Understanding Allogrooming Through a Dynamic Social Network Approach: An Example in a Group of Dairy Cows.

Inés de Freslon, J M Peralta, Ana C Strappini, Gustavo Monti
Author Information
  1. Inés de Freslon: Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Preventive Veterinary Medicine Institute, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
  2. J M Peralta: College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States.
  3. Ana C Strappini: Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Animal Science Institute, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
  4. Gustavo Monti: Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Preventive Veterinary Medicine Institute, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.

Abstract

For gregarious species such as domestic cattle, the social environment is a very important determinant of their welfare and fitness. Understanding the complexity of cows' relationships can assist the development of management practices that are more integrated with the cows' social behavioral processes. The two aims of this study were: (1) to determine the dynamics of affiliative relationships, as indicated by allogrooming, by means of stochastic actor-oriented modeling, in dairy cows during early lactation; (2) to explore the underlying processes and the individual attributes, such as age, social rank and reproductive state, that could shape network pattern changes in grooming contacts between individual. We observed the allogrooming behavior of a dynamic group of 38 dairy cows for 4 h per day for 30 days. Using stochastic actor-oriented models, we modeled the dynamics of weekly contacts and studied how structural processes (e.g., reciprocity, transitivity, or popularity) and individual attributes (i.e., age, social rank, and reproductive state) influence network changes. We found that cows tended to groom individuals that had previously groomed them, implying a possible cooperation. Cows that groomed more actively did not appear to have a preference for specific individuals in the herd, and in return, tended to be groomed by fewer cows over time. Older individuals groomed more cows than younger ones, indicating that allogrooming could be related to seniority. Cows groomed mainly individuals of similar age, suggesting that familiarity and growing up together enhanced social grooming. Over time, cows with higher social rank were groomed by fewer cows and individuals recently reintroduced to the group groomed more herdmates. The study of social network dynamics can be used to better understand the complexity and non-linearity of cow relationships. Our findings, along with further research, can complement and strengthen the design of improved management practices that are more in line with the natural social behavior of cows.

Keywords

References

  1. J Dairy Sci. 2001 Nov;84(11):2424-9 [PMID: 11768083]
  2. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129253 [PMID: 26107251]
  3. Physiol Behav. 2007 Oct 22;92(3):375-97 [PMID: 17428510]
  4. Horm Behav. 2007 Jun;52(1):106-13 [PMID: 17490663]
  5. J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):128-138 [PMID: 28994101]
  6. J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2312-9 [PMID: 21524520]
  7. J Anim Ecol. 2017 Mar;86(2):202-212 [PMID: 28004848]
  8. Am J Primatol. 2017 Jun;79(6): [PMID: 28464245]
  9. Sci Rep. 2019 May 10;9(1):7208 [PMID: 31076637]
  10. Anim Reprod Sci. 2011 Apr;124(3-4):163-9 [PMID: 20875708]
  11. J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):1011-6 [PMID: 18292257]
  12. Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jun 12;6:183 [PMID: 31245398]
  13. Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 20;7:539 [PMID: 27148146]
  14. J Theor Biol. 1977 Apr 21;65(4):671-98 [PMID: 406485]
  15. Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 21;7:915 [PMID: 27445890]
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150084 [PMID: 26729924]
  17. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 10;10(2):e0117298 [PMID: 25668722]
  18. Adv Data Anal Classif. 2011 Jul;5(2):147-176 [PMID: 22003370]
  19. Ecol Lett. 2015 Jul;18(7):687-95 [PMID: 25975663]
  20. Primates. 1999 Jan;40(1):47-59 [PMID: 23179531]
  21. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 [PMID: 27330520]
  22. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2004 Nov;20(3):495-520 [PMID: 15471622]
  23. Animals (Basel). 2015 Nov 24;5(4):1169-79 [PMID: 26610578]
  24. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69(5):841-855 [PMID: 25926713]
  25. Animals (Basel). 2014 Mar 17;4(1):93-118 [PMID: 26479886]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 5;285(1886): [PMID: 30185649]
  27. Curr Zool. 2017 Aug;63(4):379-388 [PMID: 29491998]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialcowsgroomedindividualsnetworkrelationshipscanprocessesdynamicsallogroomingstochasticactor-orienteddairyindividualagerankgroomingbehaviorCowsUnderstandingcomplexitycows'managementpracticesstudyattributesreproductivestatechangescontactsdynamicgroupmodelsetendedfewertimegregariousspeciesdomesticcattleenvironmentimportantdeterminantwelfarefitnessassistdevelopmentintegratedbehavioraltwoaimswere:1determineaffiliativeindicatedmeansmodelingearlylactation2exploreunderlyingshapepatternobserved384hperday30daysUsingmodeledweeklystudiedstructuralgreciprocitytransitivitypopularityiinfluencefoundgroompreviouslyimplyingpossiblecooperationactivelyappearpreferencespecificherdreturnOlderyoungeronesindicatingrelatedsenioritymainlysimilarsuggestingfamiliaritygrowingtogetherenhancedhigherrecentlyreintroducedherdmatesusedbetterunderstandnon-linearitycowfindingsalongresearchcomplementstrengthendesignimprovedlinenaturalAllogroomingDynamicSocialNetworkApproach:ExampleGroupDairyanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By