Optimization of Viability Treatment Essential for Accurate Droplet Digital PCR Enumeration of Probiotics.

Anthony Kiefer, Peipei Tang, Samuel Arndt, Vincenzo Fallico, Connie Wong
Author Information
  1. Anthony Kiefer: DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Madison, WI, United States.
  2. Peipei Tang: DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Madison, WI, United States.
  3. Samuel Arndt: DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Madison, WI, United States.
  4. Vincenzo Fallico: DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Madison, WI, United States.
  5. Connie Wong: DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Madison, WI, United States.

Abstract

Improvements offered by viability droplet digital PCR (v-ddPCR) include increased precision, specificity and decreased time to results making for an attractive alternative method to traditional plate count enumeration of probiotic products. A major hurdle faced in v-ddPCR, however, is distinguishing between live and dead cells. The objective of this study was to evaluate a combination of PMA and EMA (PE51) for viability treatment of freeze-dried probiotic powders. La-14 and subsp. Bi-07 were analyzed over a 2-log PE51 concentration gradient to investigate the efficiency across genus and assay targets. Results suggest a need to optimize viability dye concentration based on the genera of the organism, but also the assay target, even when analyzing the same organism. When optimized for PE51 concentration, strain specific v-ddPCR assays for both La-14 and Bi-07 were demonstrated to agree with plate count enumeration results. In conclusion, while these v-ddPCR assays require highly specific optimization, they are better suited for the future of the probiotic industry and are suggested to be implemented in probiotic product testing.

Keywords

References

  1. J Biol Chem. 1984 Sep 10;259(17):11090-7 [PMID: 6088528]
  2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;72(3):1997-2004 [PMID: 16517648]
  3. Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 22;10:3025 [PMID: 32038522]
  4. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Oct;84(6):1137-47 [PMID: 19529931]
  5. J Mol Biol. 2000 Sep 8;302(1):205-17 [PMID: 10964570]
  6. Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 11;9:704 [PMID: 29696008]
  7. Mol Cell Probes. 2015 Jun;29(3):190-2 [PMID: 25797787]
  8. Clin Chem. 2013 Jun;59(6):892-902 [PMID: 23570709]
  9. J Microbiol Methods. 2014 Aug;103:9-17 [PMID: 24814752]
  10. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;63(2):119-23 [PMID: 20332575]
  11. Food Microbiol. 2007 May;24(3):230-53 [PMID: 17188202]
  12. Microorganisms. 2019 Mar 17;7(3): [PMID: 30884906]
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Nov 15;84(23): [PMID: 30266728]
  14. J Microbiol Methods. 2011 May;85(2):164-9 [PMID: 21324348]
  15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jul;76(13):4318-26 [PMID: 20472736]
  16. J Dairy Res. 2010 Nov;77(4):498-504 [PMID: 20822571]
  17. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991;45:301-25 [PMID: 1683763]
  18. J Microbiol Methods. 2011 May;85(2):124-30 [PMID: 21329735]
  19. Benef Microbes. 2016 Sep;7(4):559-69 [PMID: 27241905]
  20. J Microbiol Methods. 2018 May;148:64-73 [PMID: 29548643]
  21. J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Nov;67(2):310-20 [PMID: 16753236]
  22. J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Apr;93(1):20-4 [PMID: 23389080]
  23. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 May;48(5):633-8 [PMID: 19416465]
  24. J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Nov;91(2):276-89 [PMID: 22940102]
  25. J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Oct;105(4):1178-85 [PMID: 18624747]
  26. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2001 Jun;12(3):215-23 [PMID: 11428914]
  27. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7501-8 [PMID: 19801460]
  28. Biotechniques. 2003 Apr;34(4):804-8, 810, 812-3 [PMID: 12703305]
  29. Anal Biochem. 2011 Nov 1;418(1):37-43 [PMID: 21771573]
  30. Benef Microbes. 2015;6(4):573-81 [PMID: 25653154]
  31. Cytometry A. 2007 Aug;71(8):592-8 [PMID: 17421025]
  32. Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 17;10:739 [PMID: 31105649]
  33. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Aug;11(8):506-14 [PMID: 24912386]
  34. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Apr;79(7):2182-8 [PMID: 23354719]
  35. Anal Chem. 2011 Nov 15;83(22):8604-10 [PMID: 22035192]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0viabilityv-ddPCRprobioticPE51enumerationconcentrationPCRresultsplatecountPMAEMALa-14Bi-07assayorganismspecificassaysImprovementsoffereddropletdigitalincludeincreasedprecisionspecificitydecreasedtimemakingattractivealternativemethodtraditionalproductsmajorhurdlefacedhoweverdistinguishinglivedeadcellsobjectivestudyevaluatecombinationtreatmentfreeze-driedpowderssubspanalyzed2-loggradientinvestigateefficiencyacrossgenustargetsResultssuggestneedoptimizedyebasedgeneraalsotargetevenanalyzingoptimizedstraindemonstratedagreeconclusionrequirehighlyoptimizationbettersuitedfutureindustrysuggestedimplementedproducttestingOptimizationViabilityTreatmentEssentialAccurateDropletDigitalEnumerationProbioticsBifidobacteriumLactobacillusddPCR

Similar Articles

Cited By