Transcriptome Analysis of the Response to Different Doses of .

Jingpeng Yang, Hong Yang
Author Information
  1. Jingpeng Yang: State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  2. Hong Yang: State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Probiotics are widely used in the prevention of infection (CDI). The precise dosage of probiotics is a challenge. In this study, ATCC 9689 (CD) was exposed to different doses of (YH68). A transcriptomic analysis was performed on CD cells that were separately exposed to low or high doses of YH68 cell-free culture supernatant (CFCS; CDL; or CDH, respectively). The results showed that the inhibitory effect of YH68 (cell pellets or CFCS) on the growth and the damage to the cell membrane integrity of CD exhibited a dose-response relationship at the physiological level. At the transcriptional level, a large number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were concentrated in amino acid, carbohydrate, energy metabolism and membrane transport in CDL and CDH cells, suggesting that both doses of YH68-CFCS triggered a significant change in activities in these metabolic pathways. Importantly, a significant stimulation or suppression was found in the pathogenic pathways (quorum sensing, signal transduction, flagellar assembly, biofilm formation, and drug resistance) of CDL and CDH cells, whereas there were some differences between the two doses. For example, the expression levels of genes related to quorum sensing and signal transduction in CDH cells were suppressed significantly, whereas genes encoding toxin production and sporulation factors were enhanced; in CDL cells, the expression levels of genes associated with flagellar assembly and biofilm formation were suppressed, whereas genes associated with drug resistance were upregulated significantly. These results indicated that the inhibitory effect of YH68-CFCS against CD, especially in pathogenic and metabolic aspects, did not demonstrate a dose-response relationship at the transcriptional level.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Microbiol. 2018 Nov;3(11):1255-1265 [PMID: 30349083]
  2. JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):499-500 [PMID: 30027207]
  3. Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 15;25(8):1091-3 [PMID: 19237447]
  4. Anaerobe. 2017 Jun;45:106-113 [PMID: 28216085]
  5. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;49(11):1376-1384 [PMID: 31025399]
  6. Bioinformatics. 2013 Mar 1;29(5):661-3 [PMID: 23325622]
  7. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jan;70(1):153-9 [PMID: 25151204]
  8. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;16(4):202-204 [PMID: 30692658]
  9. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Nov;14(11):1057-64 [PMID: 19040478]
  10. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Nov;56(7):493-509 [PMID: 31411909]
  11. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;16(10):605-616 [PMID: 31296969]
  12. Microb Pathog. 2017 Jun;107:249-253 [PMID: 28286152]
  13. J Infect. 2017 Jun;74 Suppl 1:S120-S127 [PMID: 28646951]
  14. Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):716-729 [PMID: 31061539]
  15. Trends Microbiol. 2016 Jun;24(6):463-476 [PMID: 26897710]
  16. Trends Microbiol. 2015 Jun;23(6):354-66 [PMID: 25840765]
  17. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Apr 07;2:16020 [PMID: 27158839]
  18. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jan 15;14:29 [PMID: 24422950]
  19. Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(suppl_1):S49-S66 [PMID: 30721959]
  20. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1889-1900.e9 [PMID: 28192108]
  21. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2535-2536 [PMID: 29860912]
  22. Gut Microbes. 2017 Nov 2;8(6):521-543 [PMID: 28640662]
  23. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Aug 07;9:288 [PMID: 31440478]
  24. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;34(1):3-10 [PMID: 29189354]
  25. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(5):1146-51 [PMID: 15836484]
  26. Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 21;9:1970 [PMID: 30186274]
  27. mSphere. 2018 Mar 28;3(2): [PMID: 29600278]
  28. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;105(7):1636-41 [PMID: 20145608]
  29. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):ITC49-ITC64 [PMID: 30285209]
  30. Infect Immun. 2012 Oct;80(10):3521-32 [PMID: 22851750]
  31. Anaerobe. 2017 Jun;45:3-9 [PMID: 28254263]
  32. Front Microbiol. 2018 Dec 04;9:2953 [PMID: 30564210]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cellsgenesCDdosesCDLCDHYH68levelwhereasdosageexposedtranscriptomicanalysisCFCSresultsinhibitoryeffectcellmembranedose-responserelationshiptranscriptionalYH68-CFCSsignificantmetabolicpathwayspathogenicquorumsensingsignaltransductionflagellarassemblybiofilmformationdrugresistanceexpressionlevelssuppressedsignificantlytoxinproductionassociatedProbioticswidelyusedpreventioninfectionCDIpreciseprobioticschallengestudyATCC9689differentperformedseparatelylowhighcell-freeculturesupernatantrespectivelyshowedpelletsgrowthdamageintegrityexhibitedphysiologicallargenumberdifferentiallyexpressedDEGsconcentratedaminoacidcarbohydrateenergymetabolismtransportsuggestingtriggeredchangeactivitiesImportantlystimulationsuppressionfounddifferencestwoexamplerelatedencodingsporulationfactorsenhancedupregulatedindicatedespeciallyaspectsdemonstrateTranscriptomeAnalysisResponseDifferentDosesBifidobacteriumbreveClostridioidesdifficile

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)