adverse effect on economic activity, while an indirect positive effect through the reduction in COVID-19 confirmed cases. Government announcements regarding public awareness programs, testing and quarantining policies, and income support packages largely result in positive market returns. Our findings have important policy implications, primarily by showing that government social distancing measures have both positive and negative economic impact.

Keywords

References

  1. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jul;41:101857 [PMID: 36568731]
  2. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101597 [PMID: 32550842]
  3. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101591 [PMID: 32837362]
  4. J Transp Geogr. 2020 Dec;89:102894 [PMID: 33519126]
  5. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100326 [PMID: 32292707]
  6. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538 [PMID: 33686204]
  7. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101625 [PMID: 36569647]
  8. Res Int Bus Finance. 2020 Dec;54:101248 [PMID: 34170988]
  9. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101607 [PMID: 32550843]
  10. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101554 [PMID: 38620241]
  11. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2020 Jul;70:101496 [PMID: 38620230]
  12. J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 Dec;180:544-554 [PMID: 33100443]
  13. Res Int Bus Finance. 2020 Dec;54:101249 [PMID: 34170989]
  14. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101528 [PMID: 32837360]
  15. Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Sep;38:89-94 [PMID: 26253461]
  16. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100343 [PMID: 32427152]
  17. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101512 [PMID: 32562472]
  18. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100341 [PMID: 32427215]
  19. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100349 [PMID: 32550128]
  20. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101745 [PMID: 32895606]
  21. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):440 [PMID: 32242087]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19distancinggovernmenteffectmarketactionssocialmeasureseconomicimpactreturnspositivepublicawarenessprogramstestingquarantiningpoliciesincomesupportpackagesstockannouncementsnegativeGovernmentinterventionsoutbreakpandemiccamerareunprecedentedeventgovernmentsaroundglobescrambledemergencyincludingpaperexamineexpectedanalyzingUsingdailydataJanuary22April17202077countriesfinddirectdueadverseactivityindirectreductionconfirmedcasesregardinglargelyresultfindingsimportantpolicyimplicationsprimarilyshowingEconomicpandemic:InternationalevidencefinancialmarketsCoronavirusPandemicSARS-CoV-2SocialStock

Similar Articles

Cited By (132)